Archive for the 'Disease Cluster Community News' Category

Officials investigate cancer cluster among faculty at Clinton Township school

Terry on Aug 27th 2010

Friday, August 27, 2010, 9:51 PM
Stephen Stirling/For The Star-Ledger
CLINTON TOWNSHIP — State and Hunterdon County officials are investigating a potential cancer cluster at a Clinton Township school after concerns were raised in the district about the number and types of cancer cases occurring among faculty members, according to the superintendent.
Clinton Township Schools Superintendent Kevin Carroll sent a letter to parents Thursday informing them that the Hunterdon County Department of Health, the state Department of Health’s Cancer Epidemiology Services office and a private firm have been contacted in regard to a number of cancer cases that have occurred in the faculty at the Patrick McGaheran School over the last 20 years.
“When you know people have cancer and you hear of people you know having it, that’s jarring enough. But when some of these [Clinton Township Education] Association members started bringing up a potential correlation I knew we had to act,” Carroll said today. “When a situation is out of your scope of expertise, you contact those experts and that’s exactly what we did.”
Carroll said the concerns were specific to the faculty and no students were involved. He has been assured by the state that there is no danger that would require the district to close the school and urged parents not to jump to conclusions until the investigation is complete.
“During our initial conference call it was acknowledged that cancer — as other diseases — does not occur evenly over time and place,” Carroll said in the letter. “In the vast majority of instances, perceived clusters of disease are due to random variation. It was also noted that there are many forms of cancer, each with their own causes and risk factors, only some of which are known to have an environmental tie-in.”
Numbers of faculty affected and the types of cancer involved were not immediately known. State officials are currently awaiting information collected from a recent faculty survey commissioned by the Clinton Township Education Association, and will proceed with analysis once they do.
Health Department spokeswoman Marilyn Riley said the state handles between 50 and 70 inquiries regarding potential cancer clusters each year.
“The first step — which is where we are in the Clinton school inquiry — is to collect more detailed information about the specific type of cancer each person was diagnosed with, when they were diagnosed, their age at diagnosis and other demographic information,” Riley said. “This information helps us determine whether there are any unusual patterns that need further analysis.”
Additionally, Carroll said the district has contracted RK Occupational and Environmental Analysis to perform analysis as well.
CTEA President Kathleen Collins could not be reached for further comment.
Clinton Township Mayor Kevin Cimei said he believes the school district is handling the situation properly, but was taken off-guard by the investigation.
“It was kind of been a surprise,” he said. “Anecdotally, having my kids go through the school system, from time to time you’d see someone here or there come down with cancer, but there’s never been anyone really that’s come out and tried to connect the dots.”
Neither the Hunterdon County Superintendent nor the state Department of Education had been made aware of the situation prior to Carroll’s letter.
The Hunterdon County Health Department did not return calls seeking comment.
<a href=”http://www.nj.com/news/local/index.ssf/2010/08/cancer_cluster_questions_raise.html”read online</a>

Filed in New Jersey,~Media Feeds | No responses yet

Rohm and Haas to pay for testing

Terry on Aug 26th 2010

By KEVIN P. CRAVER – kcraver@nwherald.com

McCULLOM LAKE – Rohm and Haas is willing to pay for testing McCullom Lake’s air and groundwater for vinyl chloride contamination.

The manager of the company’s Ringwood plant made the offer in response to a request from County Board Chairman Ken Koehler, R-Crystal Lake. The Aug. 19 letter from Plant Manager Tom Bielas offers to cover the $50,000 projected cost of testing all of the village’s private wells for vinyl chloride, as well as pay $5,000 toward testing the village’s air.

Koehler revealed the letter at Wednesday’s meeting of the County Board Public Health and Human Services Committee. He said the tentative deal would go a long way toward giving village residents peace of mind that their air and water is safe today from contamination blamed in 31 lawsuits for causing a brain cancer cluster.

“It’s a good gesture on their part, and obviously, they would like to know, as we would like to know, if there was anything that was done to the water,” Koehler said. “It’s a nice, neighborly act.”

But plaintiffs’ attorney Aaron Freiwald said he believed that the gesture was a public relations move that had little to do with public safety and a lot to do with the fact that the first lawsuit goes to trial in a Philadelphia court in about three weeks.

“I’m very skeptical of the motives of the company and the county, as this proposal comes literally on the eve of trial and more than four years after we started with all of this,” Freiwald said. “They have always had each other’s interests in mind and have not shown any sincere concerns for the people of McCullom Lake.”

The families of three former village next-door neighbors diagnosed with brain cancer filed the first lawsuits in April 2006. They allege that air and groundwater pollution from the Rohm and Haas and neighboring Modine Manufacturing plants caused a cluster of brain and pituitary cancers in the village and the Lakeland Park subdivision in neighboring McHenry. Modine settled out of court in 2008.

Rohm and Haas also is offering another $50,000 to commission an “independent expert assessment of the various theories of vinyl chloride exposure in the village.” Vinyl chloride is a colorless gas with numerous industrial uses. It is recognized as a carcinogen by international health agencies, with some studies linking it to brain cancer.

The company’s proposal requests that either county government or the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency select certified firms to do the testing “to assure that such results are both independent and credible.” But county government’s independence and credibility in the matter is severely strained.

Within a month of the first lawsuits, the McHenry County Department of Health concluded before village residents and county government that brain cancer rates in the area were not above average and that the companies’ pollution never reached village wells.

Northwest Herald investigations since 2007 have concluded that the health department’s work was rushed, scientifically unsound and biased in favor of Rohm and Haas. The health department and county government still stand by the work, but Koehler said Wednesday that the health department would have no involvement in securing the proposed testing.

McCullom Lake Village President Terry Counley applauded Koehler’s effort to ask the company for funding. But Counley said that he would prefer for the IEPA, with the village’s input, to find the testing companies because residents do not trust the county or the health department in the matter.

Counley last month began fighting for the county to pay for well testing, but officials told him that the village needed to help pay for it. He said that he was “100 percent convinced” that Rohm and Haas’ offer was a public relations move, but he also said that he welcomed the funding.

“I’m not going to turn it down – I’d be out of my mind,” Counley said. “I’ve turned over every rock to find the money to pay for the well testing. If I had the money, I’d pay for it myself.”

Rohm and Haas spokeswoman Maureen Garrity said the company’s offer was not a public relations maneuver but a response to the county’s request for assistance and a measure of the company’s commitment to public safety. She said the company sympathized with area brain cancer victims, but that testing would back up its innocence.

“Our position all along is there has been no scientific link between the cancers and what happens at the Ringwood facility,” Garrity said.

By the numbers

$50,000 – The total amount that Rohm and Haas has pledged to test McCullom Lake’s private wells for vinyl chloride at an estimated $125 per well for all 400 homes.

$5,000 – The amount Rohm and Haas pledged to test the air in McCullom Lake for vinyl chloride.

$50,000 – The total amount the company volunteered for an independent analysis of “the various theories of vinyl chloride exposure in the village.”

31 – The number of plaintiffs since 2006 who allege that pollution from the Ringwood specialty chemicals plant caused a cluster of brain and pituitary tumors in McCullom Lake and the Lakeland Park subdivision in McHenry.

On the Net

To read and watch the Northwest Herald’s ongoing investigation of the McCullom Lake brain cancer cluster, visit NWHerald.com/mccullomlake.

Copyright © 2010 Northwest Herald. All rights reserved.

read online

Filed in Illinois | No responses yet

Possible Cancer Cluster in Carlsbad Under Investigation

Terry on Aug 25th 2010

Residents Say Cluster Exists; Officials Disagree

By KIM CAROLLO, ABC News Medical Unit
Aug. 25, 2010

Stacey and John Quartarone of Carlsbad, Calif., lost son Chase, 16, to non-Hodgkins lymphoma in December.

A dying wish was for his parents to find out what caused his cancer.

“He said, ‘Please don’t let anybody else get this,’” mom Stacey Quartarone said.

The Quartarones are doing their best to honor their son’s wish. They’ve done their research and have discovered others in Carlsbad who said they have cancer or whose family members developed it.

But what started as a quest to determine Chase’s cause of death led them to what they believe is a so-called cancer cluster around Kelly Elementary School, which their son had attended.

“There were at least 15 confirmed cases of cancer in the last 15 years,” Stacey Quartarone said. “We’re positive that at least eight teachers have had different types of cancer in the last 10 years.”

The Quartarones and others who believe something environmental is behind what they describe as an abnormally high number of cancer cases in Carlsbad pushed the school district earlier this year to perform soil testing.

“They went ahead and did two tests, and they came back negative,” she said. “But they didn’t test the soil, just playground sand.”

Quartarone said two private companies hired by the school district tested the sand in a playground at Kelly Elementary School and another site. No one, she said, has revealed where the other site is or exactly what was tested.

The school district has yet to approve additional soil testing, she said.

“It’s an issue of funding, and they feel the previous tests proved that everything is fine,” she said.

But, she added, the district said it would take up the issue again if community members agreed to pay for the soil testing.

Carlsbad School District board of education president Mark Tanner said the city’s schools are safe.

“The Board believes we have carefully and thoroughly evaluated the facts surrounding the safety of our schools,” he said. “Multiple independent data indicate they are very safe environments wherein Carlsbad Unified students are educated and employees work.”

Tests of the air surrounding Kelly Elementary School are underway, and results should be available in September or October, according to the San Diego County Department of Health.

Existence of Clusters Difficult to Prove

Quartarone said a number of children developed rare cancers, which is more proof that there could be cancer-causing agents in the environment.

According to information on the San Diego County Department of Health’s website, however, the number of cases of leiomyosarcoma, one of those rare cancers, was not abnormal for the area surrounding Kelly Elementary School. Specific data for the particular area aren’t available. John Quartarone said that there were also cases of thyroid cancer and bone cancer.

Epidemiologists say that statistics make it difficult to prove that cancer clusters actually exist.

“What health departments do is look at statistics and determine whether there is a higher incidence in a region,” said Regina Santella, professor of environmental health sciences at the Mailman School of Public Health of Columbia University in New York.

“If it seems higher, that still doesn’t mean there is some particular cause. It could be a statistical fluke.”

Thomas Burke, professor and associate dean of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore, said, “Some people are much more susceptible to cancer, and there’s an interaction between the environment and genetics that can contribute to cancer.

“Sometimes, we see very elevated numbers but it will be a small population. So it’s sometimes due to chance.”

And even if there is no cluster, he added, it’s sometimes important to run tests to determine if there is something in the environment that could be affecting the community’s health.

John Quartarone said that about 440 people who either live in Carlsbad or lived there once before contacted him on his web site and told him they had developed cancer over the past 10 years.

Data from the California Cancer Registry show that between 1998 and 2008, the last year for which data are available, San Diego County had an age-adjusted cancer incidence rate of 511 cases per 100,000 people. Before adjusting for age, the rate was about 468 cases per 100,000 people. State rates are 478 and 434, respectively. Carlsbad has a population of roughly 100,000 people.

City officials said that study results from 2007 and 2008 showed no elevated rate of cancer in Carlsbad. They said that a more recent study done in response to concerns by city residents also showed no evidence of a cancer cluster in the city.

Despite the data, Quartarone has no plans to give up his fight to find out what’s causing cancer in Carlsbad.

In addition to Kelly Elementary School, the Quartarones want tests on the the ball fields where some of the children who developed cancer played together.

“I’m going to continue to pursue what I think is necessary for the schools to be safe,” he said. “My son asked me to do something and I have to complete it.”

Copyright © 2010 ABC News Internet Ventures

online article with video.

Filed in California | No responses yet

Md., federal agencies probe for Agent Orange information

Terry on Aug 24th 2010

Frederick News-Post

Frederick, MD–State and federal agencies requested the Army test for Agent Orange near Fort Detrick, a Maryland Department of Environment spokeswoman said Thursday.The Maryland Department of Environment and the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene released a statement Thursday outlining efforts to address environmental contamination at and around Fort Detrick, as well as allegations the contaminants resulted in a cancer cluster.

The statement said the two agencies requested Fort Detrick test for Agent Orange, in addition to the Army post’s continued obligation to test for chemicals, including PCE and TCE, that in 1992 were found to have leaked from Area B.

“MDE and EPA made that request to the Army in conversations in late July — and the Army agreed to do the sampling,” wrote MDE spokeswoman Dawn Stoltzfus in an e-mail Thursday.

“Right now, the Army is doing record review on their historical use of Agent Orange. Then the Army will submit a sampling plan based on their records and propose areas to be tested and what they will be tested for. We know that this will include Area B and adjacent properties.”

MDE and EPA would need to approve the sampling plan, she said.

MDE and DHMH also are “in ongoing communication” with the Kristen Renee Foundation, which claims Fort Detrick is responsible for a cancer cluster in the neighborhoods surrounding the Army post, according to the statement released by MDE secretary Shari Wilson and DHMH secretary Frances Phillips.

“We understand the serious questions and concerns that remain, particularly when a loved one’s health is at stake,” the statement said, adding the groups had scheduled public meetings for the first Thursday of every month, to be held at 6:30 p.m. at Winchester Hall. The first of those meetings was held Aug. 12 and ran longer than the two-hour schedule.

DHMH is working with the Frederick County Health Department to review data from the Maryland Cancer Registry to determine the numbers and types of cancers in three census tracts around Fort Detrick, which is more or less a one-mile radius around the post.

Officials must determine whether the data in the registry and provided by the Kristen Renee Foundation constitutes a cancer rate that is statistically significantly higher than the cancer rates for the county or state. This process could take until the end of September, Clifford Mitchell, chief of DHMH’s Center for Environmental Health Coordination, said at the Aug. 12 meeting.

Frederick County health officer Barbara Brookmyer said at that meeting not all types of cancers would be looked at. The departments would focus on the most common types of cancer — lung, colorectal, breast and prostate —-as well as the types associated with the contaminants found at Fort Detrick — kidney, liver, brain and blood cancers.

Additionally, the investigation can look at cases from 2000 to 2007 only. Data can take up to two years to be verified before being added to the registry, so 2007 is the last complete year available. The census tract system used was created in 2000, and that system is the only good way of calculating the population near Fort Detrick.

“I do admit it’s not a perfect solution, but it’s the best chance we have at this point of developing some rapid, quick data, some quick information to bring back. it’s not going to be the final answer, that I promise,” Mitchell said at the meeting.

Gov. Martin O’Malley, during a visit to Frederick this week, said the state was involved in investigating the cancer cluster, but he said he wasn’t sure what the state could do to push forward an investigation into the Army’s use of Agent Orange. He said “there probably would be a way” but that he needed to look into the matter.

read online

Fighting for Frederick: Our City, Our Health community group.

Filed in Maryland | No responses yet

Smoking blamed for cancers in Port Clinton

Terry on Aug 24th 2010

Environment issues unlikely, state says

By TOM HENRY

BLADE STAFF WRITER
PORT CLINTON – Port Clinton’s rate of pancreatic cancer is 90 percent higher than what the Ohio Department of Health believes it should be for a city its size.

And its rate of lung and bronchus cancers is 50 percent higher too, according to a new state report that was issued Monday.

But state health officials said that is more likely the result of excessive smoking, not exposure to industrial chemicals or environmental pollutants.

The state agency issued its findings after crunching data of 503 Port Clinton cancer cases diagnosed between 1996 and 2007, the most comprehensive and latest years on record. The study was done at the request of the Ottawa County Department of Health, following concerns by area residents who believed a cancer cluster with an environmental trigger existed.

That is not the case, according to Holly Sobotka, chief of the state health department’s chronic disease and behavioral epidemiology section.

She acknowledged the number of cases of pancreatic and lung/bronchus cancers were statistically higher than chance alone, but said the leading risk factor for both of those is smoking. Neither of those is usually caused by environmental pollutants, although radon and asbestos exposure typically account for a certain number of lung/bronchus cancers, Ms. Sobotka said.

“There’s nothing environmentally tying them together,” she said.

There are more than 200 types of cancer, each with different risk factors, she said.

A city of Port Clinton’s size would be expected to have 11 pancreatic cancer and 61 lung/bronchus cases within the 11-year study period.

Port Clinton had 21 pancreatic cancer cases and 91 lung/bronchus cases, Ms. Sobotka said.

She said the state health department’s investigation probably is over unless more evidence surfaces at the county level. Ottawa County health officials probably will enhance anti-smoking messages, she said.

“I think the percentages can be misleading,” Ms. Sobotka said. “The findings look a lot more alarming just because you’re dealing with a small number of cases.”

Contact Tom Henry at:
thenry@theblade.com
or 419-724-6079.

<a href=http://toledoblade.com/article/20100824/NEWS32/8230402/-1/SRMAIN”>read online</a>

Filed in Ohio | No responses yet

Hamden Residents Worry About Huge Toxic Cleanu

Terry on Aug 21st 2010

By JOSH KOVNER, jkovner@courant.com

August 21, 2010

HAMDEN —The largest residential environmental cleanup in state history has begun in the town’s Newhall section, a venerable neighborhood of closely clustered former factory housing built on what amounts to a massive landfill.

The project, a decade in the planning, has been received all along the way with skepticism and uncertainty by this community of largely African American homeowners. They are tired of living with sinkholes and digging up car batteries and shell casings from the old Winchester Repeating Arms factory in their back yards, but do they don’t have a great deal of faith in the cleanup either.

State officials are confident. They say removing up to four feet of contaminated soil from the yards of 232 homes should lift a stigma that has clung to these close-knit blocks like a fog for 100 years.

The area, including a former middle school, ball fields and a park, was polluted by arsenic, lead, heavy metals and partially burned waste from decades of dumping in the late 19th and early 20th centuries to fill the mosquito-infested swamplands of south Hamden. The unfettered dumping solved one problem, but spawned another.

The officials say it will take three to five years and $50 million to $70 million, half paid by state taxpayers, to truck away the dirt and replace it with hundreds of thousands of tons of clean material. The houses will remain, but decks, porches, shrubbery and anything else in the way will be yanked out and replaced.

Some trees have already been removed; the big dig starts in earnest this week on the first wave, 22 homes.

Tough Decision

The contamination goes down 18 feet or more on some of the properties, and residents are questioning whether the 4-foot dig goes deep enough. The state Department of Environmental Protection says four feet of fill is enough to bury any potential threat, but the uncertainty lingers even as the backhoes get to roll Monday morning.

First stop for the heavy equipment: the yard around Charlie Patterson’s tidy brick home on Morse Street. Late last week, the 80-year-old former New Haven police officer, paper-supply salesman and small-business owner was wrestling with what to do. His face was creased with consternation.

On Wednesday afternoon, he said he shared the concerns that the cleanup didn’t go far enough but was ready to accept the work. Wednesday night, he spoke with the indomitable Elizabeth Hayes, the neighborhood resident leading the opposition, and after that conversation, Patterson decided to sign a statement rescinding the permission he gave to contractors for Olin Corp., the company that is shouldering the other half of the cleanup cost, to come on his property.

Thursday afternoon, Patterson got a visit from the DEP’s Raymond Frigon, the project manager, who said Patterson and the rest of the homeowners had the right to reject the service, but if they did, they’d “own” the contaminated soil and would be responsible for paying for it to be removed. On Thursday evening, Patterson went to visit attorney Howard Lawrence of New Haven, who is advising the coalition that opposes the DEP plan.

Thursday night, Patterson reported on his session with Lawrence.

“His advice was to go ahead and let them do the work,” Patterson said, adding that he’ll heed that guidance. “If they don’t do the work properly, then there would be some sort of a course of action in the courts.”

On Friday, Lawrence said: “I’ve reviewed the science and the promises made by the DEP. My best advice to the homeowners in phase 1 is to accept the service. If the state does it right, then we’ve done the right thing. If they do it wrong, we can pursue an action. In the spring, when the next phase is about to start, we can see how it went.”

The properties in the first wave have the least amount of contamination, and the DEP has promised that for this group, 100 percent of the tainted soil will be removed, Lawrence said.

Hayes, who lives in the neighborhood but does not have contamination on her property, said she is trying to get the DEP to go down eight feet and needs the whole neighborhood pushing together for that effort to have a chance.

She asked why, if the four-foot cap is sufficient, homeowners are required to disclose the presence of any remaining contaminated soil to prospective buyers when selling their homes?

“If four feet is enough, why not call it clean?” asked Hayes, who is convinced property values will remain depressed in the neighborhood even after the cleanup.

Frigon, of the DEP, said the disclosure is intended to protect owners of properties with deep contamination in the event that they want to dig down below four feet to build an addition. He said properly owners can dip into a fund being set up to pay for the removal of the deep contamination.

Other than that, Frigon said four feet of clean fill, layered on top of a barrier, is more than sufficient to bury any remaining contamination and neutralize any potential health threat.

‘Complex Project’

Richard Pearce, a popular local businessman, has been hired by the town as a liaison between the neighborhood and officials.

He said he understands the angst.

“It’s a complex project. A wrong was done many years ago; now we have to right that wrong. I’m here to facilitate clear communication and answer concerns. I have found that when I sit down with a resident one-on-one and explain the details, they have felt comfortable with the project,” Pearce said.

State health officials have concluded that there has no elevation in the number of cancer cases, blood poisonings or any other illness in the neighborhood.

A separate fund, containing $5 million in proceeds from the sale of state bonds, will be used to correct any structural damage caused to the homes by uneven settling of the fill material under and around the foundations.

Dale Kroop, Hamden’s director of economic development, said he has so far identified 51 houses with structural damage. He said about 20 of those probably will have to be bought through the fund and demolished. Others can be repaired, he said.

Kroop sees the cleanup, coupled with the repair and replacement of some of the houses in Newhall, as an opportunity to permanently improve the neighborhood. He is considering employing a deconstructionist, rather than a demolition company, so that flooring and other material from the houses can be saved and reused. He said he would like to see some jobs created for Newhall residents during the razing and reconstruction.

Some of the homes with cracked foundations, tilted walls and sinking garages date from the late 19th century.

The South Central Regional Water Authority and the town of Hamden are responsible for cleaning up of the old middle-school campus and the park, respectively. That will be done later in the project.

‘A Few More Years’

The least contaminated soil — that is, dirt that can be reused for an industrial purpose but not a residential one — will be trucked across Hamden to the town’s other iconic environmental problem: the country’s largest tire pond. A lagoon with millions of discarded tires is being covered over by a small mountain of fill.

Shannon Pociu of the DEP said most of the soil from Newhall has been cleared to be used to cap the tire pond, an operation that is in its final stages.

Tainted soil from Newhall that can’t be used again will be trucked to a hazardous-waste landfill.

Removing and replacing the soil from the 22 Newhall homes in the first wave will require 400 truckloads. The clean soil is coming from a housing construction project in Orange.

Specific truck routes from Newhall to the tire pond off State Street have been approved by Hamden police.

“You can expect a tremendous amount of activity in Newhall for the next few years,” said Kroop.

“Been living in this neighborhood since 1948,” said Patterson, who was born in North Carolina. “Guess I can wait a few more years to see how it all turns out.”

Copyright © 2010, The Hartford Courant
read online

Filed in Connecticut | No responses yet

MUSC hospital worker’s letter sparks investigation into odd cluster of illness

Terry on Aug 15th 2010

On trail of a rare disease

By Tony Bartelme
The Post and Courier
Sunday, August 15, 2010
In September 2005, a letter landed on the desk of Dr. Jerry Gibson, the state’s top disease detective.

It came from a person who once worked on the sixth floor of the Medical University of South Carolina’s Children’s Hospital. In the letter, the person said that three colleagues who worked within steps of each other developed a rare disease called myasthenia gravis.

Myasthenia gravis means “grave muscle disease” in Latin. Though it’s rarely fatal, sufferers may lose muscle control in their arms and legs and may have trouble swallowing and talking. Scientists think it’s caused by an abnormal immune response but don’t know what triggers it. There is no cure.

Photo by Brad Nettles

The Post and Courier

MUSC Children’s Hospital is located on Ashley Avene at Sabin Street in Charleston.

Gibson was intrigued. As the state’s chief epidemiologist, he runs a department that tries to prevent as many diseases and health problems as his budget will allow. And scientists have long relied on the study of clusters to identify a mysterious disease’s cause and stop its spread. Gibson convened a committee to investigate the letter writer’s allegations.

What did and didn’t happen next is a story of detective work, mystery and frustration. On a deeper level, it’s about a world that scientists sometimes don’t understand well enough to determine cause and effect, and where the outcome isn’t always clear.

‘Very uncommon’

The red brick Children’s Hospital sits on the southern edge of MUSC’s campus and is the state’s largest pediatric health center. It was built in 1987 and has rooms for patients, offices and labs. To do tests and clean utensils in the lab, employees and students routinely use a laundry list of chemicals, including chloroform, formaldehyde and other known carcinogens, documents obtained by The Post and Courier show.

In the late 1990s, some of the labs’ hoods — air handlers that vent chemicals outside the building — went down for days at a time. Still, internal inspection reports reveal few violations of federal health and safety regulations, other than citations for failing to properly label hazardous chemicals. Heather Woolwine, MUSC media relations director, said that there have been “no reports of significant indoor air problems or chemical exposures in the Children’s Hospital facility.”

The myasthenia gravis letter in 2005, however, described at length employees’ concerns that they might have been exposed to something that triggered their illnesses. The letter writer said that three employees developed symptoms of myasthenia gravis during the late 1990s and that the facility had ventilation problems that may have exposed them to lab chemicals and other vapors.

The letter writer claimed to know of 25 other workers and researchers on the floor who had immune disorders, rare nerve disorders and other health problems. A fourth employee with possible myasthenia gravis would surface later. (Employees discussed in the letter to Gibson were not identified in documents obtained by The Post and Courier under the state’s Freedom of Information Act. Officials with DHEC declined to identify the patients, citing medical privacy laws.)

The letter writer noted that the disease was relatively rare. Estimates vary, but researchers think that 14 per 100,000 people in the United States have myasthenia gravis. That makes it more common than Lou Gehrig’s disease (Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), which affects one or two people per 100,000, but not something doctors typically see.

“It’s not super rare, but it’s very uncommon,” Gibson said. “So we said, ‘Yeah, we need to look at this.’”

Opportunities, challenges

Gibson has gray hair, thick eyebrows and a reassuring voice that doesn’t hint at the pressures of his job. His office in downtown Columbia is in a building designed in the 1820s by noted architect Robert Mills, and Gibson says with a smile that it originally was built as an asylum for mental health patients. As a young man, he worked in the Peace Corps in what today is Malawi and was overwhelmed by the suffering and health problems he saw. Doctors could treat only so many people, he thought. “That’s where I got the idea that I wanted to do something about preventing diseases,” he said.

After receiving his medical degree, Gibson went into epidemiology, a field that identifies the risks and causes of diseases and seeks ways to prevent them and their spread. Today, he heads the state Department of Health and Environmental Control’s bureau of disease control, a division with responsibilities that range from preventing flu outbreaks to tracking down partners of people with sexually transmitted diseases.

Cluster investigations long have been an important tool for epidemiologists. One of the field’s defining moments happened in the mid-1800s in London during a cholera outbreak. At the time, people thought cholera was caused by “miasma in the atmosphere,” but a physician and scientist named John Snow theorized that it might be related to water contaminated with bacteria. He mapped cholera cases during a particularly deadly outbreak in his neighborhood.

“I found,” he wrote later, “that nearly all the deaths had taken place within a short distance of the (area’s drinking water) pump.” The pump was disabled, and cholera cases in the area soon dropped.

But cluster investigations can be tricky.

“Random does not mean evenly distributed,” Gibson said. “Any random pattern of dots will look like it has clusters. The challenge is to distinguish clusters that happened from chance from the ones that have causes in space and time.”

The only proven cluster in South Carolina was discovered in the late 1990s when residents in Charleston’s Neck Area told DHEC they were concerned about the high number of cancers in their area. Using the state’s then-new cancer database, DHEC researchers found elevated rates of five types: colorectal, stomach, lung, laryngeal and pleural. The pleural cancers stood out the most. Researchers found four times as many as what typically would be expected in the area. And this type of cancer provided them with a key clue: It usually is triggered by asbestos exposure.

Researchers eventually found that two-thirds of the pleural cancer cases involved people who once worked around asbestos at the former Charleston Naval Shipyard. Six months after they began their investigation, cancer registry researchers determined that a cluster did exist and that it was related to the shipyard, not where people lived.

Gibson said that investigation was easier than most largely because of the asbestos connection. Other investigations require more work, and sometimes dumb luck. He said that a noted cluster investigation began in Boston after two doctors struck up a conversation in an elevator and one mentioned that he had several patients with an extremely rare form of vaginal cancer. The other said he did, too. From that conversation, doctors and researchers identified eight patients in the Boston area with the disease. After a painstaking investigation into the patients’ medical and family histories, researchers discovered that the mothers of all eight took high doses of an estrogen drug used in the 1940s and 1950s to prevent premature labor. “It’s a great detective story,” Gibson said.

The vast majority of cluster investigations, however, turn out to be busts. In the 1990s, the Centers for Disease Control performed one cluster investigation after another without finding causes of diseases.

“They concluded that it wasn’t a good use of tax dollars, not a high yield for the cost of the activity,” Gibson said. “But now and then you learn something really interesting and helpful. So they’re worth doing if you have the resources.”

That’s why Gibson thought it was worth investigating the letter writer’s concerns about myasthenia gravis at MUSC.

“There were three people who were working at MUSC and they appeared within a space of a few years to come down with a fairly unusual condition.” If it turned out to be a real cluster, perhaps there was something in the building that was causing the disease, he said. “There are two benefits there: Maybe you could get rid of what’s causing it — prevention — and secondly, myasthenia gravis is a big mystery; nobody has really figured out what triggers it. So it’s a chance to understand what one of the triggers might be. So there were a lot of benefits: You can make people feel better, prevent new cases, and understand the disease.”

Investigation begins

After discussing the matter with his colleagues, Gibson asked the National Institute for Occupational Health to study the letter-writer’s allegations, but the agency declined. He then contacted Ray Greenberg, president of MUSC, who agreed to help with an investigation.

“Greenberg is a smart guy and understood that even if something was found that implicated something in the (building’s) environment, they were much better off finding it and correcting it than covering it up, so he immediately wrote back and said ‘yes, we’ll cooperate fully,’ ” Gibson said.

Gibson formed a committee. Because the state had no money set aside to fund such an investigation, all parties agreed to do it on a volunteer basis. Joining staffers from DHEC were researchers from the University of South Carolina Arnold School of Public Health, a representative from the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Dr. Daniel Lackland, a professor in MUSC’s neurosciences department who specialized in epidemiology. All signed agreements that essentially put them under DHEC’s legal umbrella, a move to reduce their exposure to lawsuits should any arise from their work.

Gibson said the group talked about whether Lackland’s participation was a conflict of interest because of his position at MUSC.

“If he had been the only one (on the committee), it would have been a worry,” Gibson said. “But there were a number of people on the team, and that dilutes the worry. And it was important to have someone on site. You also have professional ethics here; your job is to find the truth, especially if you’re an academic public health person.”

In late 2005, Gibson e-mailed one of the people who claimed to have myasthenia gravis: “We propose to get in touch with a very senior doctor at MUSC, who we hope will be willing to take responsibility for looking into this situation seriously … We will keep you informed of the progress!”

12 cases in Charleston

Lackland is a respected epidemiologist who has spent years investigating why South Carolinians have higher than normal rates of stroke and hypertension and why these rates are higher among black patients.

An epidemiologist has “to be comfortable with complexity and uncertainty, and that can be frustrating sometimes,” he said, and the investigation into myasthenia gravis at MUSC would be filled with both.

The first step was to verify whether employees on the floor in fact had myasthenia gravis.

To determine this, researchers needed detailed reviews of patients’ medical and work histories.

He and Gibson said that one patient was extremely cooperative but that two others declined to release the needed records or do in-depth interviews.

“They weren’t comfortable releasing their medical records, so in the end it was a dead-end,” Gibson said.

Despite the inability to obtain the employees’ medical records and cooperation, other members of the committee acquired data on medical records from the state Office of Research and Statistics, which records diagnoses of diseases throughout the state.

The database search generated some possible new clues: Between 1996 and 2005, 73 patients had myasthenia gravis in South Carolina. And of those 73, eight cases — 11 percent — involved MUSC employees.

Meanwhile, Charleston and Richland counties each recorded 12 cases, far more than any other counties in the state. That’s roughly twice as the state’s average rate, said Khosrow Heidari, a top DHEC epidemiologist also on the team.

Still, Heidari cautioned that it’s difficult to draw statistical conclusions from such a small number of cases. Gibson added that although Charleston had 12 cases, that number was still within what normally is found in other parts of the country with similar population levels.

By late 2006, the investigation was losing steam, mainly because the committee couldn’t verify the myasthenia gravis diagnoses, and therefore, whether there was in fact a verifiable cluster at the Children’s Hospital.

“There were dwindling levels of enthusiasm,” Lackland said.

The investigation chugged along for two years. Investigators learned that a fourth employee in the Children’s Hospital also may have myasthenia gravis, but they weren’t able to verify that diagnosis, either. In an e-mail to Gibson in 2008, Erik Svendsen, a USC professor, wrote that he didn’t think the numbers, statistically speaking, constituted a cluster.

“This still appears to be just a few unfortunate cases who happen to share the same employer,” he wrote. “I still do not believe that this small cluster alarm warrants a public health investigation, especially given the current economic constraints which our government and agency are currently facing — this could likely be a waste of valuable time and resources which could be better spent on public health issues which threaten larger populations in S.C.”

In the end, Lackland said the team “gave it our best effort. Even though we’re all volunteers, we were all very dedicated, (but) it just didn’t build up and get legs. Is there something we missed? Possibly. But I didn’t see it. Clusters sometimes just happen.”

Unconnected dots

In recent decades, disease clusters, especially those related to pollution, have made international headlines. A few cluster investigations have been made into popular books and movies (“Erin Brockovich” and “A Civil Action”). This comes amid a rising tide of cancer — every year more than 1.2 million cases are diagnosed — and another trend: an ever-increasing number of chemicals in commercial products, most of which have yet to be tested for their long-term affects on human health. The Environmental Protection Agency has required testing of only 200 of the 80,000 chemicals in use.

A report by the U.S. Public Interest Research Group Education Fund in 2002 found that health departments across the country receive more than 1,000 requests for cluster investigations a year and are “just one sign of the broad public concern about the role environmental factors play in the development of chronic disease.”

Amid all of these chemicals, new diagnoses and media attention, it’s easy for the public to connect the dots, whether the dots show something or not.

“We don’t want things to happen randomly,” Gibson said. “It’s a human reaction. We want there to be a reason for things.” But, he added, “It can be very harmful if people find the wrong reason,” a situation akin to charging an innocent person with a crime and allowing the true perpetrator to remain at large.

Since the letter landed on Gibson’s desk five years ago, the myasthenia case investigation has become the epidemiological equivalent of a cold case. MUSC has made extensive repairs to the Children’s Hospital. Labs on the sixth floor were converted into office space. As in any large organization, many employees have moved on. Trying to reconstruct what might or might not have happened in the late 1990s would be a massive research undertaking. Only the questions about what did or didn’t happen in the building remain.

Copyright © 1995 – 2010 Evening Post Publishing Co..

read online

Filed in South Carolina | No responses yet

DuPont finalizing lake cleanup plan

Terry on Aug 9th 2010

Monday, August 9, 2010
Last updated: Monday August 9, 2010, 9:06 AM

BY JAMES M. O’NEILL
The Record
STAFF WRITER

DuPont expects to remove up to 80,000
cubic yards of mercury-laced sediment and
soil from Pompton Lake and its shoreline in a
project that will take more than four years.

The mercury was deposited into the lake
over many decades by the Acid Brook, which
runs through DuPont’s former munitions
factory in Pompton Lakes.

State and federal agencies want DuPont to
remove the mercury because it is a toxic
metal that can harm humans who eat
contaminated fish from the lake. The lake is a
popular fishing spot known for its pike, bass
and carp.

Pompton Lake, which is ringed by homes,
also serves as a backup water supply to
reservoirs that provide drinking water to
many North Jersey towns. Many residents
recall swimming in the lake as children.

“Our ultimate goal is to do the job safely with
minimum impact to the community,” said Bob
Nelson, a DuPont spokesman.

DuPont estimates that up to 90 percent of the
mercury-tainted sediment will be removed,
according to a new work plan it filed recently
with the state Department of Environmental
Protection and the federal Environmental
Protection Agency. The latter has primary
oversight of the cleanup.

The company had initially considered
removing the sediment “in the dry,” a process
that involves damming off the work area and
pumping water out so the sediment can dry
before removal. But at the DEP’s request,
DuPont explored dredging the sediment in a
wet state and has now chosen that course.

“We’ve had an ongoing dialogue with the
agencies and experts about the wet versus
dry approach, and we’ve concluded the wet
method is more beneficial,” Nelson said.

“In the dry approach, the sheer volume of
water we’d need to pump out of the work

read online

Filed in New Jersey | No responses yet

Cancer-cluster theory on paper, rage in father’s heart

Terry on Aug 6th 2010

By Petula Dvorak
Friday, August 6, 2010; B01

It began with a neighbor dying, then an uncle who lived down the street, then all the livestock on one Maryland farm fell dead, one cow after another.

And then it hit closer to home — a wife fell terminally ill and a young daughter was gone.

The pattern became familiar, the stories swapped between neighbors sounding more and more alike: cancer, tumors, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, leukemia.

The Rice family has lost 12 members to leukemia alone.

“That’s not counting brain, breast, all of those other cancers,” said Diane Rice, 55, who survived breast cancer. “You just know that’s not right. Something is not right.”

Over their fences, at community picnics but mostly at funerals, the people of one Frederick neighborhood near Fort Detrick wondered whether it was just a horrible coincidence that so many of them had cancer.

It’s become a familiar scenario. Cinematic, even, thanks to the amazing story of Erin Brockovich, who helped prove that a utility company had been poisoning the water supply of Hinkley, Calif., for more than 30 years. A small town’s residents soaked in grief and armed to the teeth with lab reports, statistics and analyses step forward to prove that they are, in fact, a cancer cluster and not just an unfortunate collection of tragedies.

And, of course, following close behind them are the cluster-busters.

“There have only been a few reported cancer clusters that have proven to be real clusters,” Melissa Bondy, a professor of epidemiology at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, wrote in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute. “People get alarmed when they hear about cancers at various sites in an area. There have been some that epidemiologists have been able to untangle, but most cancer clusters have not been well documented. They usually don’t pan out to be anything.”

Try telling that to Randy White, whose 30-year-old daughter died of brain tumors in 2008. Now his ex-wife has stage four renal cancer, and another daughter has stomach tumors.

White grew up in Frederick and raised his family there. But when the Whites moved to Florida and began getting sick, a doctor looked collectively at their illnesses and told them that they weren’t genetic, they were environmental.

They immediately looked to their former next-door neighbor, Fort Detrick, where anthrax and Agent Orange were studied for decades and where about 400 acres known as Area B were used for storage and dumping. The EPA put it on its Superfund cleanup list last year, and the Army has been spending millions of dollars in the past decade to clean up its harrowing waste pits.

Because carcinogens have contaminated wells, “A lot of people still get bottled water delivered to them by the Army,” Rice said.

White’s family used the city’s water system, so it shouldn’t have consumed contaminated tap water. But scientists determined that vapors rising through the ground from the discarded chemicals had seeped into the Whites’ home.

“Vapor intrusion, dioxins, Agent Orange,” White said.

Enraged, he formed the Kristen Renee Foundation, named for his late daughter. In the past two years, he has plowed about $200,000 of his own money into the effort to link the chemicals dumped at Fort Detrick to decades of deaths in the community.

He hired researchers, doctors and chemists to prove his hunch that his home town is host to one of America’s largest cancer clusters. Over the years, cancer has been found in 400 people within two miles of White’s former home in Frederick, he learned.

Some of them have shown up at community forums, sharing their stories, comparing notes, demanding that the U.S. Army help pay their medical bills and clean up their land.

Now Barbara Brookmyer, Frederick County’s health officer, is investigating whether there is a cancer cluster near Fort Detrick. A community forum will be held Thursday to hear residents’ stories.

Chuck Gordon, a spokesman for Fort Detrick, said the base is cooperating with her efforts.

“It’s not Fort Detrick’s place to delve into public-health issues,” he said. “We fully support the Frederick County Health Department as lead agency for public health and are urging anyone who approaches us with any such info to follow the proper chain and work with Dr. Brookmyer.”

White, however, thinks the Army, rather than a county doctor, should step in.

A charismatic megachurch pastor with spiky blond hair and funky eyeglasses that proclaim him hipper than most men of the cloth, White holds up reams of reports when he talks about the research he’s done. He stands beside a huge picture of his smiling, champagne-blond daughter, Kristen.

“This is an environmental disaster much larger than the gulf spill,” said White, who is considering a class-action lawsuit against the Army.

But even if he’s able to prove that the cancer cluster exists, and even if he succeeds in holding the Army accountable, it can’t change the terrible health consequences for hundreds of devastated families. Including his own.

E-mail me at dvorakp@washpost.com.

read online

Filed in Maryland | No responses yet

Environmental activist urges others to become involved

Terry on Jul 31st 2010

She describes nightmare of Love Canal

Lois Gibbs speaks at the Needmor Fund on a tour stop with the Center for Health, Environment and Justice.

By TOM HENRY
TOLEDO BLADE STAFF WRITER

Lois Gibbs, former Niagara Falls housewife-turned-activist who was at the center of the Love Canal controversy of the late 1970s that led to an overhaul of national pollution laws, made a stop in downtown Toledo Friday to generate support for area activists.

The stop is part of an Ohio tour for Ms. Gibbs and members of her Center for Health, Environment and Justice group in northern Virginia that she founded after being among the Love Canal evacuees.

“People are willing to get involved. They just don’t know how to do it,” Ms. Gibbs told a group of 20 people at the Needmor Fund on South St. Clair Street.

She recalled the events that led her, at age 27, to give up a comfortable suburban life in an “American-dream community” for a decades-long fight of what she perceives as injustices across the national landscape, many of them pollution-related.

The same woman who admittedly became a government agitator was feted by Lucas County commissioners with a proclamation for “effective grass-roots environmental activism.” It was presented to Ms. Gibbs by Lucas County Administrator Peter Ujvagi, who said he has admired her tenacity.

Love Canal was a planned community in eastern Niagara Falls where dozens of homes and a school were built in the late 1950s after the city had purchased the land from the Hooker Chemical Co. for $1 in 1953.

Myriad health problems, including birth defects and miscarriages, occurred because the homes were built too close to a canal that had been turned into a municipal and chemical dump. It leaked hazardous industrial chemicals, including cancer-causing benzene, resulting in an evacuation of dozens of families. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on its Web site calls it “one of the most appalling environmental tragedies in American history.”

The Love Canal saga also led to congressional passage of the U.S. EPA’s Superfund Act. That law is intended to make polluters pay for their messes even if that means reimbursing the government over many years. Sites designated for cleanup under the Superfund Act are considered many of the nation’s worst toxic dumps.

Ms. Gibbs has visited Ohio on other occasions, including a rally she led in the late 1990s when residents of Marion, Ohio, raised questions about the leukemia cluster at the former River Valley Middle School complex. It eventually was replaced.

She is an aficionado of Toledo politics, occasionally checking in on the career of former Toledo Mayor Carty Finkbeiner. She has been in the area for various functions in recent years, including a three-day visit in 2007 in which she stopped off at Warren AME Church, visited residents of Wauseon, delivered a lecture at Maumee Valley Country Day School, met with some people in Toledo’s central city, and visited residents of Harbor View, the town near Oregon that claims to be Ohio’s smallest village.

The fund-raiser she attended yesterday was for her center and an offshoot of it, called Ohioans for Health, Environment and Justice.

Contact Tom Henry at:
thenry@theblade.com
or 419-724-6079.

read online

Filed in Ohio | No responses yet

Special Report: Delaware Drinking Water at Risk

Terry on Jul 25th 2010

What you haven’t been told about chemicals polluting the aquifer that serves Del., Md., N.J.

By JEFF MONTGOMERY
The News Journal

online videos, interactive graphics

Tainted groundwater is spreading across thousands of acres in northern Delaware and has reached the Potomac Aquifer, which supplies drinking water to people across much of Delaware, Maryland and New Jersey.

In some areas of the upper Potomac near Delaware City and New Castle, concentrations of benzene, vinyl chloride and chlorinated benzenes are so high that exposure poses an immediate health threat. Elevated levels of these industrial byproducts significantly increase the risks of cancer. Sustained exposure could kill.

Northern Delaware is home to some of the worst chemical dumping grounds in America, a legacy of broken promises and corporate misdeeds. Regulators working for Delaware and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency have long claimed that the deep clay layers above the aquifer protected it from the foul waters discharged by chemical and petroleum manufacturers.

Those assurances have proved false.

The protective layer over the aquifer, scientists now say, is full of holes.

To prevent a public health disaster, the state has banned public use of groundwater under or near the Delaware City petrochemical complex.

Toxic pollutants, though, are now moving near the edge of that containment zone, outside the properties of Metachem, Occidental Chemical, Formosa Plastics and the Delaware City Refinery, and toward schools and houses.

One plume of chemicals has traveled a mile south of the refinery’s main production area and has seeped 190 feet into the earth.

While millions have been spent to test and track the spread of potentially lethal chemicals, little has been done to keep residents informed about the threats to their drinking water. Some of the worst polluters have walked away, leaving cleanups to taxpayers.

Public health officials have barely begun to gather the epidemiological data and household research that could connect environmental toxins to the higher frequencies of lung, prostate and colorectal cancers found from Wilmington to Dover and around Millsboro.

The News Journal spent a year investigating groundwater contamination and toxins moving through the soil. The investigation uncovered a damning history of corporate mistakes and lax government oversight, especially in the corridor bordered by the Delaware River, Du Pont Highway and the Chesapeake & Delaware Canal.

The newspaper obtained thousands of pages of corporate documents, consultant reports, hydrology and geology studies, well-water monitoring reports and ecological tests on fish and plants. The majority of the documents were gathered through state and federal Freedom of Information Act requests. Most have never been distributed to the public.

Among The News Journal’s findings:

Delaware City Refinery (cleanup led by former owner Motiva Enterprises). After nearly two decades of investigation, a Motiva consultant acknowledged to state regulators in 2008 that cleanup engineers don’t know the direction or extent of pollution moving under the refinery, according to a document never publicly released. Engineers sought approval to inject nitric acid deep into the ground to neutralize a plume of sodium hydroxide. The company retracted the request after a Delaware City resident, unaware of the project’s true purpose, requested a public hearing.

Delaware Sand & Gravel (private landfill near Army Creek owned by a trust). The EPA in April threatened to take over groundwater cleanup work after discovering that bis 2-chloroethyl ether (BCEE), an industrial solvent also used to make pesticides, continues to spread out of control near a major public utility well that supplies water to tens of thousands in northern Delaware. BCEE is a probable carcinogen. The EPA demanded a new plan to deal with the threat in a private letter to DS&G, obtained by The News Journal, that has never been publicized.

Metachem Products (formerly Standard Chlorine). Despite repeated assurances that deep groundwater was safe from herbicide and pesticide ingredients spilled at the abandoned Metachem plant, EPA consultants this year confirmed finding extremely high levels of toxic contamination deep underground, some at nearly twice the depth seen five years ago. The result was drastically different than the picture painted in mid-2005, when government officials noted “no detections” in a mid-year sample from a shallower well.

Delaware City PVC Plant (includes cleanup work for Formosa Plastics, Stauffer Chemical and Akzo Chemical). Levels of ethylene dichloride used in the production of vinyl chloride have increased “significantly” in some wells near Du Pont Highway, according to a March letter obtained by The News Journal. State regulators did not publicize the developments, although they did send private letters just over a year ago to neighbors urging them to consider hooking up to a public utility to reduce the risk of exposure to the probable carcinogen.

Occidental Chemical. A consultant’s report filed with the EPA by Occidental Chemical speculated that mercury levels in sediments near the company’s shuttered chlorine factory could be high enough to pose a risk to insect-eating birds that feed in nearby marshland.

Nobody — not corporate consultants, not government regulators, not scientists — can say how badly the upper Potomac Aquifer is polluted or how long it will take these plumes of toxic chemicals to reach new drinking water sources. After decades of spills, explosions and dumping — and billions in corporate profits — most of the manufacturers along the Delaware River’s western border near Delaware City have closed or declared bankruptcy. The cleanup bill now belongs to a few corporate entities and to the public, which remains largely uninformed.

‘No fix’

Near Patti Bennett’s home, in a marshy hollow not far from Southern Elementary School, gasoline has pierced the Potomac and bled into Dragon Run creek, which meanders over several miles from Lums Pond to the Delaware River.

Monitoring tests conducted in 2006 found benzene and a since-banned gasoline additive at a level 160 times greater than the federal standard for safe drinking water.

The state Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control never reported those findings, and the public still would not be aware of the danger if The News Journal hadn’t come across the report through a series of FOIA requests.

“I kind of know what’s out there,” said Bennett, whose relatives have owned land along Cox Neck Road, south of the refinery, since the early 1950s. “But nobody has ever come up and knocked at my door and said: ‘Look, we have a problem and you might want to check your water.’ ”

Many of the documents are held by DNREC or the EPA under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, a law that allows government oversight of cleanups by active and ongoing businesses. Those cleanups, while publicly supervised, provide few avenues for public participation or briefings.

The federal Superfund cleanup law, while more attentive to public interests, creates projects that take decades to complete, with years passing between public notifications.

Delaware’s top environmental officer acknowledged that the state hasn’t communicated the scope of the problems well enough for the public to understand.

“I think that the focus of the department going forward has to be on the resource, not just on the property boundary,” said Collin P. O’Mara, state secretary of Natural Resources and Environmental Control. “We’re trying to shift that mind-set. A lot of the focus in the past has been on legal issues. Maybe we haven’t done quite enough looking at the migration of some of these plumes, to try to move beyond the legal boundaries.”

His agency is trying to develop more aggressive and protective approaches to water pollution investigations, efforts partly driven by concerns about state cancer death rates and recently identified contamination risks from other types of pollutants.

State regulators have made big strides recently in curbing industrial and power plant air pollution, some linked to cancer, O’Mara said. But work is only starting on other potential contributors to unexplained clusters of high cancer rates in parts of Delaware.

“We’ve not studied nearly as much the link between water pollution and various health outcomes,” O’Mara said. “Water is probably the greatest environmental challenge facing the state right now.”

Longtime resident Alice Wilmoth said she knew little about the underground poison nearing her home until anglers began steering clear of fishing in Dragon Run and the large tidal marsh that borders it.

Wilmoth, 83, has run the family-owned Delaware Bait Center alongside Dragon Run at U.S. 13 since the late 1940s, before the refinery was constructed over a landscape of farms and swamps.

“It’s still really pretty. I used to fish a lot in there and I’d catch bluegill and pike — the fish with teeth,” Wilmoth said. “Now a lot of people are afraid to catch anything.”

More glaring problems have been found in Red Lion Creek, a waterway just north of Dragon Run and north of the refinery and Metachem Products Superfund site. In 2007, a consultant for the EPA concluded that both adults and children would elevate their lifetime health risks if they ate fish caught from the creek.

Researchers concluded that pollution from several dangerous chemical spills had reached the groundwater around Metachem and posed a cancer risk to workers at the site and potential trespassers.

Delaware Geological Survey scientist Tom McKenna said the only thing to do about pollution in the area now is to cut off the source, clean up as much as possible and wait to see how far it spreads.

“You’re not going to stop the tremendous volume of water from moving. You can’t possibly pump it all out. You just have to be able to predict where the water is going, so folks can be made aware,” McKenna said. “There is no fix.”

Scientific disagreement

Delaware City’s municipal drinking water is drawn from the Potomac hundreds of feet deeper than the private wells and a mile south of contamination from the refinery. Most homes and developments nearby today are served by public utilities that tap even more distant streams or wells.

The EPA contends pollution from the refinery, Metachem and the other nearby cleanup sites will take decades — or longer — to foul major public supplies.

Other experts say that scientists still don’t understand the geology of the area well enough to be confident in predicting how fast plumes of underground chemicals will move. They warn that the pollution may already have caused irreparable harm.

Llangollen Estates resident Barbara J. Bason firmly believes that tainted water harmed her family in 1977, a time when the nation was waking up to the dangers of toxic spills and tainted groundwater.

The problem hit home when Bason’s infant son, Chris, grew violently ill every time he took formula made with tap water from her house just south of New Castle, long served by public wells near some of the most-notorious toxic landfills.

“Whenever I used canned formula, there wasn’t a problem,” Bason recalled. “When I had to use tap water, he had projectile vomiting.”

Bason began hauling in water from public springs miles away, and eventually installed a heavy-duty home filter.

Not long afterward, news emerged about the thousands of leaking drums and chemical wastes seeping out of the nearby Delaware Sand & Gravel industrial waste dump and into water supplies.

“People were terribly upset,” Bason said. “They were finding serious stuff in the water that was apparently leaking out of what was dumped there.”

After years of cleanup work, the Environmental Protection Agency declared DS&G under control, in the mid-1990s, going so far as to include the project among its Superfund “Success Stories.”

By 2000, a toxic plume from the same landfill fouled Artesian wells serving Llangollen Estates and thousands of other homes near New Castle. State and federal officials ordered new remedies, only to admit earlier this year that groundwater threats remain out of control.

The spread of pollution can be impossible to predict in multilayered aquifers like the Potomac, said Rutgers University geologist Ken Miller.

“The Coastal Plain is notorious, because it has sands that are relatively unconsolidated that can transmit things a long distance,” Miller said. Believing pollution to be safely confined can be a serious mistake.

“That’s deadly,” Miller said.

On May 10, 2008, DNREC banned any new public or private wells for drinking water over roughly eight square miles around the refinery. Although state environmental officials admit that pollution at the petrochemical complex north of Delaware City is vast, they insist it isn’t hurting anyone.

“Right now, nobody is using groundwater from the area around the refinery or Metachem, and we believe the contamination is contained for the most part,” said Marjorie Crofts, DNREC’s acting Air and Waste Management Director. “All of the public wells in the area are much deeper, and it would take a very long time for any pollution from the refinery area to reach those supplies.”

Federal and state regulators, though, frequently have overstated their ability to contain and control plumes of toxic chemicals. The government’s response has been too slow and too weak, said Jane Nogaki, a member of the New Jersey Environmental Federation and Clean Water Action.

“A permit to operate isn’t a permit for an industry to pollute,” Nogaki said. “With our population continuing to grow, there’s no assurance that we won’t be needing all our sources of drinking water, and all groundwater should be treated as a potential source of drinking water.”

Complex network

Around northern Delaware, the most important water-bearing aquifers are underground seams of sand, clay, silt and pebbles that settled out of tidal and river waters millions of years ago. As coastlines changed and oceans receded, the most-recent layers became dry land.

Below ground, some older layers opened channels for water sinking from the surface. The makeup and type of material — sandy or rocky or clay-like — determined how fast and in what direction water flowed.

Michael Boynton, a scientist now researching the Potomac near Delaware City for the EPA, said that aquifers in northern Delaware sometimes are more like a chaotic marble cake than a neat layer cake, complicating water movement and mapping efforts.

“It’s very complex. The environment in the past that laid down the sediments in the first place were very high-energy. River materials can move around very rapidly and conditions can change as they’re laid down. Trying to figure out where channels may be isn’t easy.”

At Delaware City, Boynton said, “the interpretation has changed over the years, and we’ve all learned that it’s more complex. We’ve had to refine how we look at the water and the movement of the water and any contaminants that are associated with the water. It does take time.”

In mid-2005, state and federal officials wrote in a progress report on the cleanup at Metachem that testing to date had found “no signs of site related contaminants” in a well 70 feet below the surface.

At the time, officials said they foresaw little, if any, risk that highly toxic chlorinated benzenes would soak into the Potomac from the soils above, where pesticide and herbicide ingredients had fouled dozens of acres, including wetlands adjacent to Red Lion Creek. Some of those toxic chemicals were found in a very shallow Potomac well before and after the 2005 report, officials admitted. But nothing pointed to deep aquifer contamination.

Until last fall.

The News Journal learned earlier this year that in September tests of water from a well twice as deep as those sampled in 2005 found four pollutants at levels up to 800 times higher than any previously reported. Concentrations of one toxic compound, benzene, were 5,200 times higher than levels considered safe by the federal government.

Neither the EPA nor DNREC released the full report to the public at large, although the findings were posted six months ago by DNREC to a hard-to-find state Web page. No public hearing has been held to examine the new dangers.

At the Delaware City Refinery, contractors working for Motiva admitted to state regulators in 2008 that they still do not know enough about the geology of the area to estimate how badly the Potomac already has been polluted in southern areas of the plant. DNREC has never publicly released this report, but The News Journal obtained a copy during its investigation.

The problem is so great that refinery consultants said they have been unable to identify all sources of the benzene, toluene, naptha, perchlorethelene solvents, sodium hydroxide and other hydrocarbons percolating under the plant.

They also cannot say how far the pollution has spread through an underground “paleochannel” that connects shallow and deeper Potomac water layers.

“Based on current data, the horizontal direction of groundwater flow and lateral connectivity of sand unit(s) within the Potomac Formation cannot be fully defined,” the consultants wrote in 2008. “The extent of the [dissolved pollution] … is currently unknown.”

Unsettling news

Some federal summaries of the cleanups near the refinery have asserted that the public has shown little interest in groundwater contamination there. Motiva provided DNREC and the EPA with a public participation plan in 2005, but since then has provided only a few limited updates to members of the plant’s Citizens Advisory Committee.

At the shuttered Occidental Chemical plant, where toxic mercury pollutants are a major concern, the public’s interest has been shrugged off.

“To date, there has been little interest expressed in this site by the local community,” a summary on the EPA’s website noted.

But more than a dozen residents who live nearby told The News Journal they had no idea plumes of chemicals were headed their way.

“It’s very hard for the public to grasp what’s going on down there,” said Seth Ross, a Delaware Nature Society member who has followed the issue for years. “If they don’t have enough information, it’s hard to have an interest.”

Delaware City resident Pamela Martin said she was unaware of problems in Dragon Run, which runs alongside the tiny, scenic home and horse stable that her family owns, about a mile southeast of the refinery.

Martin’s property includes a patch of wetland threatened by plumes of gasoline and benzene.

“I bought this property a few years ago, and nobody told me anything about that,” said Martin. “If there’s stuff like that in the water that’s going to be a detriment to the wetlands, it’s something that we need to know about now.”

Mark Summerfield, who has lived south of the refinery for nine years, also was unaware of the spreading pollution until a reporter questioned him. He said he found the news unsettling.

“We’d like to be made aware,” Summerfield said. “It might get more people out to public meetings when these issues come up.”

Kenneth T. Kristl, who directs the environmental law clinic at Widener University, said the public needs to know more about the problems around Delaware City.

“The fact of the matter is, if you have warning signs, the public may have a different view of the urgency of the situation,” Kristl said. “An industrial site is used for industry, but I don’t think that any fair reading of state or federal environmental laws says that, just because I have an industrial site, I get to pollute.”

Additional Facts
read online and see Interactive graphic

Filed in Delaware,Maryland,New Jersey | No responses yet

A Call to Action

Terry on Jul 6th 2010

Pensacola News Journal

Editorial series, part 5: A Call to Action

Measuring pollution’s impact
So how do scientists try to measure the impact of pollution?

They look at broad areas — such as ZIP codes — and try to draw conclusions about what they find. They use “models” that tell them what they might find given the presence of certain levels of various pollutants.

Related

* Four cancer hot spots in our area
* Editorial series, part 5: Sins of the past will haunt our future

In 2008, the first results of a University of West Florida study begun in 2002 and funded by the Environmental Protection Agency and the Centers for Disease Control reported that health problems scientists would expect to find from the kinds of air pollution found in this area match the kinds of health problems found here.

For example:
• Infant deaths from birth defects occur at a much higher rate — 1 in 432 cases — in Escambia County than in the rest of Florida, where the rate is 1 in 728.

• Escambia County has more hospitalizations from asthma than the state average, and that number is rising. In most of Florida it is falling.

• People in three areas of Santa Rosa County and one in Escambia were at risk of elevated cancer rates because of industrial emissions.

But, the study found, the people at the highest risk of health problems from pollution across the two-county area are those in areas along busy roadways, where a chemical laundry list of ground-level pollutants from car and truck exhaust are heaviest.

The worst area? Blue Angel Parkway near its intersection with U.S. 98 in Escambia County.

The findings match projections from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection that vehicle exhaust is surpassing industry as the greatest air pollution threat in the area.

But the findings present a challenge that comes from comparing our health problems with those of other communities. If pollution causes disease, and pollution is widespread, how do you tell what is normal?

For example, if the national level of cancer is elevated by pollution, what does it tell you if the level in the Pensacola Bay Area is close to it? If we don’t know what cancer rates would be like in a pristine world, it’s hard to say if pollution raises risks here.

read online

Filed in Florida | No responses yet

Cancer cluster or not, the reality is plain awful

Terry on Jul 4th 2010

Columnist Logan Jenkins

By Logan Jenkins, San Diego Union-Tribute

Sunday, July 4, 2010 at 9 p.m.

Three years ago, my sister died in a cancer cluster.

Or so she and her fellow teachers believed like an article of faith.

As it almost invariably does, the California Cancer Registry debunked the plague that gave my sister’s terminal illness meaning beyond herself.

If she died from something evil in the ground, air or water, my sister would be transformed into an innocent canary in a coal mine, not a loser in a lottery of random chance. Her long illness, if dramatic environmental causes could be found, could save others from the same fate.

As in the vast majority of reported clusters — and there are hundreds, if not thousands, every year — state epidemiologists concluded that statistical chance caused the appearance of a cancer cluster at La Quinta Middle School.

At last count, some 18 La Quinta Middle School employees contracted cancer over a 15-year period. More than a dozen former students have been diagnosed.

In the past few years, my sister’s colleagues have retired or transferred. To those burdened by memory, it remains a sick school, a Love Canal with classrooms that the state would never acknowledge.

The prohibitive odds are that the cancer cluster around Carlsbad’s Kelly Elementary School will, in time, also fade from the news pages.

The harsh truth is that cancer occurs often and for any number of complex reasons. Finding a specific cause, a carcinogenic smoking gun, is terribly rare.

“Don’t let anyone suffer the way I have.”

Those were among the last words of a 16-year-old Carlsbad boy to his stricken parents.

In the last six months, Stacey and John Quartarone have dedicated themselves to find out if Chase, who passed away last December of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, died because he was exposed to something toxic in his neighborhood.

“My mantra, my life, my goal is to be true to his request,” John told me.

A grieving father can’t discover a cure for cancer, but the retired librarian has collected information like a Nobel Prize winner. He’s turned the mining of ominous data into a part-time job, growing Chase’s death into a well-publicized cluster, pressuring public health officials to hold packed meetings, pressing politicians to take notice of the ominously high numbers of cancer victims.

John Quartarone doesn’t know exactly where the evil lurks — in the nearby Encina power plant? the Agua Hedionda Lagoon? the pesticide-rich farmland upon which houses have been built? — but he won’t rest until every test has been conducted, every environmental factor ruled out.

“When the scientists report that everything is standard, I’ll be content,” he told me.

Until then, he’ll push for expensive tests. Local politicians like Supervisor Bill Horn and Rep. Brian Bilbray, R-Solana Beach, both facing re-election, have heard the call.

In his story on the most recent public meeting in Carlsbad, Union-Tribune reporter Keith Darcé quoted a UCSD psychology professor suggesting that the belief in cancer clusters is often a result of the human refusal to believe that a loved one died from chance, from an inexplicable act of God, if you will.

“It’s hugely comforting to think that the world doesn’t just strike people down, especially innocent children,” Nicholas Christenfeld said.

There is, however, another way to view clusters that does not patronize believers as either mathematically dense or psychologically bewildered.

In a sense, I’m living in a cancer cluster. You are, too.

It is undeniable that the whole country is one gargantuan cancer cluster. Think about it. Almost half of us will contract the disease before we die. If that’s not a cluster, what is?

Examined from 30,000 feet, the Earth’s atmosphere is polluted. The ocean is full of metals. Processed food? You know it’s a horror story. Not to mention cigarettes, alcohol. And now we learn that cell phones could be microwaving our brains.

I could go on, but you know all this as well as I do.

In the infinite goodness of his heart, Chase asked too much of his parents. There are no perfectly safe zones. There’s no catcher in the pesticide-laced rye.

Even in a dark coal mine, however, it’s the nature of canaries to sing and fly toward the sky.

There’s a healthy garden underneath the global oil spill if only we can muster the will to scrub it clean and keep it well-lighted.

Before he died, Chase was on the verge of making Eagle Scout. His final project, which he did not live to complete, was a quiet sanctuary at his beloved Kelly Elementary School, ground zero in the suspected Carlsbad cancer cluster.

Chase’s idea was to create a place where a black Lab, an unflappable and very patient therapy dog called Rosie, would be on duty to listen to students read out loud.

The project is just about finished, thanks to Chase’s family, volunteers and local businesses that donated materials.

Rosie’s Garden will not save children from cancer, but it’s good for the heart.

Logan Jenkins: (760) 752-6756; logan.jenkins@uniontrib.com
read online

Filed in California | No responses yet

Video of “Poisoned for Profit” presentations

Terry on Jun 22nd 2010

If you missed the event in Tucson you are in luck because you can watch a video of the presentations:

“Poisoned for Profit” video (60 minutes)

Keynote speaker Alice Shabecoff is a New York Times journalist and renowned author who discussed her book “Poisoned for Profit.” Her presentation made a strong case about the immediate need for reform and she invited the audience to join the movement for a safer world for children.

NDCA’s Executive Director Terry Nordbrock, MPH, discussed the Sierra Vista AZ childhood leukemia cluster, widespread frustration regarding disease cluster response, Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) reform, and the need to shift the burden of proof onto industry that chemicals are safe before they are sold.

Pediatric Toxicologist Mark Witten, PhD, talked about his research on the effects of tungsten exposure in mice –they developed leukemia –and the need to limit exposure to tungsten.

Dendrochronologist Paul Sheppard, PhD, described how scientists can be oppressed by the legal process.

Childhood brain cancer survivor Trevor Schaefer had people crying then laughing. He talked about travelling to D.C. to meet with Senator Barbara Boxer and EPA Director Lisa Jackson about the need for better disease cluster identification and response.

Filed in Arizona,~NDCA | No responses yet

Let’s not forget the hidden costs of uranium mining

Terry on Jun 15th 2010

High Country News
By Jen Jackson

Here in the West, uranium mining continues its wobbly resurgence. In recent years, it has sputtered through the peaks and valleys of pricing to once again climb in importance and output. The graph-line of this revival seems to correspond with the vicissitudes of our love-hate relationship with fossil fuels.

In 2003, a time of cheap oil, there were only 321 uranium miners working in the West, producing 779 tons of uranium that year. In 2008, there were over 1,500, who produced about 1,500 tons. In 2006, the Pandora mine south of Moab, where I live, reopened with just 10 employees. This year, it has 57. Recently, however, it lost one. Hunter Diehl, a 28-year-old Moab man, died in the mine this May, crushed by rock falling from the mine’s ceiling. It was the first uranium mining death in the country since 1998, and the first since uranium’s fickle resurgence.

If uranium makes a strong comeback, what other such tragedies lie ahead? With the epic oil spill in the Gulf causing many to question our current energy policies and to begin viewing nuclear power in a more favorable light, the uranium industry’s slow resurgence may turn into another spike in growth. But at what cost?

With other extractive industries, we tend to see the tragedies boldly splashed across the front page of the newspaper — the massive oil spills, deaths on the natural gas rigs, or the dozens of coal miners killed in collapses and explosions. We can’t avoid a general awareness of some of the true costs of fossil fuels-based energy production. But many of the costs of nuclear power — beyond the Three Mile Island tragedy now fading in our memories — have been more insidious.

Cancer deaths do not occur suddenly, inside a mine. Instead, they happen slowly and at a remove from the time and place of exposure. The deaths occur at home or in the hospital, surrounded by grieving loved ones rather than reporters with TV cameras. The family mourns, but the nation goes on about its business; nobody makes speeches. Mining disasters are horrible, but uranium takes an even more deadly toll. And it’s not just the miners who are affected. It’s also the families that live near the mine or the mill.

South of the Pandora mine, in Monticello, Utah, a uranium-processing mill operated through World War II until 1960. Children at the time would play in the tailings piles and drink water from the millponds. People living in the shadow of the mill knew not to hang laundry on windy days because their linens would turn yellow from the mill’s dust. Now, 600 cases of cancer — a number that is growing each year — have been confirmed among current and former Monticello residents. The town has a population of just under 2,000. The Utah Department of Health has finally labeled what is occurring in Monticello as a cancer cluster that does not appear to be a random occurrence.

If 600 mine workers died in a single day, the nation would be abuzz. People would be outraged and collectively grieving. Instead, news of the Monticello cancer cluster hasn’t reached much beyond Utah’s borders.

Nor do most of uranium’s environmental impacts occur publicly, suddenly or explosively, as was the case with the massive BP spill in the Gulf. Rather, like cancer, the effects are slow and insidious. One doesn’t see uranium-covered aquatic life nearly paralyzed by the weight of its residue. We don’t witness death washing up on the Colorado River’s shores. Instead, uranium’s equivalent of the oil spill — the Atlas Mill’s uranium tailings site — accumulates over decades. Eventually, we find 16 million tons of still-radioactive uranium tailings piled up on the banks of the river, leaching tens of thousands of gallons of deadly soup into the life-giving river. But all of this happens beneath the horizon of our perceptions. It happens with the relentless force of erosion rather than the immediate shock of an earthquake.

The death of the Pandora miner last month was sudden and tragic. Many in Moab are mourning Diehl’s loss. Yet perhaps we can take this tragedy as a shout in the darkness, alerting us to the otherwise whispery warnings that surround us amid this current uranium renaissance.

Jen Jackson is a contributor to Writers on the Range, a service of High Country News (hcn.org). She writes in Moab, Utah.

full article

Filed in Disease Cluster Community News,Utah | No responses yet

Susquehanna Township residents question cleanup of 17-year-old gas leaks

Terry on Jun 14th 2010

By M. Diane McCormick,
The Patriot-News


View of the gas station on the corner of Progress Ave. and Union Deposit that is the source of gas that has leaked into the soil.
Photo: JOHN C. WHITEHEAD, The Patriot-News.

Susquehanna Township, Penn–Step into the basement of Candace and Tom Orr’s home in the 400 block of Alden Street in Susquehanna Township, and the smell of gasoline hits the nose.

It dissipates immediately, but two reminders remain: a large air filter, and a fan pumping air through a chute and out a bathroom window.

There’s also a roaring filter in the dining room.

“Try to watch TV with that on, or even think,” said Tom Orr.


Photo: JOHN C. WHITEHEAD, The Patriot-News
Candace Orr of Susquehanna Township stands next to fan ventilating gas fumes inside her home.

The Orrs are among a cluster of residents in homes behind a former Exxon gas station at Progress Avenue and Union Deposit Road questioning why the state Department of Environmental Protection failed to enforce cleanup of a 17-year-old storage tank leak that left the ground so saturated with gas that one house showed “explosive” readings of combustible gases.

“What we have now is a situation for 17 years that we’ve had gasoline in the soil, and a history of nobody even telling anyone,” said Orr.

According to DEP documents and interviews with those involved, when the agency ordered the gas station to remove the tanks, inspectors never ensured that soil saturated with gasoline was properly cleaned. The problem remained unnoticed until sewer workers last year were forced to stop a line replacement project after workers were overcome by fumes.

Seven homes so far — five in the 400 block of Redwood Street and two in the 400 block of Alden Street — are being monitored by DEP for gasoline vapors emanating from the soil.

Paul S. Palanzo has owned the gas station, branded until recently to sell Exxon products, at Progress Avenue and Union Deposit Road since 1990, according to Dauphin County property records.

Palanzo, who has signed a DEP consent order regarding the cleanup, declined to talk to The Patriot-News.

Under a December consent order with DEP, Palanzo must study ground and in-home air quality at seven properties – four have granted access, Repetz said — on Redwood and Alden streets. DEP has told homeowners that Palanzo’s report is expected by the end of June, and the agency will schedule a meeting with them by early July “to discuss the standings and where it’s going,” said DEP spokesman John Repetz.

According to DEP records, on Feb. 11, 1993, the agency investigated diesel fuel odors and found three unregistered storage tanks lacking leak detection or corrosion prevention testing systems. There were 12 tanks in all at the station.

DEP’s consent order lists nine “closed” tanks, but the agency could not specify which were removed. State officials in March 1993 saw three tanks dug up at the site, some with visible holes, and two from soil saturated with diesel.

In November 1996, Palanzo filed a remediation plan to vent fumes to the surface. In 1998, Palanzo told DEP the vapor extraction system “was being gradually installed and was expected to take a few more months” before becoming operational.

But after Palanzo reported slow progress in 1998, DEP “did not go back and tell him, per se,” to finish the job because its underground storage tank program focuses on groundwater contamination, Repetz said.

“Mr. Palanzo had a plan in place to complete the remediation,” Repetz said. “We took our limited resources and then turned them to more pressing needs. Everybody was on public water, and there were no complaints (of fumes).”

The remediation system was never completed — something DEP didn’t find out about until on April 22, 2009, sewer workers rediscovered the problem.

The Susquehanna Township Sewer Authority was forced to stop sewer upgrades in the 400 block of Redwood Street because workers found petroleum in a manhole and “impacted soil.”

“This whole area fumed unbelievably,” said Alice Frambach, whose home has an exterior sewer hookup and not a new lateral because upgrades haven’t resumed.

Township officials contacted DEP immediately, said solicitor Bruce Foreman.

“Lo and behold, when we contacted them, they told us they had a many-year-old file, which we didn’t know, and there had been a documented leak or maybe two from a tank at that station,” Foreman said.

DEP did review the situation to determine “how it got from point A to point B,” Repetz said, but he didn’t say that lessons learned are applied to current practices.

“The important thing is to figure out where we stand right now and what’s going to be done moving forward to protect the environment and the health of the public,” he said.

A call to the air quality tester, Tuckey Restoration, was not returned, and geologist Gary Calvert said he’s ethically bound from discussing investigations.

Tom Orr said testers found “high hits” of benzene in the basement and family room of the Alden Street home he and his wife have owned since 1987.

Benzene, Orr said, is “pretty scary stuff.”

Katherine Baker, associate professor of environmental microbiology at Penn State Harrisburg, said benzene occurs naturally in gasoline – making it “integral to a gasoline economy” – and is known to cause cancer.

Opportunistic benzene follows a path of least resistance, Baker said, and it can build up in basements. Finding the source in order to vent benzene directly out of a home “is like a giant game of blind man’s bluff,” she said.

“The other big problem is that after 17 years, there’s not a single big spot,” she said. “There’s a single big smear.”

Orr said the geologist studying the case has put three test wells in his yard and told him that the fuel could have gone several directions via a fault line.

Township and state officials should have told residents about the original incident and when the problem resurfaced, Orr said. He said he first learned around November that his home could be affected.

“Nobody has ever, ever contacted me or anyone else, to the best of my knowledge, saying we have a problem,” he said.

Susquehanna Township Manager Gary Myers, who met with DEP after the 2009 discovery, said DEP took responsibility for administration, communication, and enforcement.

Environmental watchdog Clean Water Action said that 99.5 percent of Pennsylvania’s leaking tanks have been cleaned, but 3,368 remain. Enforcement dollars have declined for 10 years, from the Ridge through the Rendell administrations, said Brady Russell, eastern Pennsylvania director.

“It is a really big deal,” said Russell. “It isn’t just the big cut last year. Folks want an environmental protection arm of the government to follow up. We just don’t give it the resources.”

Frank Lynch, president of the township commissioners, said he first learned about the problem in April 2009, and the township will lean on DEP to finish the job.

“We’re going to be on this situation like a laser beam,” Lynch said. “Even if we don’t have the authority to remediate or the expertise, we have the obligation to our residents that the agencies that do have these obligations make sure our families and residents are safe.”

In the meantime, Orr was preparing for the geologist’s return to his property.

“He’s coming back to dig more wells,” he said.

read full article

Filed in Pennsylvania | No responses yet

Four cancer high risk spots in Pensacola area

Terry on Jun 12th 2010

Pensacola News Journal

A study of air quality in Escambia and Santa Rosa counties calculated elevated cancer risks based on cumulative lifetime exposure to air pollutants in four areas.

Here are the areas of highest risk attributed to nearby industries.

1. Northeastern Santa Rosa County along County Road 191 centered on Florida Gas Transmission Co.’s operation.

Maximum risk: An additional 48 cases of cancer per 1 million people. But because the area is nearly entirely forested and rural, the study indicates there may be no one who has the chronic, lifetime exposure necessary to hit that risk level.
Related

* Editorial series, part 5: A Call to Action
* Editorial series, part 5: Sins of the past will haunt our future

Pollutant: Primarily formaldehyde emissions from a natural gas compressor station that operates natural gas-fired combustion engines. (A spokesman said improvements had cut those emissions by 15 percent.)

2. Northwestern Santa Rosa County centered on the Quantum Resources Management (formerly Exxon-St. Regis) petroleum and natural gas extraction operation about two miles west of Jay.

Maximum risk: An additional 23 cancer cases per 1 million people, but the area is surrounded by forested, rural land so exposure is assumed to be minimal.

Pollutants: Formaldehyde and toluene emissions from the petroleum/natural gas extraction operation. (Company officials said process improvements had cut formaldehyde, carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions.)

Update: Quantum Resources halted production from the Jay field in December. In June Gov. Charlie Crist signed legislation providing tax incentives designed to restart production.

3. Pace community surrounding the Sterling Fibers plant.

Maximum risk: An additional 36 to 45 cancer cases per 1 million people.

Pollutant: Acrylonitrile emissions from acrylic fiber manufacturing. (Company officials said emissions of acrylonitrile were cut to zero in 2006. They also noted two studies of acrylonitrile that dispute findings that the chemical increases cancer rates among employees exposed to it.)

4. Cantonment community near the International Paper Co. plant.

Maximum risk: An additional 5.4 cancer cases per 1 million people.

Pollutants: Methanol and acetaldehyde used as chemical solvents in the pulping operation. (An IP spokeswoman said controls added in 2001 and 2004, plus a production change and mill reconfiguration in 2007, have reduced emissions, including methanol.)

read online

Filed in Florida | No responses yet

BP building gone, but its medical mystery remains

Terry on Jun 2nd 2010

Demolition of Naperville research facility provides little solace to cancer victims’ families

June 02, 2010|
By Gerry Smith,
Chicago Tribune reporter

The former setting of a medical mystery is now a pile of rubble. But for Gayle Palmer, the final chapter has yet to be written.

In recent weeks, BP demolished Building 503 of its Naperville research campus where at least six former chemical researchers of what was then Amoco Corp. — including Palmer’s husband, David — developed a deadly form of brain cancer in the 1980s and 1990s.

Researchers who conducted a three-year study of the cancer cluster concluded those six cases of glioma probably were workplace-related. Yet the scientists never could identify the source of the workers’ ailments.

The demolition of Building 503 gave little solace to Palmer and other victims’ relatives who still have unanswered questions about a mystery that was never solved.

“We still don’t know what happened,” Palmer said. “If we had a definitive idea of the source, it might have brought closure, but we never did get that.”

Once, the 39 labs and offices on the third floor of Building 503 were a beehive of researchers looking for new chemical products and polymers. But after an alarming number of employees at the Naperville research campus were diagnosed with brain tumors — some cancerous, some benign
— Amoco appointed university researchers to look into the matter.

The six employees who died of cancer all were long-term chemical researchers working in Building 503. Five of the six men worked on the third floor, which was later evacuated. At least 13 other tumors, all benign, showed no pattern that suggested a link to the job, the researchers said.

At least two dozen lawsuits were filed on behalf of employees who contracted other types of cancer after working for Amoco at the Naperville facility.

BP spokeswoman Valerie Corr said the company decided to raze Building 503 because it had been underused since BP divested its chemical business in 2005. She said the building also required upgrades the company deemed too expensive. She said BP is considering turning the location into green space.

But Ed Paschke, who developed a benign brain tumor while testing chemicals for three decades at the research center, saw the demolition as a long-awaited mea culpa from the company.

“BP is finally getting rid of the problem they never admitted they had,” said Paschke, who had his tumor surgically removed and received a settlement from the company. “They are concluding the building is not safe.”

Paschke said safety precautions at the research facility in the ’70s and ’80s were “extremely poor.” Paschke said he routinely stored mustard gas and worked near leaking solvents — all without proper ventilation.

“Those kinds of things were just rampant,” he said.

Long after the cancer cluster was discovered, BP’s Naperville research campus remained controversial in the community.

Three years ago, District 200 residents protested the decision to build a middle school near the research campus, contending the site was unsafe because it was once the setting of a cancer cluster. But the site received clearance from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, and district officials moved forward with their plans.

Meanwhile, relatives of former employees say Building 503 was a symbol of the potential hazards that faced chemical engineers.

“Anytime I hear anyone going into chemical engineering, I think, ‘Be careful,’” Palmer said.

David Palmer worked at the Naperville research center for 22 years. He was diagnosed with a malignant intracranial tumor in 1989 and died at age 55 in 1997, survived by his wife and three daughters. In 2000, BP Amoco PLC agreed to pay $2.75 million to David Palmer’s heirs.

But Marios Karayannis, an attorney who represented his father and other former Amoco workers who developed tumors at the Naperville research campus, said researchers knew the risks they were taking.

“Did they know they were dealing with nasty chemicals? Yeah, they did,” he said. “But if my father were here today and you asked him, ‘Would you still have worked at Amoco and done the research?’ His answer would be ‘Yes.’”

Collette Baranowski, of Naperville, said she would get mixed emotions when she drove past the glass-and-brown-brick buildings of the Naperville research campus along the Reagan Memorial Tollway.

Though she has fond memories of working at Amoco for nearly 25 years as a research assistant, her uncle Walter Kus, developed deadly glioma while working there. He died in 1998.

Baranowski said she prefers to focus on the relationships she made there.

“When I think of working there, I think of the wonderful people that I worked with,” she said. “It’s sad that some of them got brain tumors and what it did to them. I feel horrible for their families. It just wasn’t right.”

Filed in Disease Cluster Community News,Illinois | No responses yet

Privacy issue can stall cancer-cluster reviews

Terry on May 23rd 2010

Sunday, May 23, 2010 2:58 AM

BY SPENCER HUNT

THE COLUMBUS DISPATCH

In researching whether there is a link between cancer cases and C8, an industrial chemical found in Washington County drinking water, Dr. Edward Emmett had no problem getting detailed information from the Ohio Department of Health.

“There is a process,” said Emmett, an environmental-health researcher at the University of Pennsylvania. “It is a little bit slow, but we didn’t come across any particular barriers.”

Others have. About once or twice a year, state officials deny cancer-data requests from the public in the name of patient privacy.

Last year, when a group of Sandusky County parents asked for records that Ohio Department of Health officials used to investigate a cluster of cancer cases among children in and around Clyde, the agency refused.

Story continues below
Advertisement

The parents wanted to see a map the state had created showing, at the street level, where the children lived.

“I pushed real hard. I twisted arms. I went to my friend (U.S. Sen.) Sherrod Brown and said ‘Hey, you’re going to have to intervene here,’” said Warren Brown, a Sandusky County administrator.

His daughter Alexa, 11, died in August of a brain tumor.

“They did release a map, but not in the detail we were hoping for,” Warren Brown said.

After weeks of arguing, the department provided the group with a map that outlined neighborhoods where cancers were reported.

Health Department officials also balked at a Dispatch request for a complete set of data showing Franklin County brain-cancer cases by ZIP codes. The newspaper requested the data to examine an unusual case involving a rare, deadly brain cancer diagnosed in two East Side girls, who were neighbors.

Health Department officials ultimately released nearly all the requested records. An analysis of the data did not find an unusual number of childhood cancer cases in the county.

Health officials said public requests for detailed data from the state cancer registry are often rejected for fear that the information could be used to identify patients and violate their privacy, which is protected under federal law.

“If we seem like sticklers on this, it’s because it’s our responsibility,” said Bob Campbell, deputy director of the state’s Center for Public Health Statistics.

Campbell said the state instead tries to provide data that would not identify patients.

Since 2005, an agency panel has reviewed and granted 31 requests for cancer data made by university researchers and other government officials. Researchers must promise not to reveal patients’ identities or share raw data with the public. They also must promise to destroy the data by a specific date.

That panel does not handle public requests for data. Instead, Campbell’s office reviews them case by case.

Ohio’s policy is similar to those used by other states, said William Carpenter, a cancer epidemiologist with the University of North Carolina’s School of Public Health who works with and evaluates cancer data kept by states. He said officials are often too restrictive.

“If I request any identifier smaller than the state level, I have to specify why I need that,” Carpenter said. “Right now, it’s just so much trouble to get the data, it almost renders it not worth it.”

Emmett said he had hoped to use the cancer data he obtained to see whether there was an unusually high cancer rate among residents in the Little Hocking Water District. DuPont used C8 at a nearby plant to make Teflon.

The chemical had been detected in drinking water.

Emmett said he gave up his research in 2008 because many of the Washington County addresses provided by the state were too vague for him to determine whether they were in the water district.

Columbus Public Health officials said they had no trouble getting detailed Franklin County cancer data from the state to help in an investigation of the rare brain cancer diagnosed in the two East Side girls. They also had to agree to not reveal patient identities or share the data with the public.

Tying cancer cases to pollution or other environmental sources is difficult. State officials have never named a cause of any suspected cancer cluster.

Brown said he thinks that the state lacks the resources to conduct a thorough investigation in Clyde and that a public review of its data might help. He said he can’t believe that a map of cases by ZIP code would constitute an invasion of privacy.

“We’re talking about a cancer cluster, not tracking people down and bothering them,” Brown said.

shunt@dispatch.com
read online

Filed in Ohio | No responses yet

“Poisoned for Profit” book party in Tucson!

Terry on May 20th 2010

Confronting the Toxics that Cause Childhood Illnesses in Tucson and Nationally

Tucson, Ariz., May 20, 2010. One out of three American children suffers from a serious chronic illness, harmed by the inescapable toxins in our everyday lives, and the incidence continues to climb. This extraordinary statistic comes from the just-released book Poisoned for Profit: How Toxins Are Making Our Children Chronically Ill, written by renowned investigative journalist, Alice Shabecoff and her husband Philip. A leading cause of this epidemic, the Shabecoffs point out, are the toxins in the 27 trillion pounds of chemicals our country makes or imports every year.

Earlier this week the presidential advisory panel on cancer released a report finding that cancers from environmental exposures have been “grossly underestimated.”

The good news: Congress has just begun work on a milestone new bill to test and get rid of the harmful chemicals found in our food, water, air and household products.

The National Disease Clusters Alliance, in collaboration with Families Against Cancer & Toxics, will convene a unique Tucson-based event on June 7th to present information about the extent and causes of clusters of childhood diseases, from leukemia to autism, birth defects, and asthma. It will investigate both the national evidence linking environmental hazards to epidemic of children’s diseases, and of local evidence from Tucson and other community clusters. ‘Clusters’ are significantly higher than expected cases of a disease in a geographic area. Adding to this exploration, scientists Mark Witten and Paul Sheppard, from the University of Arizona, will discuss their unique research into a nationally-significant example of a cluster of leukemia among children and brain cancer among adults in Fallon, Nevada.

The Safe Chemicals Bill now under Congressional discussion is critical to this discussion because it will identify areas that are environmental “hot spots” bearing a disproportion burden of exposure to disease-causing agents. This bill charges EPA to identify and respond.

Cancer, once unheard of in childhood, has leapt 67% over just the past two generations. Autism has skyrocketed by 300% and asthma is up 141% since 1980, the Shabecoffs found through their seven years of research. The National Academy of Sciences recently said that one out of two pregnancies will end either in fetal death or a less than healthy child.

“You don’t have to look far for the culprit,” Alice Shabecoff says. “Look at the hormone disruptors in our skin cream, the formaldehyde in the baby’s crib, the radioactive waste in the water our kids drink, the arsenic in their chicken nuggets, the haze in the air. This generation is the first to be raised in a truly toxified world, exposed before conception, in the womb, and every day since.”

Poisoned for Profit asserts that corporations often knowingly pollute, then hide the evidence with the collusion of scientists-for-hire, p.r. companies, and lawyers, while the government looks the other way. They frame their book as a crime story. “Companies that pollute literally get away with murder,” they conclude.

“More than just an immediate threat to today’s children, the toxification of the environment is as urgent a threat to the future of humanity as global warming, though it’s as yet mostly gone unnoticed,” Shabecoff concludes.

The National Disease Clusters Alliance (NDCA) was formed in 2005 out of the urgent need to identify and respond to emerging disease clusters. NDCA, headquartered in Tucson, is made up of a unique cross-section of representatives across the country from non-profit organizations, community activists, scientists and academia. Currently, there are no government agencies that either track or respond sufficiently to disease clusters in communities.

Trevor Schaefer, a cancer survivor and the NDCA Youth Ambassador, will discuss the need for societal action to not merely treat childhood cancer, but to prevent it. He and his mother Charlie Smith and Dr. Mark Witten met with Sen. Barbara Boxer and EPA Chief Lisa Jackson last Summer to describe the current failures to prevent and respond to disease clusters. This meeting was instrumental in inspiring language authorizing the EPA to identify and assist areas that are suffer “hot spots” of disease.

“We are suffering an epidemic of epidemics, with an almost constant drumbeat of alarming health reports.” NDCA executive director Terry Nordbrock explains. “The time is right for us to join together and demand strong precautionary action to protect children’s health.”

If you go:
Poisoned for Profit: How Toxins Are Making Our Children Chemically Ill
Book party and fundraiser
Sponsored by the National Disease Clusters Alliance
Monday June 7, 2010 6:30-8:30pm
At the Friends Meetinghouse 931 N 5th Ave, Tucson AZ
• Keynote speaker Alice Shabecoff, New York Times journalist and renowned author
• Terry Nordbrock, MPH, NDCA Executive Director
• Dr. Mark Witten, pediatric toxicologist
• Dr. Paul Sheppard, dendrochronologist (tree ring expert)
• Trevor Schaefer, childhood cancer survivor
No charge to attend.
Wine & Hors D’Oeuvres
Silent auction, book sales and call for donations to benefit NDCA.
For more details call 877-676-NDCA (6322)

Filed in Arizona | No responses yet