Archive for the 'New Jersey' Category

Local Swim Clubs ‘Go Gold’ to Cure Kids Cancer

Terry on Aug 18th 2011

Little Silver girl with Ewing’s Sarcoma inspires awareness campaign to research better treatments for childhood cancer.

By Greg Kulaga
The Long Branch Patch

Long Branch, NJ–When doctors told 9-year-old Little Silver resident Lilly Daneman she wouldn’t be able to swim again after being diagnosed with Ewing’s Sarcoma, a pediatric bone cancer, she was determined to prove them wrong.

Back in the pool after two years of treatment and swimming with a metal rod in her leg, Lilly’s latest mission is to spread the word that kids need better cancer treatments. Having gotten over 1,000 children from beach clubs up and down the northern Monmouth County coast to sport gold caps at their home meets this summer, early signs are she’s going to succeed at that too.

“Swimmers Go Gold to Cure Kids Cancer” has raised over $12,000 for the Make Some Noise: Cure Kids Cancer Foundation by selling the caps (which are gold to symbolize childhood cancer) for $10 to swimmers participating in the North Shore Summer Swim League and beach clubs from Sea Bright to Long Branch.

Lilly’s mom, Gerri Daneman, and Paul Buerck, who coached Lilly when she was on the Monmouth Barracudas year-round swim team, said the idea came together quickly in early June. Their goal is to fund research that develops better children’s cancer treatments, as current protocols are nearly 30 years old.

“The main thing that we’re trying to get across to people is that we need pediatric research funds because the only money we get is through the private sector,” said Gerri Daneman.

“Drug companies do no research for children’s cancers because they can’t make money on it. There’s not 100,000 kids that were diagnosed with cancer, there’s 14,500, but that comes down to two classrooms of kids a day.”

The cause is personal to Buerck, as multiple people in his life have been affected by cancer. His college roommate is the oldest living survivor of Ewing’s Sarcoma. Two students at the school he teaches at in Ocean have gotten Leukemia. In addition to Lilly, another little Barracuda, Rachel Kovach, also came down with Ewing’s Sarcoma.

“Personally I got sick to my stomach because you think ‘no that can’t be happening’,” said Buerck of when Rachel received her diagnosis in January 2011, not long after Lilly’s May 2009 diagnosis.

“It’s kind of all around me so that’s why I need to be involved and I need to find a cure. There’s no reason that there can’t be one,” said Buerck.

Daneman said she floated the idea for gold swim caps and the next thing she knew, Buerck had sent out an e-mail to the whole North Shore Summer Swim League, getting every swim team to agree to host a “Swimmers Go Gold” meet.

“Personally for me, I’m a father, I’m a coach, I deal with the kids all the time and I don’t want to see any child or a family or parents have to go through that, so if we can get out and find a cure, it’d make it better for everybody,” said Buerck.

Lilly enjoyed dancing and swimming before experiencing a pain in her leg discovered to be a cancerous tumor in her femur. She spent over 100 days in the hospital, receiving 14 rounds of chemotherapy under the care of Dr. Aaron Weiss at Robert Wood Johnson in New Brunswick. Dr. John Dormans at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) performed the limb salvage surgery that replaced her femur with a titanium rod. After extensive physical therapy, Lilly is able to walk and swim again, the only sign of her surgery being a deep scar running the length of her upper leg.

While at CHOP, Lilly met an 11-year-old named Malcolm Sutherland-Foggio, of Morris County, who also had Ewing’s Sarcoma. Lilly and Malcolm’s moms had found each other online and introduced their children to each other in a hallway in recumbent wheelchairs. Lilly had just come out of surgery, and Malcolm was still in chemotherapy.

Disturbed by a child that had died of cancer in the middle of the night, Malcolm would give his mother Julie (herself a competitive swimmer) the inspiration to form the nonprofit Make Some Noise, which Lilly and Gerri soon joined as well.

“He said ‘Mom we need to make some noise about it’ and she was like ‘wow, what a great name, make some noise’,” explained Gerri Daneman.

Survival rate for Ewing’s Sarcoma is about 70 percent for non-metastatic (cancer that has not spread from one organ to another), about 15 percent for metastatic (cancer that has spread) and about 5 percent after relapse (return of cancer). Secondary cancers are sometimes caused by the chemotherapy, which involves the administration of toxic drugs that enter the body to kill the cancer, Gerri said.

“Relapse is very severe in her type of cancer. A lot of kids are diagnosed so late because their cells are fast-growing in children so you catch cancers very late in kids. That’s why they’re hard to cure. They take the adult cancer cures and they super give them to children, they give them more toxic doses because their cells multiply so fast that they want to be able to kill the cancer. It might kill the cancer, but years down the road these kids might suffer lifelong side effects.”

Lilly’s schoolmate Jack McLoone, also of Little Silver, has childhood Leukemia, and during his treatment he suffered severe neuropathy in his legs. He wears braces on his feet and it is going to take two or three years for the nerves to come back. He has a severe limp and suffers pretty badly, Daneman says, even though he’s cured.

McLoone, like Lilly, is undeterred by the setbacks, however, and is playing baseball. Rachel has persevered as well, recently getting back into the pool to race against Lilly, Buerck, and some of Buerck’s coaches at Seashore Day Camp in Long Branch.

“The kids are strong willed,” said Buerck. “Rachel was told she wouldn’t swim and she said ‘yes I will’ and she did. The kids that have this are an inspiration and I think there wasn’t a dry eye on the pool deck when Lilly and Rachel raced, because you see a child who, they’re not going to quit, they’re not going to give up. These are very strong kids and we can learn a lot from them.”

In remission, Lilly has returned to swimming after major rehabilitation, and is competing to a limited degree on the summer Water’s Edge Beach Club swim team.

“A lot of the kids here know Lilly. They’ve watched her come in on crutches, they watched her with no hair. She’s been in remission for 22 months,” said Daneman.

Lilly, Rachel and Buerck have provided inspiration and support for Nicole Foster, another area girl from Chapel Swim Club who was recently diagnosed with Leukemia in July. Buerck and Daneman hope through Make Some Noise, they’ll be able to fund research into the prevalance of childhood cancer, which appears to be cropping up in Monmouth County in ever greater numbers.

“Unfortunately I do believe there’s a cluster around here. There’s so many kids that are coming down with it that we need to look at it in this area,” said Buerck.

Daneman said other nearby cases exist as well, but the children are getting treated at different hospitals, making it harder to identify the cluster.

“A true cluster would mean that it’s repetitive, that it keeps happening for years. Four from Monmouth County were diagnosed with Ewing’s Sarcoma and being treated at CHOP. You’re talking about 600 different kids who are being treated for some kind of Sarcoma every year, but we had four in treatment at the same hospital from this area. That’s a lot.”

Childhood cancers are the leading cause of death by disease in children 14 and under, according the the American Cancer Association. An estimated 9,100 children will be diagnosed this year. Though a cure may be years away, it should be noted that in 1950, a diagnosis of cancer was a virtual death sentence. Today, with advances in research, eight out of 10 children can now be successfully treated.

Buerck believes “Swimmers Go Gold” could be a critical part of funding new child-specific cancer research, and has a goal of taking the campaign national.

“I’d love to get 5,000 clubs, high schools, colleges, and clubs all around the United States all wearing the caps,” said Buerck. “We’re trying to get the kids to take responsibility for it. They’ll take the information to their athletic director and sit down with their National Honor Society and their clubs in their high school and say that this is something they want to do.”

Buerck says he sees great opportunity with 2012 being an Olympic year and swimming getting more attention.

“I plan on traveling a bit nationally to go to some of the bigger clubs to get some of the more elite athletes to wear the caps and recognize it, and see it we can get it all the way to the top,” said Buerck.

The broader plans may seem ambitious, but Buerck says getting involved is uncomplicated.

“It’s something that’s real simple, it doesn’t require anything more than sitting at a table and selling the caps.”

If your team is interested in getting involved with the “Swimmers Go Gold” campaign, you can e-mail Gerri Daneman at gerri@makenoise4kids.org. For more information on the foundation, visit their website at makenoise4kids.org.

article online

Filed in New Jersey | No responses yet

Cancer cluster in Pompton Lakes?

Terry on Aug 15th 2011

by Toni Yates
Eyewitness News, WABC-TV New Jersey

POMPTON LAKES (WABC) — Coincidence or cancer cluster?

That’s the question facing some folks in New Jersey, where women in one town had 38% more hospitalizations for cancerous tumors than women anywhereelse in the state – or in six surrounding towns.

“On my block 7 women have died of cancer. Three people have brain tumors,” Lisa Rissiola, Citizens for a Clean Pompton Lakes, said.

Related Content
MORE: Contact the WABC-TV New Jersey Bureau
Deaths and life-threatening illnesses that the state health department is looking deeper and deeper into in Pompton Lakes, weighing whether or not ground contamination from the old DuPont munitions site is still costing health and taking lives here at alarming rates.
“You don’t know when you’re gonna be the next,” Ruth Paez said.

Lisa and Ruth are longtime activists, trying to get Pompton Lakes designated a superfund site.

Clean-ups in some form and level have been on and off for decades in Pompton Lakes, but the latest health department report is troubling to these activists.

From 2006 to 2010, 169 local women were treated for cancerous tumors. That’s 47 cases above what would be seen as normal. In men, 118 cases, where 95 would be normal. And in women who’d just given birth, 11 were treated for birth defect related complications, when slightly less than 3 would have been expected.

Those figures higher than any surrounding towns, that saw no higher than usual cases.

“My mom lives here too. My father died of an extremely rare form of leukemia and kidney failure,” Paez said. “(My husband’s) mother died of cancer, his father died of cancer, we live day by day thinking what, are we gonna die, get cancer?”

Signs are posted, warning you not to eat fish from the contaminated lake. Pipes ventilate the ground.

article and video

Filed in New Jersey | No responses yet

NJ Chromium Poses “Immediate and Significant Risk”

Terry on Oct 24th 2010

Last week, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) took the very rare step of issuing a public health advisory in Garfield, NJ due to extremely high levels of toxic hexavalent chromium (VI) found in basements of homes.

The ATSDR advisory was the subject of a standing room only public meeting on Oct. 5 at Garfield’s Roosevelt School, which is located less than 300 feet from EC Electroplating, the source of the chromium pollution.

This meeting attendee reported that three members of her family have cancer.

ATSDR found that the high levels found in residential basement samples create an “immediate and significant risk to human health”. The risk level translates into a cancer risk of 3 in 10 (see Table 5), which is 300,000 times HIGHER than NJ’s legal cancer risk standard of one in a million.

ATSDR was created by the 1980 Superfund law to provide scientific advice to EPA and inform the public about health risk of hazardous chemicals. They do health assessments in 300-400 communities per year across the country. Since their creation in 1980, ATSDR has issued only 27 advisories in the entire country, and none since 1999.

“I asked the head of ATSDR’s Division of Health Assessment Bill Cibulas point blank whether he had ever seen cancer risks like Garfield chromium (3 in 10) anywhere in the US – including notorius Superfund sites like Love Canal, NY; Times Beach Missouri; and Libby Montana – and he said “no”, reports Bill Wolfe, who spent 13 years as a Policy Analyst and Planner with the NJ Department of Environmental Protection. “That makes Garfield perhaps the highest cancer risk site in the US,” Wolfe notes.

A cancer study is expected to be released in November.

For more information:

Health Consultation. E.C. Electroplating
(A/K/A Garfield Chromium Groundwater Contamination Site)
Garfield, Bergen County, New Jersey
Epa Facility Id: Njd002006773
Prepared By The
New Jersey Department Of Health And Senior Services
September 28, 2010

EPA documents about Garfield NJ

Garfield Cancer Risk From Chromium in Basements is Highest in US WolfeNotes.com 10/8/2010.

New Jersey DHHS Information on Garfield Chromium Groundwater Contamination Site

Bergen Record editorial asks “what took so long?” Garfield’s chromium problem

From 2005:
NEW JERSEY FACING CHROMIUM EMERGENCY – 1 IN 10 CANCER RISKS — State Scientist Reveals DEP Cover-Up; Demand for Federal Intervention

Filed in New Jersey | No responses yet

Officials investigate cancer cluster among faculty at Clinton Township school

Terry on Aug 27th 2010

Friday, August 27, 2010, 9:51 PM
Stephen Stirling/For The Star-Ledger
CLINTON TOWNSHIP — State and Hunterdon County officials are investigating a potential cancer cluster at a Clinton Township school after concerns were raised in the district about the number and types of cancer cases occurring among faculty members, according to the superintendent.
Clinton Township Schools Superintendent Kevin Carroll sent a letter to parents Thursday informing them that the Hunterdon County Department of Health, the state Department of Health’s Cancer Epidemiology Services office and a private firm have been contacted in regard to a number of cancer cases that have occurred in the faculty at the Patrick McGaheran School over the last 20 years.
“When you know people have cancer and you hear of people you know having it, that’s jarring enough. But when some of these [Clinton Township Education] Association members started bringing up a potential correlation I knew we had to act,” Carroll said today. “When a situation is out of your scope of expertise, you contact those experts and that’s exactly what we did.”
Carroll said the concerns were specific to the faculty and no students were involved. He has been assured by the state that there is no danger that would require the district to close the school and urged parents not to jump to conclusions until the investigation is complete.
“During our initial conference call it was acknowledged that cancer — as other diseases — does not occur evenly over time and place,” Carroll said in the letter. “In the vast majority of instances, perceived clusters of disease are due to random variation. It was also noted that there are many forms of cancer, each with their own causes and risk factors, only some of which are known to have an environmental tie-in.”
Numbers of faculty affected and the types of cancer involved were not immediately known. State officials are currently awaiting information collected from a recent faculty survey commissioned by the Clinton Township Education Association, and will proceed with analysis once they do.
Health Department spokeswoman Marilyn Riley said the state handles between 50 and 70 inquiries regarding potential cancer clusters each year.
“The first step — which is where we are in the Clinton school inquiry — is to collect more detailed information about the specific type of cancer each person was diagnosed with, when they were diagnosed, their age at diagnosis and other demographic information,” Riley said. “This information helps us determine whether there are any unusual patterns that need further analysis.”
Additionally, Carroll said the district has contracted RK Occupational and Environmental Analysis to perform analysis as well.
CTEA President Kathleen Collins could not be reached for further comment.
Clinton Township Mayor Kevin Cimei said he believes the school district is handling the situation properly, but was taken off-guard by the investigation.
“It was kind of been a surprise,” he said. “Anecdotally, having my kids go through the school system, from time to time you’d see someone here or there come down with cancer, but there’s never been anyone really that’s come out and tried to connect the dots.”
Neither the Hunterdon County Superintendent nor the state Department of Education had been made aware of the situation prior to Carroll’s letter.
The Hunterdon County Health Department did not return calls seeking comment.
<a href=”http://www.nj.com/news/local/index.ssf/2010/08/cancer_cluster_questions_raise.html”read online</a>

Filed in New Jersey,~Media Feeds | No responses yet

DuPont finalizing lake cleanup plan

Terry on Aug 9th 2010

Monday, August 9, 2010
Last updated: Monday August 9, 2010, 9:06 AM

BY JAMES M. O’NEILL
The Record
STAFF WRITER

DuPont expects to remove up to 80,000
cubic yards of mercury-laced sediment and
soil from Pompton Lake and its shoreline in a
project that will take more than four years.

The mercury was deposited into the lake
over many decades by the Acid Brook, which
runs through DuPont’s former munitions
factory in Pompton Lakes.

State and federal agencies want DuPont to
remove the mercury because it is a toxic
metal that can harm humans who eat
contaminated fish from the lake. The lake is a
popular fishing spot known for its pike, bass
and carp.

Pompton Lake, which is ringed by homes,
also serves as a backup water supply to
reservoirs that provide drinking water to
many North Jersey towns. Many residents
recall swimming in the lake as children.

“Our ultimate goal is to do the job safely with
minimum impact to the community,” said Bob
Nelson, a DuPont spokesman.

DuPont estimates that up to 90 percent of the
mercury-tainted sediment will be removed,
according to a new work plan it filed recently
with the state Department of Environmental
Protection and the federal Environmental
Protection Agency. The latter has primary
oversight of the cleanup.

The company had initially considered
removing the sediment “in the dry,” a process
that involves damming off the work area and
pumping water out so the sediment can dry
before removal. But at the DEP’s request,
DuPont explored dredging the sediment in a
wet state and has now chosen that course.

“We’ve had an ongoing dialogue with the
agencies and experts about the wet versus
dry approach, and we’ve concluded the wet
method is more beneficial,” Nelson said.

“In the dry approach, the sheer volume of
water we’d need to pump out of the work

read online

Filed in New Jersey | No responses yet

Special Report: Delaware Drinking Water at Risk

Terry on Jul 25th 2010

What you haven’t been told about chemicals polluting the aquifer that serves Del., Md., N.J.

By JEFF MONTGOMERY
The News Journal

online videos, interactive graphics

Tainted groundwater is spreading across thousands of acres in northern Delaware and has reached the Potomac Aquifer, which supplies drinking water to people across much of Delaware, Maryland and New Jersey.

In some areas of the upper Potomac near Delaware City and New Castle, concentrations of benzene, vinyl chloride and chlorinated benzenes are so high that exposure poses an immediate health threat. Elevated levels of these industrial byproducts significantly increase the risks of cancer. Sustained exposure could kill.

Northern Delaware is home to some of the worst chemical dumping grounds in America, a legacy of broken promises and corporate misdeeds. Regulators working for Delaware and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency have long claimed that the deep clay layers above the aquifer protected it from the foul waters discharged by chemical and petroleum manufacturers.

Those assurances have proved false.

The protective layer over the aquifer, scientists now say, is full of holes.

To prevent a public health disaster, the state has banned public use of groundwater under or near the Delaware City petrochemical complex.

Toxic pollutants, though, are now moving near the edge of that containment zone, outside the properties of Metachem, Occidental Chemical, Formosa Plastics and the Delaware City Refinery, and toward schools and houses.

One plume of chemicals has traveled a mile south of the refinery’s main production area and has seeped 190 feet into the earth.

While millions have been spent to test and track the spread of potentially lethal chemicals, little has been done to keep residents informed about the threats to their drinking water. Some of the worst polluters have walked away, leaving cleanups to taxpayers.

Public health officials have barely begun to gather the epidemiological data and household research that could connect environmental toxins to the higher frequencies of lung, prostate and colorectal cancers found from Wilmington to Dover and around Millsboro.

The News Journal spent a year investigating groundwater contamination and toxins moving through the soil. The investigation uncovered a damning history of corporate mistakes and lax government oversight, especially in the corridor bordered by the Delaware River, Du Pont Highway and the Chesapeake & Delaware Canal.

The newspaper obtained thousands of pages of corporate documents, consultant reports, hydrology and geology studies, well-water monitoring reports and ecological tests on fish and plants. The majority of the documents were gathered through state and federal Freedom of Information Act requests. Most have never been distributed to the public.

Among The News Journal’s findings:

Delaware City Refinery (cleanup led by former owner Motiva Enterprises). After nearly two decades of investigation, a Motiva consultant acknowledged to state regulators in 2008 that cleanup engineers don’t know the direction or extent of pollution moving under the refinery, according to a document never publicly released. Engineers sought approval to inject nitric acid deep into the ground to neutralize a plume of sodium hydroxide. The company retracted the request after a Delaware City resident, unaware of the project’s true purpose, requested a public hearing.

Delaware Sand & Gravel (private landfill near Army Creek owned by a trust). The EPA in April threatened to take over groundwater cleanup work after discovering that bis 2-chloroethyl ether (BCEE), an industrial solvent also used to make pesticides, continues to spread out of control near a major public utility well that supplies water to tens of thousands in northern Delaware. BCEE is a probable carcinogen. The EPA demanded a new plan to deal with the threat in a private letter to DS&G, obtained by The News Journal, that has never been publicized.

Metachem Products (formerly Standard Chlorine). Despite repeated assurances that deep groundwater was safe from herbicide and pesticide ingredients spilled at the abandoned Metachem plant, EPA consultants this year confirmed finding extremely high levels of toxic contamination deep underground, some at nearly twice the depth seen five years ago. The result was drastically different than the picture painted in mid-2005, when government officials noted “no detections” in a mid-year sample from a shallower well.

Delaware City PVC Plant (includes cleanup work for Formosa Plastics, Stauffer Chemical and Akzo Chemical). Levels of ethylene dichloride used in the production of vinyl chloride have increased “significantly” in some wells near Du Pont Highway, according to a March letter obtained by The News Journal. State regulators did not publicize the developments, although they did send private letters just over a year ago to neighbors urging them to consider hooking up to a public utility to reduce the risk of exposure to the probable carcinogen.

Occidental Chemical. A consultant’s report filed with the EPA by Occidental Chemical speculated that mercury levels in sediments near the company’s shuttered chlorine factory could be high enough to pose a risk to insect-eating birds that feed in nearby marshland.

Nobody — not corporate consultants, not government regulators, not scientists — can say how badly the upper Potomac Aquifer is polluted or how long it will take these plumes of toxic chemicals to reach new drinking water sources. After decades of spills, explosions and dumping — and billions in corporate profits — most of the manufacturers along the Delaware River’s western border near Delaware City have closed or declared bankruptcy. The cleanup bill now belongs to a few corporate entities and to the public, which remains largely uninformed.

‘No fix’

Near Patti Bennett’s home, in a marshy hollow not far from Southern Elementary School, gasoline has pierced the Potomac and bled into Dragon Run creek, which meanders over several miles from Lums Pond to the Delaware River.

Monitoring tests conducted in 2006 found benzene and a since-banned gasoline additive at a level 160 times greater than the federal standard for safe drinking water.

The state Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control never reported those findings, and the public still would not be aware of the danger if The News Journal hadn’t come across the report through a series of FOIA requests.

“I kind of know what’s out there,” said Bennett, whose relatives have owned land along Cox Neck Road, south of the refinery, since the early 1950s. “But nobody has ever come up and knocked at my door and said: ‘Look, we have a problem and you might want to check your water.’ ”

Many of the documents are held by DNREC or the EPA under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, a law that allows government oversight of cleanups by active and ongoing businesses. Those cleanups, while publicly supervised, provide few avenues for public participation or briefings.

The federal Superfund cleanup law, while more attentive to public interests, creates projects that take decades to complete, with years passing between public notifications.

Delaware’s top environmental officer acknowledged that the state hasn’t communicated the scope of the problems well enough for the public to understand.

“I think that the focus of the department going forward has to be on the resource, not just on the property boundary,” said Collin P. O’Mara, state secretary of Natural Resources and Environmental Control. “We’re trying to shift that mind-set. A lot of the focus in the past has been on legal issues. Maybe we haven’t done quite enough looking at the migration of some of these plumes, to try to move beyond the legal boundaries.”

His agency is trying to develop more aggressive and protective approaches to water pollution investigations, efforts partly driven by concerns about state cancer death rates and recently identified contamination risks from other types of pollutants.

State regulators have made big strides recently in curbing industrial and power plant air pollution, some linked to cancer, O’Mara said. But work is only starting on other potential contributors to unexplained clusters of high cancer rates in parts of Delaware.

“We’ve not studied nearly as much the link between water pollution and various health outcomes,” O’Mara said. “Water is probably the greatest environmental challenge facing the state right now.”

Longtime resident Alice Wilmoth said she knew little about the underground poison nearing her home until anglers began steering clear of fishing in Dragon Run and the large tidal marsh that borders it.

Wilmoth, 83, has run the family-owned Delaware Bait Center alongside Dragon Run at U.S. 13 since the late 1940s, before the refinery was constructed over a landscape of farms and swamps.

“It’s still really pretty. I used to fish a lot in there and I’d catch bluegill and pike — the fish with teeth,” Wilmoth said. “Now a lot of people are afraid to catch anything.”

More glaring problems have been found in Red Lion Creek, a waterway just north of Dragon Run and north of the refinery and Metachem Products Superfund site. In 2007, a consultant for the EPA concluded that both adults and children would elevate their lifetime health risks if they ate fish caught from the creek.

Researchers concluded that pollution from several dangerous chemical spills had reached the groundwater around Metachem and posed a cancer risk to workers at the site and potential trespassers.

Delaware Geological Survey scientist Tom McKenna said the only thing to do about pollution in the area now is to cut off the source, clean up as much as possible and wait to see how far it spreads.

“You’re not going to stop the tremendous volume of water from moving. You can’t possibly pump it all out. You just have to be able to predict where the water is going, so folks can be made aware,” McKenna said. “There is no fix.”

Scientific disagreement

Delaware City’s municipal drinking water is drawn from the Potomac hundreds of feet deeper than the private wells and a mile south of contamination from the refinery. Most homes and developments nearby today are served by public utilities that tap even more distant streams or wells.

The EPA contends pollution from the refinery, Metachem and the other nearby cleanup sites will take decades — or longer — to foul major public supplies.

Other experts say that scientists still don’t understand the geology of the area well enough to be confident in predicting how fast plumes of underground chemicals will move. They warn that the pollution may already have caused irreparable harm.

Llangollen Estates resident Barbara J. Bason firmly believes that tainted water harmed her family in 1977, a time when the nation was waking up to the dangers of toxic spills and tainted groundwater.

The problem hit home when Bason’s infant son, Chris, grew violently ill every time he took formula made with tap water from her house just south of New Castle, long served by public wells near some of the most-notorious toxic landfills.

“Whenever I used canned formula, there wasn’t a problem,” Bason recalled. “When I had to use tap water, he had projectile vomiting.”

Bason began hauling in water from public springs miles away, and eventually installed a heavy-duty home filter.

Not long afterward, news emerged about the thousands of leaking drums and chemical wastes seeping out of the nearby Delaware Sand & Gravel industrial waste dump and into water supplies.

“People were terribly upset,” Bason said. “They were finding serious stuff in the water that was apparently leaking out of what was dumped there.”

After years of cleanup work, the Environmental Protection Agency declared DS&G under control, in the mid-1990s, going so far as to include the project among its Superfund “Success Stories.”

By 2000, a toxic plume from the same landfill fouled Artesian wells serving Llangollen Estates and thousands of other homes near New Castle. State and federal officials ordered new remedies, only to admit earlier this year that groundwater threats remain out of control.

The spread of pollution can be impossible to predict in multilayered aquifers like the Potomac, said Rutgers University geologist Ken Miller.

“The Coastal Plain is notorious, because it has sands that are relatively unconsolidated that can transmit things a long distance,” Miller said. Believing pollution to be safely confined can be a serious mistake.

“That’s deadly,” Miller said.

On May 10, 2008, DNREC banned any new public or private wells for drinking water over roughly eight square miles around the refinery. Although state environmental officials admit that pollution at the petrochemical complex north of Delaware City is vast, they insist it isn’t hurting anyone.

“Right now, nobody is using groundwater from the area around the refinery or Metachem, and we believe the contamination is contained for the most part,” said Marjorie Crofts, DNREC’s acting Air and Waste Management Director. “All of the public wells in the area are much deeper, and it would take a very long time for any pollution from the refinery area to reach those supplies.”

Federal and state regulators, though, frequently have overstated their ability to contain and control plumes of toxic chemicals. The government’s response has been too slow and too weak, said Jane Nogaki, a member of the New Jersey Environmental Federation and Clean Water Action.

“A permit to operate isn’t a permit for an industry to pollute,” Nogaki said. “With our population continuing to grow, there’s no assurance that we won’t be needing all our sources of drinking water, and all groundwater should be treated as a potential source of drinking water.”

Complex network

Around northern Delaware, the most important water-bearing aquifers are underground seams of sand, clay, silt and pebbles that settled out of tidal and river waters millions of years ago. As coastlines changed and oceans receded, the most-recent layers became dry land.

Below ground, some older layers opened channels for water sinking from the surface. The makeup and type of material — sandy or rocky or clay-like — determined how fast and in what direction water flowed.

Michael Boynton, a scientist now researching the Potomac near Delaware City for the EPA, said that aquifers in northern Delaware sometimes are more like a chaotic marble cake than a neat layer cake, complicating water movement and mapping efforts.

“It’s very complex. The environment in the past that laid down the sediments in the first place were very high-energy. River materials can move around very rapidly and conditions can change as they’re laid down. Trying to figure out where channels may be isn’t easy.”

At Delaware City, Boynton said, “the interpretation has changed over the years, and we’ve all learned that it’s more complex. We’ve had to refine how we look at the water and the movement of the water and any contaminants that are associated with the water. It does take time.”

In mid-2005, state and federal officials wrote in a progress report on the cleanup at Metachem that testing to date had found “no signs of site related contaminants” in a well 70 feet below the surface.

At the time, officials said they foresaw little, if any, risk that highly toxic chlorinated benzenes would soak into the Potomac from the soils above, where pesticide and herbicide ingredients had fouled dozens of acres, including wetlands adjacent to Red Lion Creek. Some of those toxic chemicals were found in a very shallow Potomac well before and after the 2005 report, officials admitted. But nothing pointed to deep aquifer contamination.

Until last fall.

The News Journal learned earlier this year that in September tests of water from a well twice as deep as those sampled in 2005 found four pollutants at levels up to 800 times higher than any previously reported. Concentrations of one toxic compound, benzene, were 5,200 times higher than levels considered safe by the federal government.

Neither the EPA nor DNREC released the full report to the public at large, although the findings were posted six months ago by DNREC to a hard-to-find state Web page. No public hearing has been held to examine the new dangers.

At the Delaware City Refinery, contractors working for Motiva admitted to state regulators in 2008 that they still do not know enough about the geology of the area to estimate how badly the Potomac already has been polluted in southern areas of the plant. DNREC has never publicly released this report, but The News Journal obtained a copy during its investigation.

The problem is so great that refinery consultants said they have been unable to identify all sources of the benzene, toluene, naptha, perchlorethelene solvents, sodium hydroxide and other hydrocarbons percolating under the plant.

They also cannot say how far the pollution has spread through an underground “paleochannel” that connects shallow and deeper Potomac water layers.

“Based on current data, the horizontal direction of groundwater flow and lateral connectivity of sand unit(s) within the Potomac Formation cannot be fully defined,” the consultants wrote in 2008. “The extent of the [dissolved pollution] … is currently unknown.”

Unsettling news

Some federal summaries of the cleanups near the refinery have asserted that the public has shown little interest in groundwater contamination there. Motiva provided DNREC and the EPA with a public participation plan in 2005, but since then has provided only a few limited updates to members of the plant’s Citizens Advisory Committee.

At the shuttered Occidental Chemical plant, where toxic mercury pollutants are a major concern, the public’s interest has been shrugged off.

“To date, there has been little interest expressed in this site by the local community,” a summary on the EPA’s website noted.

But more than a dozen residents who live nearby told The News Journal they had no idea plumes of chemicals were headed their way.

“It’s very hard for the public to grasp what’s going on down there,” said Seth Ross, a Delaware Nature Society member who has followed the issue for years. “If they don’t have enough information, it’s hard to have an interest.”

Delaware City resident Pamela Martin said she was unaware of problems in Dragon Run, which runs alongside the tiny, scenic home and horse stable that her family owns, about a mile southeast of the refinery.

Martin’s property includes a patch of wetland threatened by plumes of gasoline and benzene.

“I bought this property a few years ago, and nobody told me anything about that,” said Martin. “If there’s stuff like that in the water that’s going to be a detriment to the wetlands, it’s something that we need to know about now.”

Mark Summerfield, who has lived south of the refinery for nine years, also was unaware of the spreading pollution until a reporter questioned him. He said he found the news unsettling.

“We’d like to be made aware,” Summerfield said. “It might get more people out to public meetings when these issues come up.”

Kenneth T. Kristl, who directs the environmental law clinic at Widener University, said the public needs to know more about the problems around Delaware City.

“The fact of the matter is, if you have warning signs, the public may have a different view of the urgency of the situation,” Kristl said. “An industrial site is used for industry, but I don’t think that any fair reading of state or federal environmental laws says that, just because I have an industrial site, I get to pollute.”

Additional Facts
read online and see Interactive graphic

Filed in Delaware,Maryland,New Jersey | No responses yet

Contaminated day-care site being demolished

Terry on Dec 28th 2009

By Jan Hefler
Inquirer Staff Writer

Kiddie Kollege, a day-care center that opened inside a heavily contaminated building in Gloucester County with a fresh coat of paint and little else, is about to be razed, nearly four years after state inspectors discovered the contamination.

Workers in protective jumpsuits and masks have been preparing for the demolition, which is expected to start early next month, now that legal hurdles have been cleared. State, county, and local officials welcome the removal of the building, which has stood as a constant reminder of an embarrassing and troubling saga.

“Our concern for the welfare of these children will be ever-present, but at least we can get the site itself cleaned up and ensure it won’t cause any more harm,” State Sen. Fred Madden (D., Gloucester) said in a statement. “I don’t want any more lives put at risk.”

As many as 100 babies and children were exposed to toxic mercury vapors in the former Accutherm thermometer factory, a one-story concrete building in Franklinville, after it opened as a day care in January 2004. When the state Department of Environmental Protection ordered it shut in July 2006, 60 children who were tested had mercury in their bodies.

Mercury can cause damage to the central nervous system.

Over time, the mercury levels in the children dropped, but DEP reports revealed the building had harbored vapors 27 times acceptable limits.

Ed Putnam, an assistant director with the DEP site remediation program, said the boarded-up building would be knocked down with a backhoe and about 700 tons of debris would be taken to a toxin disposal facility in Indiana. Workers are deconstructing the interior, Putnam said.

Fog spraying will keep down the dust, and the air will be monitored to protect neighbors from mercury vapors.

The process, which is expected take more than 30 working days, will cost roughly $600,000 and is being handled by Atlantic Response Inc. of East Brunswick. New Jersey will pay for it and decide later whether to sue to recoup the money from the bankrupt factory owner and/or the former owner of the day-care building, Putnam said.

“We put them on notice to pay for it,” Putnam said, noting that neither party agreed to assume responsibility.

Diane Lilley, who lives behind the building, said she was happy to see the building go.

“Thank God,” she said last week, as a half-dozen workers were at the site. “It’s been a long time coming. I want it over and done with, and cleaned up the way it should have been done long ago.”

Lilley, a longtime resident, had warned Julie Lawlor, one of the day-care operators, about mercury spills in the old factory and said that the building was never properly cleaned up. But Lawlor, who had rented the facility, said in a 2006 interview that she had dismissed Lilley’s remarks as a rumor. She said her landlord, real estate broker Jim Sullivan III, had assured her the place was cleared for occupancy.

Lawlor is now a fugitive on unrelated embezzlement charges and was last seen in Ireland.

Sullivan testified in a court hearing earlier this year that he had misinterpreted documents that said the building was contaminated and said he believed it posed no health threat. He and family members acquired it in a tax foreclosure.

A year ago, Sullivan had blocked demolition by the DEP when he denied access. After lengthy litigation, the DEP a few months ago won approval to proceed.

A class-action lawsuit filed by parents and the day-care employees accuses Sullivan, the DEP, Franklin Township, the factory owner, and others of negligence. It is awaiting trial.

read full article

Filed in New Jersey,~Media Feeds | No responses yet

DuPont Contamination

Terry on Dec 13th 2009

Sunday, December 13, 2009

Three Democratic state legislators are reaching out to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to request a meeting on a “troubling report” from the New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services (NJDHSS) that there is an increased incidence of certain types of cancer among residents who live in a contaminated area of the borough known as “the Plume.” U.S. Rep. Bill Pascrell, U.S. Senator Frank Lautenberg and U.S. Senator Robert Menendez released a letter late Friday afternoon to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson calling for this meeting of agency officials, congressional staffers and community leaders.

“We believe that the situation in Pompton Lakes is a serious public health concern and needs immediate attention,” the letter stated.

Meanwhile, NJDHSS is expected to schedule a special hearing to discuss the latest findings on illnesses for residents who live in the area where there is groundwater contamination, known as “the plume.”

On Dec. 10, the NJDHSS and the federal Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry released a report that concluded that there were two statistically high elevations of kidney cancer in women (but not in men), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma in men (but not in women) between 1994-2006 in the plume area.

To make this conclusion, the NJDHSS analyzed 13 individual types of cancer from 1979 to 2006 in the plume area. All other cancer rates were similar to statewide rates.

This report explained that since the rates for these two cancers were not elevated in both men and women, no conclusive link could be established between the cancers and the groundwater contaminants.

However, the contaminants cannot be ruled out as a potential cause of the elevated rates because other risk factors, such as tobacco use or occupational exposures, could explain the elevations, the report explained.

Mayor Katie Cole said she does not want to leave this as it is and will go to federal officials to find out more information to see if these elevated numbers are results of the contaminants.

“The Department of Health is not able to take it to the next level to confirm a conclusion, so I reached out to Congressman (Bill) Pascrell’s office to find an agency possibly on the federal level that could help us,” said Cole. “I feel that a door has been open where I feel that there is a possibility, although there is not a definite possibility that it is so we need to get answers for the residents.”

“The findings are not surprising to many of us long-time residents here. I am elated to know that some of the information is finally being unfolded. Unfortunately I think it is just the beginning,” said Councilwoman Lisa Riggiola.

Regina Sisco, president of the Citizens for a Clean Pompton Lakes group, said, “If they do a real intense study and go door-to-door to everybody that lived in town and do a history of people that moved out of the area, they will find a lot more and I wish that could happen.”

This past April the NJDHSS performed a survey of this area and initially reported that cancer-related illnesses in the Plume area are not the result of contaminants in the ground water.

“It (the NJDHSS report) is a big step in the right direction that they finally documented that. We do have clusters of illnesses in the area. If you can be happy about the situation we are happy that finally things are moving in the right direction and that people are believing us and doing a thorough job this time,” Sisco also said.

This study sprung from a request made by Mayor Cole after Plume area residents learned the volatile organic compounds (VOC) Tetrachloroethene (PCE) and Tricholorethene (TCE) were seeping into the air from the contaminated groundwater.

In the 1980s contaminants were found in the groundwater below 450 homes originating from the DuPont Company, which manufactured explosives at a facility in the borough for many decades. The state Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) ordered the company to remove these pollutants. As part of this cleanup, since the late 1990s, DuPont has been treating the contaminated groundwater on the site of its former manufacturing plant and pumping treated water back into the ground to prevent further spread of contaminants off-site.

To treat the TCE and PCE, DuPont has been arranging with every homeowner in the affected area to test the air and install a vapor mitigation system that would remove these pollutants.

The NJDHSS report explains that residents can decrease their current and future exposures to these chemicals by participating in the vapor mitigation system. According to this report, so far 368 of the 450 homes in area either have the system installed or they are preparing to do so.

If these systems are not installed, the NJDHSS has concluded there is a potential that the TCE and PCE could affect the health of residents. The report explains that if conditions such as temperature, wind or moisture change, these gases can enter their home.

On Dec. 11, DuPont’s Public Affairs Manager Bob Nelson said that DuPont is still reviewing the NJDHSS report.

“We agree with their recommendation that all homes above the contaminated groundwater Plume get a mitigation system installed to eliminate the health risk from Plume contaminants,” he said.

“Since June 2008, we have actively encouraged homeowners, in cooperation and coordination with the DEP and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, to have the mitigation systems installed at no cost to residents as a remedy that is protective of human health. We will continue remediating our historic contamination in Pompton Lakes and will do so in a responsible and science-based manner that is protective to the environment and to the safety and health of residents of Pompton Lakes,” said Nelson.

read full article

Filed in New Jersey | No responses yet

Lawmakers demand action on Pompton Lakes cancer cluster

Terry on Dec 12th 2009

Saturday, December 12, 2009

BY ELAINE D’AURIZIO AND JAMES M. O’NEILL

THE RECORD
STAFF WRITERS

The state’s federal lawmakers are asking the U.S. environmental agency to review whether a DuPont pollution treatment project in Pompton Lakes is adequately protecting residents from harm by contaminants.

R.L. REBACH / STAFF ARTIST

The call Friday by Sens. Frank Lautenberg and Bob Menendez, joined by Rep. Bill Pascrell Jr., followed a state health report that kidney cancer rates in women and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma rates in men are significantly elevated in a neighborhood perched above chemically contaminated groundwater.

“We believe that the situation in Pompton Lakes is a serious public health concern and needs immediate attention,” said a statement signed by the three federal legislators and sent to Lisa Jackson, administrator of the federal Environmental Protection Agency.

The officials also said Friday they are requesting a meeting of federal environmental officials, congressional staff and community leaders on the matter.

On Friday evening, residents received an automated call from borough Business Administrator Vito Gadaleta saying a community meeting has been set for 7 p.m. Tuesday at the Carnevale Center to discuss the state findings.

Meanwhile, the state Health Department’s findings prompted many residents of the so-called “plume” neighborhood to note many cases of cancer in their families and among neighbors. And a prominent law firm, calling on DuPont to clean its pollution, invited residents to peruse its services in defending their “right to live in a safe, clean and uncontaminated environment.”

In June 2008, DuPont and the state Department of Environmental Protection reported that two chemicals, PCE and TCE, that had migrated from a closed company-owned munitions factory were sending toxic vapors up through soil beneath some 430 homes and potentially into their basements. DuPont has assumed responsibility and offered to install venting systems in all the homes at the company’s expense. The company also has offered to seal cracks in basements.

TCE (trichloroethene) and PCE (tetrachloroethene) have been linked specifically to kidney cancer and non-Hodgkins lymphoma, according to the state health report issued Thursday. But the report said it could not make a conclusive link between the higher cancer rates and the chemicals found in the groundwater plume because the two cancers were not elevated for both men and women.

The federal lawmakers want the EPA to investigate the contamination plume and determine if the mitigation efforts by the state Department of Environmental Protection and DuPont “are sufficient to protect the citizens of Pompton Lakes from harm.”

Also Friday, the law firm of Weitz and Luxenberg in New York City issued a statement saying that the health report “on the community impacted by DuPont’s chemicals in the shallow ground water beneath their homes is unusually strong” and called on DuPont to remove the chemicals.

Lem Srolovic, environmental attorney with the firm, said, “We represent numerous residents in that area of Pompton Lakes and we are assessing their legal options in light of the report.”

DuPont representatives have said in the past that the chemicals have infiltrated the ground so deeply that a shallow excavation would not eliminate the pollution.

On Friday, Robert C. Nelson, public information officer for DuPont, issued a statement in response to the day’s events that said in part that remediation efforts would continue “in a responsible and science-based manner that is protective to the environment and to the safety and health of residents.”

Although faced with the vapor threat, all of the homes are served by a water utility system and do not rely on wells.

One of Weitz and Luxenberg’s clients is Jefferson La Sala, a resident of Orchard Street in the affected neighborhood.

“My concern is that what they’re defining as the plume could be larger and the residents of the plume are given only one option, which is provided by the polluter,” said La Sala. “We’re at the mercy of the polluter. … They’re the ones making the decisions about what [venting] system is put in and who installs it.”

DuPont reports that as of Nov. 30 its contractor has installed, or was about to install, a total of 166 mitigation systems. The company, the DEP, and the state health report advise all residents to accept DuPont’s offer of a mitigation system. But La Sala has not had a system installed in his home, claiming “people in town have had them installed incorrectly in some cases. In one the pollution was worse after the system was installed. We want federal intervention involved in this.”

Another plume resident, Charles Sisco, who has lived there since 1988, said the report was “old knowledge.”

“I’ve known people in my neighborhood who have gotten sick one after the other,” he said. “We hardly have friends left. People have died of suicide, cancer, brain tumors. This is something this town has been hiding for such a long time.”

Tom Carroll, 80, lives on Walnut Street in a house he bought in 1992, said he was diagnosed last April with kidney cancer and had a kidney removed. His wife died earlier this year from lung cancer.

“They probably should just have leveled the houses and turned the neighborhood into a golf course or something that wouldn’t expose people 24 hours a day to the contamination,” he said. “In the long run it may have been cheaper to buy up all the houses.”

He talked about the difficulty in selling his house.

“If someone’s in the market for a house and see this, the damage is already done,” he said. “Would you take a chance raising your kids here? If you heard everyone around was dying?”

E-mail: daurizio@northjersey.com

read online

Filed in New Jersey | No responses yet

PSE&G awaits agency’s decision on power line risks

Terry on Nov 24th 2009

By COLLEEN O’DEA
GANNETT NEW JERSEY

Experts disagreed whether electromagnetic fields from power lines cause cancer or other health problems, as they testified at the final state Board of Public Utilities hearing on Public Service Electric and Gas Company’s proposed line upgrade.

Shortly after the discussion of EMFs, the utility and opponents of the $750 million, 47-mile Susquehanna-Roseland project wrapped up five days of testimony Monday in front of BPU Commissioner Joseph Fioraliso. The entire board is expected to decide Jan. 15 whether PSE&G should be allowed to add 500-kilovolt lines to the corridor, which passes through Morris County.

No studies have proven that EMFs from power lines cause leukemia or other health issues, testified PSE&G’s expert, William H. Bailey, a scientist, although he did say some studies have found an association between the fields and childhood leukemia.

Martin Blank, an expert for eight municipalities, two school districts, environmentalists and a citizens group opposing the project, said there is much evidence that fields at lower levels than those expected on the new line could lead to leukemia, breast cancer and Alzheimer’s disease.

“Because of the wide range of biological systems affected, the low response thresholds, the possibility of cumulative effects by repetitive stimulation and the inadequacy of exposure standards, it is urgent that the proposed power line be moved to a distance where the anticipated magnetic fields will not pose a hazard to the community,” Blank, a professor at Columbia University, said in his written testimony.

In response to a lawyer’s question, Blank said there has not been enough research to determine what a safe distance from EMFs is.

“All I know is, the farther away you can get, the better off you are,” he said. Blank cited studies that found correlations between cell phone use and head cancers, and between an electrified railroad and Alzheimer’s disease.

Dueling statistics

PSE&G’s lawyer, David Richter, asked Blank about the criticisms several international groups have made against a report Blank referred to in recommending safe exposure levels of no more than 4 milligauss. That’s less than one tenth the maximum of 48.6 milligauss expected at the edge of the line’s right of way when using monopole structures, which PSE&G plans to install exclusively on the eastern portion of the line.

Kyle G. King, the utility’s EMF expert, testified that the median field measurement is expected to be 19.3 milligauss, but it would be as high as 120 milligauss directly beneath the 500-kilovolt lines.

Bailey said even that maximum level would be below the limits recommended by two international bodies. Based on numerous studies that looked for a link between EMF exposure and cancer, Bailey said, “the evidence does not support a cause and effect.” He said, though, that there is a “statistical association” between long-term exposure and childhood leukemia.

Saying he has not seen any proof that power lines are responsible for any cancer clusters, Bailey also discounted the suggestion by the lawyer representing the eight municipalities that the current line is to blame for the cancers that have struck every family living on one street along the line in East Hanover, saying, “Based on the weight of the scientific evidence, I do not see a basis for that allegation.”

“It’s not a coincidence,” countered East Hanover Mayor Joseph Pannullo, who attended the morning session. “Why not err on the side of caution? We’ve given them an alternate route, out of Troy Meadows and away from the homes. They’re more worried about a delay.”

PSE&G recently offered to abandon plans for a new switching station in East Hanover, but still supports its chosen route along the current 230-kilovolt lines, from Pennsylvania to Roseland, as minimizing environmental impacts.

The line — on towers as tall as 195 feet — would pass through Jefferson, Rockaway Township, Kinnelon, Boonton Township, Montville, Parsippany and East Hanover in Morris County.

read full article

Filed in New Jersey | No responses yet

Lyndhurst addresses cancer fear with new study

clustera on Nov 1st 2008

Lyndhurst addresses cancer fear with new study
Breaking News

By Alexis Tarrazi
Senior Reporter

LYNDHURST (Oct. 1, 2008, 11:30 a.m.) — As the personal crusade of Lorraine Colabella — a former Lyndhurst resident diagnosed with multiple myeloma — gains national attention, more concerns and questions continue to arise over the state’s recent cancer study in the area. In an effort to address the anxiety, the Lyndhurst Health Department recently asked a state agency to conduct another in-depth study of the area.

The results from this study find that multiple myeloma and all cancers are “not statistically significantly elevated” in Lyndhurst, according to a press release.

However, despite the results, Floyd Sands, director of field operations for the National Disease Cluster Alliance (a nonprofit that has recently joined Colabella’s crusade), has his doubts.

“No state cancer registry has ever identified a cancer cluster as that cluster was ongoing … never,” Sands wrote in an e-mail. “Cancer clusters are most often identified and exposed by the people experiencing them.”

The study originated after Health Administrator Joyce Jacobson, under the direction of Mayor Richard DiLascio, contacted the state Department of Health and Senior Services requesting an in-depth analysis — specifically, a standardized incidence ratio (SIR) — to be performed by the state Cancer Epidemiology Services.

“Multiple myeloma is not disproportionately affecting younger people in Lyndhurst, as has been questioned,” according to Dr. Christina Tan, acting state epidemiologist. “Only 19 percent of Lyndhurst residents diagnosed with multiple myeloma (1990-2005) were under the age of 65, compared to the American Cancer Society statistic stating that 34 percent of multiple myeloma cases are diagnosed under the age of 65.”

Using information from the New Jersey State Cancer Registry, the study looked at current and former residents who have been diagnosed.

However, this data would seemingly leave out Colabella’s case, as she was diagnosed in South Carolina.

Sands still has his doubts.

“ ‘Statistical significance’ is a device which is often used to muddy otherwise clear waters in the discussion of disease-impacted communities,” Sands wrote. “The definition of SIR is not rooted in science or mathematics; its use is arbitrary and capricious and amounts to nothing more than a ‘plug’ number.  SIR is often employed as a device by which to devolve the discussion from one of human suffering and death to one of statistics. The Lyndhurst discussion is not one about statistics; it is one about the human condition there.”
The future

Jacobson stated in the release that the health department is working with the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry and the NJDHSS Hazardous Site Health Evaluation Program to answer questions about environmental concerns related to the former site of Penick Corp., a manufacturer of pharmaceuticals, botanical extracts and pesticides, that used to be located on New York Avenue in the 1940s.

“They are reviewing data, will speak with the public and will provide a written report with recommendations,” Jacobson stated.

Colabella’s study

Colabella — diagnosed with multiple myeloma five years ago — began her crusade after posting a brief announcement in The Leader and receiving hundreds of responses.

Jacobson subsequently had the state CES conduct a study, and the results indicated the cancer rate in Lyndhurst is comparable to that of similar surrounding municipalities.

However, Colabella pushed forward and gained the attention of the NDCA and cancer cluster activist Erin Brockovich.

For any residents in the surrounding area who know of someone who has, or has had multiple myeloma, a rare cancer or any type of cancer, Colabella is asking them to contact lcolabella@gmail.com or write to PO Box 166, Marlton, NJ 08053. She asks respondents to include the year of diagnosis, age, gender and location.

Filed in New Jersey | No responses yet

Lyndhurst addresses cancer fear with new study

Dee Lewis on Oct 3rd 2008

Breaking News 

By Alexis Tarrazi
Senior Reporter

LYNDHURST (Oct. 1, 2008, 11:30 a.m.) — As the personal crusade of Lorraine Colabella — a former Lyndhurst resident diagnosed with multiple myeloma — gains national attention, more concerns and questions continue to arise over the state’s recent cancer study in the area. In an effort to address the anxiety, the Lyndhurst Health Department recently asked a state agency to conduct another in-depth study of the area.

The results from this study find that multiple myeloma and all cancers are “not statistically significantly elevated” in Lyndhurst, according to a press release.

However, despite the results, Floyd Sands, director of field operations for the National Disease Cluster Alliance (a nonprofit that has recently joined Colabella’s crusade), has his doubts.

“No state cancer registry has ever identified a cancer cluster as that cluster was ongoing … never,” Sands wrote in an e-mail. “Cancer clusters are most often identified and exposed by the people experiencing them.”

The study originated after Health Administrator Joyce Jacobson, under the direction of Mayor Richard DiLascio, contacted the state Department of Health and Senior Services requesting an in-depth analysis — specifically, a standardized incidence ratio (SIR) — to be performed by the state Cancer Epidemiology Services.

“Multiple myeloma is not disproportionately affecting younger people in Lyndhurst, as has been questioned,” according to Dr. Christina Tan, acting state epidemiologist. “Only 19 percent of Lyndhurst residents diagnosed with multiple myeloma (1990-2005) were under the age of 65, compared to the American Cancer Society statistic stating that 34 percent of multiple myeloma cases are diagnosed under the age of 65.”

Using information from the New Jersey State Cancer Registry, the study looked at current and former residents who have been diagnosed.

However, this data would seemingly leave out Colabella’s case, as she was diagnosed in South Carolina.

Sands still has his doubts.

“ ‘Statistical significance’ is a device which is often used to muddy otherwise clear waters in the discussion of disease-impacted communities,” Sands wrote. “The definition of SIR is not rooted in science or mathematics; its use is arbitrary and capricious and amounts to nothing more than a ‘plug’ number.  SIR is often employed as a device by which to devolve the discussion from one of human suffering and death to one of statistics. The Lyndhurst discussion is not one about statistics; it is one about the human condition there.”
The future

Jacobson stated in the release that the health department is working with the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry and the NJDHSS Hazardous Site Health Evaluation Program to answer questions about environmental concerns related to the former site of Penick Corp., a manufacturer of pharmaceuticals, botanical extracts and pesticides, that used to be located on New York Avenue in the 1940s.

“They are reviewing data, will speak with the public and will provide a written report with recommendations,” Jacobson stated.
Colabella’s study

Colabella — diagnosed with multiple myeloma five years ago — began her crusade after posting a brief announcement in The Leader and receiving hundreds of responses.

Jacobson subsequently had the state CES conduct a study, and the results indicated the cancer rate in Lyndhurst is comparable to that of similar surrounding municipalities.

However, Colabella pushed forward and gained the attention of the NDCA and cancer cluster activist Erin Brockovich.

For any residents in the surrounding area who know of someone who has, or has had multiple myeloma, a rare cancer or any type of cancer, Colabella is asking them to contact lcolabella@gmail.com or write to PO Box 166, Marlton, NJ 08053. She asks respondents to include the year of diagnosis, age, gender and location.

 

Filed in New Jersey | No responses yet

Local cancer study gains national attention

Dee Lewis on Sep 28th 2008

  

Local cancer study gains national attention
Date: Thursday, August 28 @ 11:39:36 MDT
Topic: Breaking News

 

By Alexis Tarrazi
Senior Reporter

LYNDHURST (Aug. 28, 2008, 1:40 p.m.) — The local crusade of Lorraine Colabella, the former Lyndhurst resident who is suffering from incurable multiple myeloma, recently spread to the national level when the National Disease Cluster Alliance shined its spotlight on her personal cancer cluster study.

Acting as a guide, the alliance hopes to steer Colabella’s study in the right direction, by gaining attention and educating the people involved, according to Floyd Sands, director of field operations for NDCA, a nonprofit organization that helps disease-impacted communities.

Click READ MORE for the complete story.

By Alexis Tarrazi
Senior Reporter

LYNDHURST (Aug. 28, 2008, 1:40 p.m.) — The local crusade of Lorraine Colabella, the former Lyndhurst resident who is suffering from incurable multiple myeloma, recently spread to the national level when the National Disease Cluster Alliance shined its spotlight on her personal cancer cluster study.

Acting as a guide, the alliance hopes to steer Colabella’s study in the right direction, by gaining attention and educating the people involved, according to Floyd Sands, director of field operations for NDCA, a nonprofit organization that helps disease-impacted communities.

The alliance works with towns that appear to be impacted by excessive disease cases, by educating, mentoring, advising and facilitating with and on behalf of the communities.

The alliance will not step in and take over Colabella’s study, Sands added, but it will help her gather information on how to gain publicity and conduct the study efficiently.

“The NDCA is working to guide us and educate us, and other board members — a unique cross section of  representatives such as epidemiologists, Ph.D.s, scientists, academia and community activists — will be in touch,” Colabella stated in an e-mail. “They have done this before, and they know the ins and outs and we don’t. I am following them to the letter.”

Colabella, who is also being helped by well-known activist Erin Brockovich, is currently working on a publicity video, which will air on the popular YouTube Web site. The purpose of the video and other publicity attempts is to not only inform the public, but to gain attention from state agencies.

“Lorraine is asking questions to which Lorraine deserves answers,” Sands said.

When The Leader contacted the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency about becoming involved in Colabella’s case, spokeswoman Elizabeth Totman said the agency would only test a potential area if the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection had asked the federal agency to become involved. Totman said the DEP would only get involved at the request of the state Department of Health.

Sands noted that this is a typical response from agencies, which is why the alliance urges publicity to bring more light to the situation.

Colabella — diagnosed with multiple myeloma five years ago — began her crusade after becoming concerned over the cancer rate in the local area.

After posting a brief announcement in The Leader and receiving hundreds of responses, Lyndhurst Health Administrator Joyce Jacobson had the New Jersey Cancer Epidemiology Services conduct a study. The results indicated the cancer rate in Lyndhurst is comparable to that of similar surrounding municipalities.

But Colabella believes the study should be expanded. “There are many ways to look at the statistics,” Colabella stated in an e-mail. “I was diagnosed in South Carolina, but came to Hackensack to be treated. I would not be included in their statistical findings of the number of multiple myeloma cases in Lyndhurst.”
Other stories

June Conzo, who resides on Lyndhurst Avenue, said 18 people in her family grew up in the township and were all diagnosed with some sort of cancer.

“My brother, sister and mom all were diagnosed with lung cancer,” she said.

Conzo listed other family members, including uncles, a grandfather and even her husband, who was diagnosed with colon cancer.

Rosemary Groszman, another Lyndhurst resident, also contacted Colabella with information after she grew concerned with the number of cancer patients on her street, Fifth Avenue.

“To me, the whole thing is ironic, because the street I grew up on had so many cancer patients,” Groszman said. “There were about 12 to 14 people on Fifth Avenue.”

Groszman said she was diagnosed with colon, kidney, liver and lung cancer.

“I am 72 years old, and I came here as a young child,” Groszman said. “At that time, the meadows were a garbage dump. … I just wonder whether some chemicals or trash dumped there affected the area. I think New Jersey itself, with the number of chemical plants we have and the small area with a lot of cars could be a combination of factors for the cancer.”

Sands said these stories matter. “Communities usually feel they are powerless, when in truth the community and the members are the only entities involved in the disease cluster that have any true power,” Sands said.

For any residents in the surrounding area who know of someone who has, or has had multiple myeloma, a rare cancer or any type of cancer, Colabella is asking them to contact lcolabella@gmail.com or write to PO Box 166, Marlton, NJ 08053. She asks respondents to include the year of diagnosis, age, gender and location.

For more information on the National Disease Cluster Alliance, visit www.clusteralliance.org.

 

Filed in Disease Cluster Community News,New Jersey | No responses yet

Hopewell Council gets Rockwell plan update Rockwell Automation has no immediate plans to sell Somerset properties and is unconcerned about possible rezoning in the area

Dee Lewis on Jul 19th 2008


Hopewell Council gets Rockwell plan update

Rockwell Automation has no immediate plans to sell Somerset properties and is unconcerned about possible rezoning in the area

By Aleen Crispino, Special Writer

Posted: Thursday, July 10, 2008 11:19 AM EDT

   Representatives of Rockwell Automation — owner of at least four and possibly seven vacant residential properties on the south side of Somerset Street in Hopewell Borough — say the company has no immediate plans to sell the properties and is unconcerned with the possibility, being explored by the borough Planning Board, of rezoning.

   This information was reported by Councilman David Mackie and Borough Administrator/Clerk Michele Hovan to Hopewell Borough Council at its regular meeting Monday.

   Rockwell intends to apply to the Planning Board for permits to demolish the remaining homes on the properties, then “plant some trees and landscaping and maintain them as residential properties until the (groundwater) treatment is finished,” said Councilman Mackie.

   In a conference call Monday with Jennifer Elder Brady, project manager at the Cranbury-based environmental engineering firm Arcadis BBL, and John Persico, Arcadis BBL associate, Ms. Hovan and Councilman Mackie received an informal update on plans by the firm, hired by Rockwell Automation of Milwaukee, Wis., to build a groundwater treatment facility at 21 and 29 Somerset St. and to maintain the property surrounding it.

   ”They said their general procedure is they complete the remediation and then divest themselves of the property,” said Councilman Mackie. Exactly how long it will take to pump out and treat all of the contaminated groundwater is unknown. The project could be completed in “five, 10, 15, 20 years,” said Ms. Brady in June 2007.

   Rockwell Automation, which, as Rockwell Manufacturing Co., operated a plant at 57 Hamilton Ave. from the early 1900s to 1975, has been ordered by the state Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) to clean up air, soil and groundwater contamination by “volatile organic compounds,” primarily trichloroethene (TCE), in an area extending from Somerset Street south to Lafayette Street and from Hamilton Avenue east to The King’s Path development in Hopewell Township.

   As part of its effort to remediate the site, Rockwell has purchased two residential properties: 19 and 21 Somerset St., and has already demolished houses and felled trees in order to remove contaminated soil at these locations. In addition, the company has either purchased or is in the process of purchasing the five remaining homes on the south side of Somerset that lie within the borough, Mr. Persico said Dec. 20. The borough has received copies of deeds for 29 and 37 Somerset St., indicating that those sales have been completed, said Ms. Hovan in May.

   Rockwell plans to build a recovery well and an approximately 60- by 40-foot Cape Cod-style treatment building, constructed of pre-engineered metal, at 21 and 29 Somerset St., said Ms. Brady in December 2007. Before doing so, it would need to present an application and site plan and receive the approval of the borough Planning Board. Demolition of any of the remaining houses also would require approval from the board.

   At its last few meetings, the Planning Board has been holding public discussions of the 2007 Master Plan recommendation that the south side of Somerset Street be rezoned for commercial or industrial use. This recommendation was triggered by Rockwell’s purchase of the residential properties for its treatment facility as well as future plans by New Jersey Transit to create a railroad parking lot on the north side of the street for a reactivated West Trenton Line.

   Members of the Hopewell Woods Homeowners Association, whose members reside on Elm Street and whose back yards are adjacent to the south side of Somerset Street, have publicly opposed rezoning for anything other than park or recreation use, and have stated their desire to keep the south side of the street residential.

   Richard Friedman, of 31 Elm St., president of the association, presented the board Dec. 12 with a letter citing homeowners’ fears that rezoning would “adversely affect the quality of life on our street and in surrounding neighborhoods,” as well as that “this action would have a negative impact on property values,” which have “already suffered due to Rockwell’s pollution of the groundwater and soil in the Somerset Street area.”

   The Planning Board has said its main concern is to prevent unwanted use of the properties upon possible future sale by Rockwell. “My overriding concern is to be able to control what happens there,” said Planning Board Chairman Bob Donaldson in May, describing a possible scenario where the land is sold to a developer wishing to build townhouses or condominiums.

   Councilman Mackie said the views of neighborhood residents might be a factor in Rockwell’s future plans. “They’ve had some conversations with residents of Elm Street,” said Mr. Mackie, adding that this may have influenced the decision of company representatives to maintain the residential character of the property for the duration of the remediation effort.

   IN OTHER BUSINESS, council postponed a public hearing on the proposed 2008 budget to 7 p.m. today (Thursday) in the Hopewell Fire Department conference room on the first floor of the Municipal Building at 4 Columbia Ave.

Filed in New Jersey | No responses yet

One type of cancer is double N.J. rate

Dee Lewis on Apr 20th 2008

March 12, 2008

One type of cancer is double N.J. rate

Sarcoma cases in Toms River

By LAUREN O. KIDD
TOMS RIVER BUREAU


The incidences of childhood cancer that occurred in Toms River from 2001 through 2005 were on par with what was expected to occur in a township of its size in New Jersey, but the diagnosis of one certain class of cancer — soft tissue sarcoma — was more than twice the expected rate, a state Department of Health and Senior Services analysis found.

The analysis compared the number of cases observed and how they occurred here with the number of cases expected to occur in a population of the township’s size over that period. Toms River’s population was about 93,000 in 2004, according to the U.S. Census.

Incidences of soft tissue sarcoma — defined by the National Cancer Institute as “a cancer that begins in the muscle, fat, fibrous tissue, blood vessels, or other supporting tissue of the body” — were more than double the expected rate, according to the study.

Four Toms River children were diagnosed with soft tissue sarcomas between 2004 and 2005. Three of those children are girls, which is statistically more than five times as many girls than would be expected to be diagnosed with the disease, Jerald A. Fagliano, program manager for consumer and environmental health with the Department of Health and Senior Services, told the Toms River Citizens Action Committee on Childhood Cancer Cluster Monday.

Three of the diagnosed children also live in the section of the township that used to be known as the village of Toms River before then-Dover Township changed its name in 2006, he said.

“Chance is not the likely explanation, but it could be for that difference,” Fagliano said of the cause of the high number of soft tissue sarcomas.

Fagliano presented a summary of the study findings to the committee. A full report on the findings should be released next month, he said.

Overall, the analysis found 26 cases of childhood cancer diagnosed in Toms River residents up to the age of 19 during the five-year period between 2001 and 2005. The rate to be expected is 22.8 cases, meaning there were 1.1 times more cases in Toms River than expected, which is not statistically significant, according to Fagliano.

The study is just the latest to be launched since residents began observing a high number of children diagnosed with cancer in Toms River in the mid-1980s.

A previous study of the elevated childhood cancer levels in Toms River began in 1996 and was completed in 2001.

That study found that exposure to contaminated drinking water from United Water Toms River’s Parkway well field and to polluted air from the former Ciba-Geigy Superfund site was associated with leukemia development in young girls, but no links between environmental pollutants and leukemia development in boys or nervous system cancers in male or female children were found.

Researchers have stressed repeatedly, however, that the limited number of cases included in that study makes it impossible to draw any conclusions about causes. Both United Water Toms River’s Parkway well field and Ciba-Geigy plant were closed in the mid-1990s.

The most recent study found that the number of cases of childhood leukemia was less than what would be expected, while the number of brain and central nervous system cancers was slightly higher than expected, but not statistically significant.

Linda Gillick, chairwoman of the committee, said the data on leukemia are “great,” but the data of the elevated soft tissue sarcomas are troubling.

“We need to go and talk to the families and see if they have anything in common,” she said.

Fagliano recommended that the state continue to monitor the number of children diagnosed with cancer in Toms River. He said that so far, the state is not aware of any cases of soft tissue sarcoma diagnosed in 2006, 2007 or 2008, but he stressed that the data are preliminary.

“We are going to continue to watch,” he told the committee.

Gillick and others, though, pushed for the state to ask questions of the families of diagnosed children to find similarities in their cases.

“These parents want answers,” Gillick said.

Fagliano said that the state could gather information, but “the question is whether it will be meaningful in any way.”

Gillick noted that representatives of the state Department of Environmental Protection and federal Environmental Protection Agency and area legislators were invited to the meeting but failed to attend.

The state is in the process of starting a study into incidences of childhood cancer throughout Monmouth and Ocean counties, according to Fagliano.

Filed in New Jersey | No responses yet