Archive for the 'Maryland' Category

Poolesville to install systems to remove radon, uranium from well water

Terry on Aug 9th 2011

Concern about possible cancer clusters prompted project

by Susan Singer-Bart, Staff Writer
The Gazette

Poolesville, Md.-Poolesville is planning to install a radon and uranium removal system on three of its 11 wells.

It is the first community water system in the state to make the installation, said Jay Apperson, spokesman for the Maryland Department of the Environment.

Wells 7 and 10 were taken out of service as a precaution in 2007 after uranium levels were found to be in danger of exceeding the maximum allowable contaminant level.

Since that time, well 7 has exceeded the level, but well 10 has not.

The Environmental Protection Agency sets the maximum allowable contaminant level for uranium at 30 micrograms per liter. It has not established a maximum level for radon.

Poolesville’s 2010-2011 water report found the level for well 7 to be 33.5 micrograms per liter. The level at wells 9 and 10 is 12.05 micrograms per liter, but the radon and uranium removal system is being used to avoid cross-contamination on those sites.

Water seeping from a contaminated well could affect water in another.

“It’s our responsibility to supply the best water we can,” said Paul “Eddie” Kuhlman II, president of the Poolesville Town Commission.

The project started out of concern there might be a cluster of cancer cases in Poolesville, a town of 5,300. A study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention concluded in 2009 that was not the case, but the concern was the catalyst for the project, Kuhlman said.

Concentration of radon in drinking water minimally increases the lifetime risk of cancer, said Olga Naidenko, a scientist with the Environmental Working Group, a nonprofit group based in Washington, D.C., with a mission to protect public health and the environment.

“The only safe level is zero,” she said.

“Under no circumstances should water from well 7 be consumed by people,” she added.

Some level of radon and uranium is present in the environment, she said.

Poolesville’s water supply comes from groundwater pumped at 11 wells around the town.

Often when a utility has several wells and one has chemical contamination levels above EPA standards, the water from several wells is blended to dilute it and meet the standards, she said.

She said she is happy to hear Poolesville has not done that.

Poolesville plans to install an ion-selection filtration system, Apperson said. The department is charged with implementing the federal Safe Water Drinking Act in the state.

The town has been planning the project for almost five years, said Town Manager Wade Yost, and has set aside $750,000 for it. The town applied to the Department of the Environment for a construction permit in 2009 and received it in June, Yost said.

The removal system will be housed in a building alongside the well house on Budd Road.

Poolesville is accepting bids for the project and hopes work will begin in October. Work should be completed next spring, Yost said.

ssingerbart@gazette.net

Radon linked to lung cancer, other development issues

The following information is provided by the EPA:

-Radon is a colorless, odorless, tasteless and radioactive gas.

-It is formed by the normal radioactive decay of uranium and radium. Underground rock containing natural uranium continuously releases radon gas into groundwater.

-Exposure to radon in the home is more commonly due to radon from rock or soil seeping into homes through foundation cracks than through water. Radon can reach harmful levels if trapped indoors.

-A 1998 report by the National Academy of Sciences confirmed that radon in drinking water is related to cancer deaths, primarily lung cancer.

-Most of the risk from radon in drinking water comes from the transfer of radon into the air and inhaling it or ingesting water containing radon.

-In addition to being present in drinking water, radon in well water becomes airborne through washing dishes and laundry, showering and flushing toilets.

-Drinking water contains dissolved radon and the radiation emitted by radon and its radiation decay products exposes sensitive cells in the stomach and other organs.

-About 21,000 lung cancer deaths in the U.S. each year are radon-related. Exposure to radon is the second leading cause of lung cancer after smoking. The number of lung cancer deaths is 160,000 per year. A National Academy of Sciences report found 184 deaths per year attributable to radon in drinking water.

-Drinking water accounts for 20 of the 13,000 deaths per year from stomach cancer.

-The EPA set a maximum contaminant level for uranium at 30 micrograms per liter of water. No data show a threshold below which exposure to radon is harmless.

According to the Environmental Working Group, a nonprofit environmental watchdog based in Washington, D.C., human exposure to radon has been linked to severe respiratory disease, harmful kidney effects, sexual maturation effects, mutations and increases in lung cancer deaths.

Filed in Maryland | No responses yet

Activists try to link cancer, arsenic in soil near Fort Detrick

Terry on May 11th 2011

By Megan Eckstein
News-Post Staff

Frederick, Md.–High levels of arsenic in soil near Fort Detrick’s Area B have local activists concerned, saying the Army post’s past use and testing of arsenic may be contributing to cancer cases in Frederick.

The Kristen Renee Foundation has been regularly taking soil samples around Area B and testing them for contaminants, publicist Rachel Kelley-Pisani said. In April, the foundation tested two new locations, one along Rocky Springs Road, the other from a cistern near Kemp Lane. The lab report showed high arsenic levels, something that had not come up in any of the other samples.

As much as 94.6 milligrams of arsenic per kilogram of soil was found near Kemp Lane, and 4.3 milligrams per kilogram was found near Rocky Springs Road, Kelley-Pisani said.

This geographic area is known for high levels of arsenic in the soil, and Frederick has an even higher level than other parts of the state, according to data from the Maryland Department of the Environment.

Whereas eastern Maryland has about 2.3 milligrams of arsenic per kilogram of soil and central Maryland has 3.3 milligrams per kilogram, Frederick has 4.9 milligrams of arsenic per kilogram of soil, MDE spokeswoman Dawn Stoltzfus said in an email.

In the 19th and 20th centuries, arsenic was used in Frederick as an agricultural pesticide in orchards and crop fields, and as an industrial herbicide along railroads, she said. It is now known that chronic exposure to arsenic can increase a person’s risk of developing skin, lung and bladder cancers.

Kelley-Pisani acknowledged the naturally occurring arsenic in the ground but said she had reason to believe Fort Detrick could have exacerbated the problem.

“There are levels of arsenic that are naturally occurring, but you wouldn’t see an exceedance like that, you wouldn’t see it to that extent,” she said Tuesday afternoon.

Kelley-Pisani said the Kristen Renee Foundation would not yet release information it has on past research at Fort Detrick and how it relates to arsenic, but she said the foundation is in contact with several former Fort Detrick researchers who have agreed to turn over lab notes outlining what carcinogens they worked with at Fort Detrick.

Dozens of people who live or lived near Fort Detrick who have developed cancer are submitting liability claims to Fort Detrick for as much as $5 million each.

The only liability claim Fort Detrick has ever paid out was in 1951, when 11 cows died near Fort Detrick’s fence line from arsenic poisoning. Kelley-Pisani said the foundation was aware of this incident, which was part of what inspired the group to investigate whether arsenic could be behind what the foundation believes is a cancer cluster, though health officials have not found evidence that one exists.

In 1951, a contractor sprayed a weed killer along the Fort Detrick fence line that contained sodium arsenite, according to The Frederick News-Post’s archives. The cows ate grass covered in arsenic and died over a three-day period.

Fort Detrick spokesman Chuck Gordon said current Fort Detrick leaders were familiar with the 1951 incident, but he said Fort Detrick regularly tests its groundwater and soil and there is no evidence of arsenic contamination on post.

When 26 wells and a spring were tested in September for metals, including arsenic, only one well tested positive for arsenic. That well had about 5 parts per billion. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency allows 10 parts per billion, he said. Gordon added that MDE has reported groundwater in Frederick County may naturally contain anywhere from 1 to 26 parts per billion.

Rederick News Post

Filed in Maryland | No responses yet

Cancer Death Raises New Concern Over Fort Detrick

Terry on Nov 18th 2010

Randy White, upper left, with his daughters Kristen, center, and Angie, son Brandon and ex-wife Debra Cross.

Family calls on Congress for help

Thursday, 18 Nov 2010

Roby Chavez
roby.chavez@foxtv.com
By ROBY CHAVEZ/myfoxdc

FREDERICK, Md. – The recent death of another person in the family closely connected to the ongoing cancer cluster investigation near Fort Detrick has turned personal loss into rage.

Debra Cross, the ex-wife of local activist Randy White, died Friday night after battling stage four renal cell carcinoma for months.

Many people in Frederick blame a soaring number of cancer cases on the Army post’s track record of testing dangerous chemicals.

Last month, the Maryland Department of Health declared there was no cancer cluster.

The latest victim’s family is at the center of that fight for Frederick families. On Wednesday, they are sending an emotional message to Congress.

“I collapsed on the floor because it was a replay of what I had just been through two years ago with my daughter in this exact funeral home,” said Randy White, as he grieved at a Frederick Funeral Home.

White’s daughter, Kristen Renee, died of brain cancer two years ago. Now his ex-wife has died too.

“The people in Frederick need to be aware that there is a serial killer in the back yard,” he said.

White has spent $220,000 on his own independent research and testing to investigate contamination. He says it found high levels of chemicals in the ground and water.

With another death in his family, he’s making an urgent plea.

“I’m calling on Senator Barbara Mikulski and Senator [Ben] Cardin to get behind this. They need to get behind this because the people of Frederick need to be aware of what’s happening in their own backyard,” said White.

That backyard, Fort Detrick, used to be the place where White’s children used to play.

Fort Detrick officials have already admitted to testing Agent Orange and nerve gas in the past.

For the two surviving White children, the death of their mother brings sadness and fear about their own young lives. Angie has already had benign stomach cancer.

“Me and my brother live in fear if we’re going to be next. I wish I could say she died a peaceful death. It was horrific,” said Angie Pieper, Cross’ daughter.

“She couldn’t walk. We had to carry her and take care of her physically. She deteriorated. She couldn’t eat. Slowly we watched. The hardest thing I had to face besides my sister’s death,” said Brandon White, as he described his mother’s last days.

White painfully recalled his ex-wife’s dying words just days ago.

“She told me don’t quit. She looked at me and said you fight. Don’t let any other families go through the pain we’ve been through. It’s why I’m doing it,” said White as he wiped away tears.

White says by his count, his wife is the fourth person in 21 days with ties to Fort Detrick to die of cancer in Frederick.

Fort Detrick maintains it is still collecting information and reviewing government records. It is also working with the health department on its ongoing study.

read online

Kristen Renee Foundation

Filed in Maryland,~Impacted Communities | No responses yet

Md., federal agencies probe for Agent Orange information

Terry on Aug 24th 2010

Frederick News-Post

Frederick, MD–State and federal agencies requested the Army test for Agent Orange near Fort Detrick, a Maryland Department of Environment spokeswoman said Thursday.The Maryland Department of Environment and the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene released a statement Thursday outlining efforts to address environmental contamination at and around Fort Detrick, as well as allegations the contaminants resulted in a cancer cluster.

The statement said the two agencies requested Fort Detrick test for Agent Orange, in addition to the Army post’s continued obligation to test for chemicals, including PCE and TCE, that in 1992 were found to have leaked from Area B.

“MDE and EPA made that request to the Army in conversations in late July — and the Army agreed to do the sampling,” wrote MDE spokeswoman Dawn Stoltzfus in an e-mail Thursday.

“Right now, the Army is doing record review on their historical use of Agent Orange. Then the Army will submit a sampling plan based on their records and propose areas to be tested and what they will be tested for. We know that this will include Area B and adjacent properties.”

MDE and EPA would need to approve the sampling plan, she said.

MDE and DHMH also are “in ongoing communication” with the Kristen Renee Foundation, which claims Fort Detrick is responsible for a cancer cluster in the neighborhoods surrounding the Army post, according to the statement released by MDE secretary Shari Wilson and DHMH secretary Frances Phillips.

“We understand the serious questions and concerns that remain, particularly when a loved one’s health is at stake,” the statement said, adding the groups had scheduled public meetings for the first Thursday of every month, to be held at 6:30 p.m. at Winchester Hall. The first of those meetings was held Aug. 12 and ran longer than the two-hour schedule.

DHMH is working with the Frederick County Health Department to review data from the Maryland Cancer Registry to determine the numbers and types of cancers in three census tracts around Fort Detrick, which is more or less a one-mile radius around the post.

Officials must determine whether the data in the registry and provided by the Kristen Renee Foundation constitutes a cancer rate that is statistically significantly higher than the cancer rates for the county or state. This process could take until the end of September, Clifford Mitchell, chief of DHMH’s Center for Environmental Health Coordination, said at the Aug. 12 meeting.

Frederick County health officer Barbara Brookmyer said at that meeting not all types of cancers would be looked at. The departments would focus on the most common types of cancer — lung, colorectal, breast and prostate —-as well as the types associated with the contaminants found at Fort Detrick — kidney, liver, brain and blood cancers.

Additionally, the investigation can look at cases from 2000 to 2007 only. Data can take up to two years to be verified before being added to the registry, so 2007 is the last complete year available. The census tract system used was created in 2000, and that system is the only good way of calculating the population near Fort Detrick.

“I do admit it’s not a perfect solution, but it’s the best chance we have at this point of developing some rapid, quick data, some quick information to bring back. it’s not going to be the final answer, that I promise,” Mitchell said at the meeting.

Gov. Martin O’Malley, during a visit to Frederick this week, said the state was involved in investigating the cancer cluster, but he said he wasn’t sure what the state could do to push forward an investigation into the Army’s use of Agent Orange. He said “there probably would be a way” but that he needed to look into the matter.

read online

Fighting for Frederick: Our City, Our Health community group.

Filed in Maryland | No responses yet

Cancer-cluster theory on paper, rage in father’s heart

Terry on Aug 6th 2010

By Petula Dvorak
Friday, August 6, 2010; B01

It began with a neighbor dying, then an uncle who lived down the street, then all the livestock on one Maryland farm fell dead, one cow after another.

And then it hit closer to home — a wife fell terminally ill and a young daughter was gone.

The pattern became familiar, the stories swapped between neighbors sounding more and more alike: cancer, tumors, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, leukemia.

The Rice family has lost 12 members to leukemia alone.

“That’s not counting brain, breast, all of those other cancers,” said Diane Rice, 55, who survived breast cancer. “You just know that’s not right. Something is not right.”

Over their fences, at community picnics but mostly at funerals, the people of one Frederick neighborhood near Fort Detrick wondered whether it was just a horrible coincidence that so many of them had cancer.

It’s become a familiar scenario. Cinematic, even, thanks to the amazing story of Erin Brockovich, who helped prove that a utility company had been poisoning the water supply of Hinkley, Calif., for more than 30 years. A small town’s residents soaked in grief and armed to the teeth with lab reports, statistics and analyses step forward to prove that they are, in fact, a cancer cluster and not just an unfortunate collection of tragedies.

And, of course, following close behind them are the cluster-busters.

“There have only been a few reported cancer clusters that have proven to be real clusters,” Melissa Bondy, a professor of epidemiology at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, wrote in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute. “People get alarmed when they hear about cancers at various sites in an area. There have been some that epidemiologists have been able to untangle, but most cancer clusters have not been well documented. They usually don’t pan out to be anything.”

Try telling that to Randy White, whose 30-year-old daughter died of brain tumors in 2008. Now his ex-wife has stage four renal cancer, and another daughter has stomach tumors.

White grew up in Frederick and raised his family there. But when the Whites moved to Florida and began getting sick, a doctor looked collectively at their illnesses and told them that they weren’t genetic, they were environmental.

They immediately looked to their former next-door neighbor, Fort Detrick, where anthrax and Agent Orange were studied for decades and where about 400 acres known as Area B were used for storage and dumping. The EPA put it on its Superfund cleanup list last year, and the Army has been spending millions of dollars in the past decade to clean up its harrowing waste pits.

Because carcinogens have contaminated wells, “A lot of people still get bottled water delivered to them by the Army,” Rice said.

White’s family used the city’s water system, so it shouldn’t have consumed contaminated tap water. But scientists determined that vapors rising through the ground from the discarded chemicals had seeped into the Whites’ home.

“Vapor intrusion, dioxins, Agent Orange,” White said.

Enraged, he formed the Kristen Renee Foundation, named for his late daughter. In the past two years, he has plowed about $200,000 of his own money into the effort to link the chemicals dumped at Fort Detrick to decades of deaths in the community.

He hired researchers, doctors and chemists to prove his hunch that his home town is host to one of America’s largest cancer clusters. Over the years, cancer has been found in 400 people within two miles of White’s former home in Frederick, he learned.

Some of them have shown up at community forums, sharing their stories, comparing notes, demanding that the U.S. Army help pay their medical bills and clean up their land.

Now Barbara Brookmyer, Frederick County’s health officer, is investigating whether there is a cancer cluster near Fort Detrick. A community forum will be held Thursday to hear residents’ stories.

Chuck Gordon, a spokesman for Fort Detrick, said the base is cooperating with her efforts.

“It’s not Fort Detrick’s place to delve into public-health issues,” he said. “We fully support the Frederick County Health Department as lead agency for public health and are urging anyone who approaches us with any such info to follow the proper chain and work with Dr. Brookmyer.”

White, however, thinks the Army, rather than a county doctor, should step in.

A charismatic megachurch pastor with spiky blond hair and funky eyeglasses that proclaim him hipper than most men of the cloth, White holds up reams of reports when he talks about the research he’s done. He stands beside a huge picture of his smiling, champagne-blond daughter, Kristen.

“This is an environmental disaster much larger than the gulf spill,” said White, who is considering a class-action lawsuit against the Army.

But even if he’s able to prove that the cancer cluster exists, and even if he succeeds in holding the Army accountable, it can’t change the terrible health consequences for hundreds of devastated families. Including his own.

E-mail me at dvorakp@washpost.com.

read online

Filed in Maryland | No responses yet

Special Report: Delaware Drinking Water at Risk

Terry on Jul 25th 2010

What you haven’t been told about chemicals polluting the aquifer that serves Del., Md., N.J.

By JEFF MONTGOMERY
The News Journal

online videos, interactive graphics

Tainted groundwater is spreading across thousands of acres in northern Delaware and has reached the Potomac Aquifer, which supplies drinking water to people across much of Delaware, Maryland and New Jersey.

In some areas of the upper Potomac near Delaware City and New Castle, concentrations of benzene, vinyl chloride and chlorinated benzenes are so high that exposure poses an immediate health threat. Elevated levels of these industrial byproducts significantly increase the risks of cancer. Sustained exposure could kill.

Northern Delaware is home to some of the worst chemical dumping grounds in America, a legacy of broken promises and corporate misdeeds. Regulators working for Delaware and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency have long claimed that the deep clay layers above the aquifer protected it from the foul waters discharged by chemical and petroleum manufacturers.

Those assurances have proved false.

The protective layer over the aquifer, scientists now say, is full of holes.

To prevent a public health disaster, the state has banned public use of groundwater under or near the Delaware City petrochemical complex.

Toxic pollutants, though, are now moving near the edge of that containment zone, outside the properties of Metachem, Occidental Chemical, Formosa Plastics and the Delaware City Refinery, and toward schools and houses.

One plume of chemicals has traveled a mile south of the refinery’s main production area and has seeped 190 feet into the earth.

While millions have been spent to test and track the spread of potentially lethal chemicals, little has been done to keep residents informed about the threats to their drinking water. Some of the worst polluters have walked away, leaving cleanups to taxpayers.

Public health officials have barely begun to gather the epidemiological data and household research that could connect environmental toxins to the higher frequencies of lung, prostate and colorectal cancers found from Wilmington to Dover and around Millsboro.

The News Journal spent a year investigating groundwater contamination and toxins moving through the soil. The investigation uncovered a damning history of corporate mistakes and lax government oversight, especially in the corridor bordered by the Delaware River, Du Pont Highway and the Chesapeake & Delaware Canal.

The newspaper obtained thousands of pages of corporate documents, consultant reports, hydrology and geology studies, well-water monitoring reports and ecological tests on fish and plants. The majority of the documents were gathered through state and federal Freedom of Information Act requests. Most have never been distributed to the public.

Among The News Journal’s findings:

Delaware City Refinery (cleanup led by former owner Motiva Enterprises). After nearly two decades of investigation, a Motiva consultant acknowledged to state regulators in 2008 that cleanup engineers don’t know the direction or extent of pollution moving under the refinery, according to a document never publicly released. Engineers sought approval to inject nitric acid deep into the ground to neutralize a plume of sodium hydroxide. The company retracted the request after a Delaware City resident, unaware of the project’s true purpose, requested a public hearing.

Delaware Sand & Gravel (private landfill near Army Creek owned by a trust). The EPA in April threatened to take over groundwater cleanup work after discovering that bis 2-chloroethyl ether (BCEE), an industrial solvent also used to make pesticides, continues to spread out of control near a major public utility well that supplies water to tens of thousands in northern Delaware. BCEE is a probable carcinogen. The EPA demanded a new plan to deal with the threat in a private letter to DS&G, obtained by The News Journal, that has never been publicized.

Metachem Products (formerly Standard Chlorine). Despite repeated assurances that deep groundwater was safe from herbicide and pesticide ingredients spilled at the abandoned Metachem plant, EPA consultants this year confirmed finding extremely high levels of toxic contamination deep underground, some at nearly twice the depth seen five years ago. The result was drastically different than the picture painted in mid-2005, when government officials noted “no detections” in a mid-year sample from a shallower well.

Delaware City PVC Plant (includes cleanup work for Formosa Plastics, Stauffer Chemical and Akzo Chemical). Levels of ethylene dichloride used in the production of vinyl chloride have increased “significantly” in some wells near Du Pont Highway, according to a March letter obtained by The News Journal. State regulators did not publicize the developments, although they did send private letters just over a year ago to neighbors urging them to consider hooking up to a public utility to reduce the risk of exposure to the probable carcinogen.

Occidental Chemical. A consultant’s report filed with the EPA by Occidental Chemical speculated that mercury levels in sediments near the company’s shuttered chlorine factory could be high enough to pose a risk to insect-eating birds that feed in nearby marshland.

Nobody — not corporate consultants, not government regulators, not scientists — can say how badly the upper Potomac Aquifer is polluted or how long it will take these plumes of toxic chemicals to reach new drinking water sources. After decades of spills, explosions and dumping — and billions in corporate profits — most of the manufacturers along the Delaware River’s western border near Delaware City have closed or declared bankruptcy. The cleanup bill now belongs to a few corporate entities and to the public, which remains largely uninformed.

‘No fix’

Near Patti Bennett’s home, in a marshy hollow not far from Southern Elementary School, gasoline has pierced the Potomac and bled into Dragon Run creek, which meanders over several miles from Lums Pond to the Delaware River.

Monitoring tests conducted in 2006 found benzene and a since-banned gasoline additive at a level 160 times greater than the federal standard for safe drinking water.

The state Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control never reported those findings, and the public still would not be aware of the danger if The News Journal hadn’t come across the report through a series of FOIA requests.

“I kind of know what’s out there,” said Bennett, whose relatives have owned land along Cox Neck Road, south of the refinery, since the early 1950s. “But nobody has ever come up and knocked at my door and said: ‘Look, we have a problem and you might want to check your water.’ ”

Many of the documents are held by DNREC or the EPA under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, a law that allows government oversight of cleanups by active and ongoing businesses. Those cleanups, while publicly supervised, provide few avenues for public participation or briefings.

The federal Superfund cleanup law, while more attentive to public interests, creates projects that take decades to complete, with years passing between public notifications.

Delaware’s top environmental officer acknowledged that the state hasn’t communicated the scope of the problems well enough for the public to understand.

“I think that the focus of the department going forward has to be on the resource, not just on the property boundary,” said Collin P. O’Mara, state secretary of Natural Resources and Environmental Control. “We’re trying to shift that mind-set. A lot of the focus in the past has been on legal issues. Maybe we haven’t done quite enough looking at the migration of some of these plumes, to try to move beyond the legal boundaries.”

His agency is trying to develop more aggressive and protective approaches to water pollution investigations, efforts partly driven by concerns about state cancer death rates and recently identified contamination risks from other types of pollutants.

State regulators have made big strides recently in curbing industrial and power plant air pollution, some linked to cancer, O’Mara said. But work is only starting on other potential contributors to unexplained clusters of high cancer rates in parts of Delaware.

“We’ve not studied nearly as much the link between water pollution and various health outcomes,” O’Mara said. “Water is probably the greatest environmental challenge facing the state right now.”

Longtime resident Alice Wilmoth said she knew little about the underground poison nearing her home until anglers began steering clear of fishing in Dragon Run and the large tidal marsh that borders it.

Wilmoth, 83, has run the family-owned Delaware Bait Center alongside Dragon Run at U.S. 13 since the late 1940s, before the refinery was constructed over a landscape of farms and swamps.

“It’s still really pretty. I used to fish a lot in there and I’d catch bluegill and pike — the fish with teeth,” Wilmoth said. “Now a lot of people are afraid to catch anything.”

More glaring problems have been found in Red Lion Creek, a waterway just north of Dragon Run and north of the refinery and Metachem Products Superfund site. In 2007, a consultant for the EPA concluded that both adults and children would elevate their lifetime health risks if they ate fish caught from the creek.

Researchers concluded that pollution from several dangerous chemical spills had reached the groundwater around Metachem and posed a cancer risk to workers at the site and potential trespassers.

Delaware Geological Survey scientist Tom McKenna said the only thing to do about pollution in the area now is to cut off the source, clean up as much as possible and wait to see how far it spreads.

“You’re not going to stop the tremendous volume of water from moving. You can’t possibly pump it all out. You just have to be able to predict where the water is going, so folks can be made aware,” McKenna said. “There is no fix.”

Scientific disagreement

Delaware City’s municipal drinking water is drawn from the Potomac hundreds of feet deeper than the private wells and a mile south of contamination from the refinery. Most homes and developments nearby today are served by public utilities that tap even more distant streams or wells.

The EPA contends pollution from the refinery, Metachem and the other nearby cleanup sites will take decades — or longer — to foul major public supplies.

Other experts say that scientists still don’t understand the geology of the area well enough to be confident in predicting how fast plumes of underground chemicals will move. They warn that the pollution may already have caused irreparable harm.

Llangollen Estates resident Barbara J. Bason firmly believes that tainted water harmed her family in 1977, a time when the nation was waking up to the dangers of toxic spills and tainted groundwater.

The problem hit home when Bason’s infant son, Chris, grew violently ill every time he took formula made with tap water from her house just south of New Castle, long served by public wells near some of the most-notorious toxic landfills.

“Whenever I used canned formula, there wasn’t a problem,” Bason recalled. “When I had to use tap water, he had projectile vomiting.”

Bason began hauling in water from public springs miles away, and eventually installed a heavy-duty home filter.

Not long afterward, news emerged about the thousands of leaking drums and chemical wastes seeping out of the nearby Delaware Sand & Gravel industrial waste dump and into water supplies.

“People were terribly upset,” Bason said. “They were finding serious stuff in the water that was apparently leaking out of what was dumped there.”

After years of cleanup work, the Environmental Protection Agency declared DS&G under control, in the mid-1990s, going so far as to include the project among its Superfund “Success Stories.”

By 2000, a toxic plume from the same landfill fouled Artesian wells serving Llangollen Estates and thousands of other homes near New Castle. State and federal officials ordered new remedies, only to admit earlier this year that groundwater threats remain out of control.

The spread of pollution can be impossible to predict in multilayered aquifers like the Potomac, said Rutgers University geologist Ken Miller.

“The Coastal Plain is notorious, because it has sands that are relatively unconsolidated that can transmit things a long distance,” Miller said. Believing pollution to be safely confined can be a serious mistake.

“That’s deadly,” Miller said.

On May 10, 2008, DNREC banned any new public or private wells for drinking water over roughly eight square miles around the refinery. Although state environmental officials admit that pollution at the petrochemical complex north of Delaware City is vast, they insist it isn’t hurting anyone.

“Right now, nobody is using groundwater from the area around the refinery or Metachem, and we believe the contamination is contained for the most part,” said Marjorie Crofts, DNREC’s acting Air and Waste Management Director. “All of the public wells in the area are much deeper, and it would take a very long time for any pollution from the refinery area to reach those supplies.”

Federal and state regulators, though, frequently have overstated their ability to contain and control plumes of toxic chemicals. The government’s response has been too slow and too weak, said Jane Nogaki, a member of the New Jersey Environmental Federation and Clean Water Action.

“A permit to operate isn’t a permit for an industry to pollute,” Nogaki said. “With our population continuing to grow, there’s no assurance that we won’t be needing all our sources of drinking water, and all groundwater should be treated as a potential source of drinking water.”

Complex network

Around northern Delaware, the most important water-bearing aquifers are underground seams of sand, clay, silt and pebbles that settled out of tidal and river waters millions of years ago. As coastlines changed and oceans receded, the most-recent layers became dry land.

Below ground, some older layers opened channels for water sinking from the surface. The makeup and type of material — sandy or rocky or clay-like — determined how fast and in what direction water flowed.

Michael Boynton, a scientist now researching the Potomac near Delaware City for the EPA, said that aquifers in northern Delaware sometimes are more like a chaotic marble cake than a neat layer cake, complicating water movement and mapping efforts.

“It’s very complex. The environment in the past that laid down the sediments in the first place were very high-energy. River materials can move around very rapidly and conditions can change as they’re laid down. Trying to figure out where channels may be isn’t easy.”

At Delaware City, Boynton said, “the interpretation has changed over the years, and we’ve all learned that it’s more complex. We’ve had to refine how we look at the water and the movement of the water and any contaminants that are associated with the water. It does take time.”

In mid-2005, state and federal officials wrote in a progress report on the cleanup at Metachem that testing to date had found “no signs of site related contaminants” in a well 70 feet below the surface.

At the time, officials said they foresaw little, if any, risk that highly toxic chlorinated benzenes would soak into the Potomac from the soils above, where pesticide and herbicide ingredients had fouled dozens of acres, including wetlands adjacent to Red Lion Creek. Some of those toxic chemicals were found in a very shallow Potomac well before and after the 2005 report, officials admitted. But nothing pointed to deep aquifer contamination.

Until last fall.

The News Journal learned earlier this year that in September tests of water from a well twice as deep as those sampled in 2005 found four pollutants at levels up to 800 times higher than any previously reported. Concentrations of one toxic compound, benzene, were 5,200 times higher than levels considered safe by the federal government.

Neither the EPA nor DNREC released the full report to the public at large, although the findings were posted six months ago by DNREC to a hard-to-find state Web page. No public hearing has been held to examine the new dangers.

At the Delaware City Refinery, contractors working for Motiva admitted to state regulators in 2008 that they still do not know enough about the geology of the area to estimate how badly the Potomac already has been polluted in southern areas of the plant. DNREC has never publicly released this report, but The News Journal obtained a copy during its investigation.

The problem is so great that refinery consultants said they have been unable to identify all sources of the benzene, toluene, naptha, perchlorethelene solvents, sodium hydroxide and other hydrocarbons percolating under the plant.

They also cannot say how far the pollution has spread through an underground “paleochannel” that connects shallow and deeper Potomac water layers.

“Based on current data, the horizontal direction of groundwater flow and lateral connectivity of sand unit(s) within the Potomac Formation cannot be fully defined,” the consultants wrote in 2008. “The extent of the [dissolved pollution] … is currently unknown.”

Unsettling news

Some federal summaries of the cleanups near the refinery have asserted that the public has shown little interest in groundwater contamination there. Motiva provided DNREC and the EPA with a public participation plan in 2005, but since then has provided only a few limited updates to members of the plant’s Citizens Advisory Committee.

At the shuttered Occidental Chemical plant, where toxic mercury pollutants are a major concern, the public’s interest has been shrugged off.

“To date, there has been little interest expressed in this site by the local community,” a summary on the EPA’s website noted.

But more than a dozen residents who live nearby told The News Journal they had no idea plumes of chemicals were headed their way.

“It’s very hard for the public to grasp what’s going on down there,” said Seth Ross, a Delaware Nature Society member who has followed the issue for years. “If they don’t have enough information, it’s hard to have an interest.”

Delaware City resident Pamela Martin said she was unaware of problems in Dragon Run, which runs alongside the tiny, scenic home and horse stable that her family owns, about a mile southeast of the refinery.

Martin’s property includes a patch of wetland threatened by plumes of gasoline and benzene.

“I bought this property a few years ago, and nobody told me anything about that,” said Martin. “If there’s stuff like that in the water that’s going to be a detriment to the wetlands, it’s something that we need to know about now.”

Mark Summerfield, who has lived south of the refinery for nine years, also was unaware of the spreading pollution until a reporter questioned him. He said he found the news unsettling.

“We’d like to be made aware,” Summerfield said. “It might get more people out to public meetings when these issues come up.”

Kenneth T. Kristl, who directs the environmental law clinic at Widener University, said the public needs to know more about the problems around Delaware City.

“The fact of the matter is, if you have warning signs, the public may have a different view of the urgency of the situation,” Kristl said. “An industrial site is used for industry, but I don’t think that any fair reading of state or federal environmental laws says that, just because I have an industrial site, I get to pollute.”

Additional Facts
read online and see Interactive graphic

Filed in Delaware,Maryland,New Jersey | No responses yet