Archive for July, 2010

Environmental activist urges others to become involved

Terry on Jul 31st 2010

She describes nightmare of Love Canal

Lois Gibbs speaks at the Needmor Fund on a tour stop with the Center for Health, Environment and Justice.

( THE BLADE/ANDY MORRISON )
Zoom | Photo Reprints
By TOM HENRY
BLADE STAFF WRITER

Lois Gibbs, former Niagara Falls housewife-turned-activist who was at the center of the Love Canal controversy of the late 1970s that led to an overhaul of national pollution laws, made a stop in downtown Toledo Friday to generate support for area activists.
The stop is part of an Ohio tour for Ms. Gibbs and members of her Center for Health, Environment and Justice group in northern Virginia that she founded after being among the Love Canal evacuees.
“People are willing to get involved. They just don’t know how to do it,” Ms. Gibbs told a group of 20 people at the Needmor Fund on South St. Clair Street.
She recalled the events that led her, at age 27, to give up a comfortable suburban life in an “American-dream community” for a decades-long fight of what she perceives as injustices across the national landscape, many of them pollution-related.
The same woman who admittedly became a government agitator was feted by Lucas County commissioners with a proclamation for “effective grass-roots environmental activism.” It was presented to Ms. Gibbs by Lucas County Administrator Peter Ujvagi, who said he has admired her tenacity.
Love Canal was a planned community in eastern Niagara Falls where dozens of homes and a school were built in the late 1950s after the city had purchased the land from the Hooker Chemical Co. for $1 in 1953.
Myriad health problems, including birth defects and miscarriages, occurred because the homes were built too close to a canal that had been turned into a municipal and chemical dump. It leaked hazardous industrial chemicals, including cancer-causing benzene, resulting in an evacuation of dozens of families. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on its Web site calls it “one of the most appalling environmental tragedies in American history.”

The Love Canal saga also led to congressional passage of the U.S. EPA’s Superfund Act. That law is intended to make polluters pay for their messes even if that means reimbursing the government over many years. Sites designated for cleanup under the Superfund Act are considered many of the nation’s worst toxic dumps.
Ms. Gibbs has visited Ohio on other occasions, including a rally she led in the late 1990s when residents of Marion, Ohio, raised questions about the leukemia cluster at the former River Valley Middle School complex. It eventually was replaced.
She is an aficionado of Toledo politics, occasionally checking in on the career of former Toledo Mayor Carty Finkbeiner. She has been in the area for various functions in recent years, including a three-day visit in 2007 in which she stopped off at Warren AME Church, visited residents of Wauseon, delivered a lecture at Maumee Valley Country Day School, met with some people in Toledo’s central city, and visited residents of Harbor View, the town near Oregon that claims to be Ohio’s smallest village.
The fund-raiser she attended yesterday was for her center and an offshoot of it, called Ohioans for Health, Environment and Justice.
Contact Tom Henry at:
thenry@theblade.com
or 419-724-6079.

read online

Filed in Ohio | No responses yet

Experts question CDC’s downplaying of benzene in childhood leukemia

Terry on Jul 30th 2010

By Bryant Furlow on Jul 30, 2010
epiNewswire

Epidemiologist Peter Infante, who originally identified occupational benzene exposure as a leukemia risk in the 1970s, Thursday questioned a decision by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and editors to remove mention of benzene exposure as a childhood leukemia risk factor from a 2007 CDC review published in the U.S. government’s flagship public health journal, Environmental Health Perspectives.

The review originally listed both benzene and ionizing radiation as significant risk factors for childhood leukemia in its summary, a section of the paper entitled “risk factors,” and the conclusion section. But the authors of the review asked editors to remove benzene within two to three months of the paper’s publication in 2007, spokeswoman Christine Bruske Flowers told epiNewswire Thursday.

Flowers works for National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), which publishes the journal.

“At the time, the data didn’t indicate benzene was a risk factor for childhood leukemia specifically,” Flowers said. “I think there’s a distinction to be made between saying benzene’s a human carcinogen and saying benzene’s linked to childhood leukemia.”

Strangely, while the summary and “risk factors” section no longer list benzene as a childhood leukemia risk, the paper’s conclusion section continues to do so:

In general, benzene and ionizing radiation are two environmental exposures strongly associated with the development of childhood AML or ALL.

The correction and removal of benzene from the review’s summary came as a surprise to NIEHS’s top leukemia researcher, James Huff.

“I do not know what this means,” Huff said. “Of course benzene in our experiments and now others does cause leukemia (and) lymphoma in mice, correspondent with humans.”

Infante also questioned the decision to remove benzene from the review of childhood leukemia risk factors. He was quick to say the CDC authors were free to change their opinion and ask for their paper to be changed.

But the rationale offered by Flowers — that there is or was insufficient evidence tying benzene to childhood leukemia — “doesn’t make sense scientifically,” Infante told epiNewswire.

There are large studies tying fetal and childhood exposure to benzene to childhood leukemia risk, he said. In-utero exposures to paint, which contains benzene, is a risk factor for childhood leukemia, Infante added.

Moreover, Infante questioned the scientific basis for assuming children are not susceptible to benzene’s carcinogenicity.

Benzene is best established as a risk factor for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), Infante said.

“Why would children be any different than adults,” he asked. “Children aren’t a different species. So you have to demonstrate benzene causes AML in children? There are hardly any studies of leukemia in people over 75. Do you have to have evidence it (benzene) specifically causes leukemia in patients in that age group, too?”

Removing mention of benzene from the list of significant risk factors in the EHP review was not a trivial move, Infante said.

“It’s unfortunate in terms of public health that they would not include benzene,” Infante said. “It’s not informing people about the hazards their children may be having.”

Children’s exposures to benzene are frequently preventable, Infante said — if parents know about the risks.

The assumption that benzene is not carcinogenic in children is “lacking in mental rigor,” Infante said.

The EHP correction notification describing the removal of benzene was noticed by Terry Nordbrock, executive director of the National Disease Clusters Alliance (NDCA), who brought it to the attention of epiNewswire’s Bryant Furlow.

Filed in ~Media Feeds | No responses yet

Benzene no longer a ‘significant’ leukemia risk?

Terry on Jul 27th 2010

By Bryant Furlow

The Medical Muckraker

Earlier this month, I got an interesting e-mail from Terry Nordbrock, executive director of the National Disease Clusters Alliance (NDCA).

Terry pointed out a curious “correction” in the monthly government scientific journal Environmental Health Perspectives. (EHP is the flagship journal of the National Institutes for Environmental Health Sciences.)

EHP had added a “correction” to a 2007 CDC review of risk factors for acute childhood leukemias, Terry noticed.

Whereas the authors had originally reported that both benzene and ionizing radiation were risk factors for childhood leukemia, the correction indicated that benzene was not, after all, a leukemia-associated carcinogen:

In the Abstract and in the section “Risk Factors,” the sentences “Only two environmental risk factors (benzene and ionizing radiation) have been significantly linked to ALL or AML” in the original manuscript published online have been changed here to “Only one environmental risk factor (ionizing radiation) has been significantly linked to ALL or AML.”

That’s a hell of a shift in thinking to be buried, unexplained, in a correction note.

I’ve contacted all three authors of the corrected review, as well as leading leukemia epidemiologists, for some insight into what’s going on.

Benzene’s carcinogenicity is one of the best-established epidemiological ‘truths’ in the field.  A consensus that benzene’s not a significant carcinogen after all would be tantamount to epidemiologists deciding cigarettes might not cause cancer after all.

That would be huge news.

But given the petrochemical industry’s concerted efforts over the years to downplay benzene’s carcinogenicity, one also has to consider whether or not there may be more to the story.

Evidence for some of the seemingly most clear-cut cases of benzene’s carcinogenicity are buried away from epidemiologists’ eyes in court settlement documents regarding an occupational cancer cluster in Cincinnati, Ohio and a residential lymphoma cluster near Waller, Texas.

I’m heading up to Santa Fe now to cover state regulation of health insurance rates for The New Mexico Independent.

But I’ll be digging into the curious EHP correction and reporting what I learn at epiNewswire, later this week.

Thanks for the interesting tip, Terry!

Filed in ~Media Feeds | No responses yet

Special Report: Delaware Drinking Water at Risk

Terry on Jul 25th 2010

What you haven’t been told about chemicals polluting the aquifer that serves Del., Md., N.J.

By JEFF MONTGOMERY
The News Journal

online videos, interactive graphics

Tainted groundwater is spreading across thousands of acres in northern Delaware and has reached the Potomac Aquifer, which supplies drinking water to people across much of Delaware, Maryland and New Jersey.

In some areas of the upper Potomac near Delaware City and New Castle, concentrations of benzene, vinyl chloride and chlorinated benzenes are so high that exposure poses an immediate health threat. Elevated levels of these industrial byproducts significantly increase the risks of cancer. Sustained exposure could kill.

Northern Delaware is home to some of the worst chemical dumping grounds in America, a legacy of broken promises and corporate misdeeds. Regulators working for Delaware and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency have long claimed that the deep clay layers above the aquifer protected it from the foul waters discharged by chemical and petroleum manufacturers.

Those assurances have proved false.

The protective layer over the aquifer, scientists now say, is full of holes.

To prevent a public health disaster, the state has banned public use of groundwater under or near the Delaware City petrochemical complex.

Toxic pollutants, though, are now moving near the edge of that containment zone, outside the properties of Metachem, Occidental Chemical, Formosa Plastics and the Delaware City Refinery, and toward schools and houses.

One plume of chemicals has traveled a mile south of the refinery’s main production area and has seeped 190 feet into the earth.

While millions have been spent to test and track the spread of potentially lethal chemicals, little has been done to keep residents informed about the threats to their drinking water. Some of the worst polluters have walked away, leaving cleanups to taxpayers.

Public health officials have barely begun to gather the epidemiological data and household research that could connect environmental toxins to the higher frequencies of lung, prostate and colorectal cancers found from Wilmington to Dover and around Millsboro.

The News Journal spent a year investigating groundwater contamination and toxins moving through the soil. The investigation uncovered a damning history of corporate mistakes and lax government oversight, especially in the corridor bordered by the Delaware River, Du Pont Highway and the Chesapeake & Delaware Canal.

The newspaper obtained thousands of pages of corporate documents, consultant reports, hydrology and geology studies, well-water monitoring reports and ecological tests on fish and plants. The majority of the documents were gathered through state and federal Freedom of Information Act requests. Most have never been distributed to the public.

Among The News Journal’s findings:

Delaware City Refinery (cleanup led by former owner Motiva Enterprises). After nearly two decades of investigation, a Motiva consultant acknowledged to state regulators in 2008 that cleanup engineers don’t know the direction or extent of pollution moving under the refinery, according to a document never publicly released. Engineers sought approval to inject nitric acid deep into the ground to neutralize a plume of sodium hydroxide. The company retracted the request after a Delaware City resident, unaware of the project’s true purpose, requested a public hearing.

Delaware Sand & Gravel (private landfill near Army Creek owned by a trust). The EPA in April threatened to take over groundwater cleanup work after discovering that bis 2-chloroethyl ether (BCEE), an industrial solvent also used to make pesticides, continues to spread out of control near a major public utility well that supplies water to tens of thousands in northern Delaware. BCEE is a probable carcinogen. The EPA demanded a new plan to deal with the threat in a private letter to DS&G, obtained by The News Journal, that has never been publicized.

Metachem Products (formerly Standard Chlorine). Despite repeated assurances that deep groundwater was safe from herbicide and pesticide ingredients spilled at the abandoned Metachem plant, EPA consultants this year confirmed finding extremely high levels of toxic contamination deep underground, some at nearly twice the depth seen five years ago. The result was drastically different than the picture painted in mid-2005, when government officials noted “no detections” in a mid-year sample from a shallower well.

Delaware City PVC Plant (includes cleanup work for Formosa Plastics, Stauffer Chemical and Akzo Chemical). Levels of ethylene dichloride used in the production of vinyl chloride have increased “significantly” in some wells near Du Pont Highway, according to a March letter obtained by The News Journal. State regulators did not publicize the developments, although they did send private letters just over a year ago to neighbors urging them to consider hooking up to a public utility to reduce the risk of exposure to the probable carcinogen.

Occidental Chemical. A consultant’s report filed with the EPA by Occidental Chemical speculated that mercury levels in sediments near the company’s shuttered chlorine factory could be high enough to pose a risk to insect-eating birds that feed in nearby marshland.

Nobody — not corporate consultants, not government regulators, not scientists — can say how badly the upper Potomac Aquifer is polluted or how long it will take these plumes of toxic chemicals to reach new drinking water sources. After decades of spills, explosions and dumping — and billions in corporate profits — most of the manufacturers along the Delaware River’s western border near Delaware City have closed or declared bankruptcy. The cleanup bill now belongs to a few corporate entities and to the public, which remains largely uninformed.

‘No fix’

Near Patti Bennett’s home, in a marshy hollow not far from Southern Elementary School, gasoline has pierced the Potomac and bled into Dragon Run creek, which meanders over several miles from Lums Pond to the Delaware River.

Monitoring tests conducted in 2006 found benzene and a since-banned gasoline additive at a level 160 times greater than the federal standard for safe drinking water.

The state Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control never reported those findings, and the public still would not be aware of the danger if The News Journal hadn’t come across the report through a series of FOIA requests.

“I kind of know what’s out there,” said Bennett, whose relatives have owned land along Cox Neck Road, south of the refinery, since the early 1950s. “But nobody has ever come up and knocked at my door and said: ‘Look, we have a problem and you might want to check your water.’ ”

Many of the documents are held by DNREC or the EPA under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, a law that allows government oversight of cleanups by active and ongoing businesses. Those cleanups, while publicly supervised, provide few avenues for public participation or briefings.

The federal Superfund cleanup law, while more attentive to public interests, creates projects that take decades to complete, with years passing between public notifications.

Delaware’s top environmental officer acknowledged that the state hasn’t communicated the scope of the problems well enough for the public to understand.

“I think that the focus of the department going forward has to be on the resource, not just on the property boundary,” said Collin P. O’Mara, state secretary of Natural Resources and Environmental Control. “We’re trying to shift that mind-set. A lot of the focus in the past has been on legal issues. Maybe we haven’t done quite enough looking at the migration of some of these plumes, to try to move beyond the legal boundaries.”

His agency is trying to develop more aggressive and protective approaches to water pollution investigations, efforts partly driven by concerns about state cancer death rates and recently identified contamination risks from other types of pollutants.

State regulators have made big strides recently in curbing industrial and power plant air pollution, some linked to cancer, O’Mara said. But work is only starting on other potential contributors to unexplained clusters of high cancer rates in parts of Delaware.

“We’ve not studied nearly as much the link between water pollution and various health outcomes,” O’Mara said. “Water is probably the greatest environmental challenge facing the state right now.”

Longtime resident Alice Wilmoth said she knew little about the underground poison nearing her home until anglers began steering clear of fishing in Dragon Run and the large tidal marsh that borders it.

Wilmoth, 83, has run the family-owned Delaware Bait Center alongside Dragon Run at U.S. 13 since the late 1940s, before the refinery was constructed over a landscape of farms and swamps.

“It’s still really pretty. I used to fish a lot in there and I’d catch bluegill and pike — the fish with teeth,” Wilmoth said. “Now a lot of people are afraid to catch anything.”

More glaring problems have been found in Red Lion Creek, a waterway just north of Dragon Run and north of the refinery and Metachem Products Superfund site. In 2007, a consultant for the EPA concluded that both adults and children would elevate their lifetime health risks if they ate fish caught from the creek.

Researchers concluded that pollution from several dangerous chemical spills had reached the groundwater around Metachem and posed a cancer risk to workers at the site and potential trespassers.

Delaware Geological Survey scientist Tom McKenna said the only thing to do about pollution in the area now is to cut off the source, clean up as much as possible and wait to see how far it spreads.

“You’re not going to stop the tremendous volume of water from moving. You can’t possibly pump it all out. You just have to be able to predict where the water is going, so folks can be made aware,” McKenna said. “There is no fix.”

Scientific disagreement

Delaware City’s municipal drinking water is drawn from the Potomac hundreds of feet deeper than the private wells and a mile south of contamination from the refinery. Most homes and developments nearby today are served by public utilities that tap even more distant streams or wells.

The EPA contends pollution from the refinery, Metachem and the other nearby cleanup sites will take decades — or longer — to foul major public supplies.

Other experts say that scientists still don’t understand the geology of the area well enough to be confident in predicting how fast plumes of underground chemicals will move. They warn that the pollution may already have caused irreparable harm.

Llangollen Estates resident Barbara J. Bason firmly believes that tainted water harmed her family in 1977, a time when the nation was waking up to the dangers of toxic spills and tainted groundwater.

The problem hit home when Bason’s infant son, Chris, grew violently ill every time he took formula made with tap water from her house just south of New Castle, long served by public wells near some of the most-notorious toxic landfills.

“Whenever I used canned formula, there wasn’t a problem,” Bason recalled. “When I had to use tap water, he had projectile vomiting.”

Bason began hauling in water from public springs miles away, and eventually installed a heavy-duty home filter.

Not long afterward, news emerged about the thousands of leaking drums and chemical wastes seeping out of the nearby Delaware Sand & Gravel industrial waste dump and into water supplies.

“People were terribly upset,” Bason said. “They were finding serious stuff in the water that was apparently leaking out of what was dumped there.”

After years of cleanup work, the Environmental Protection Agency declared DS&G under control, in the mid-1990s, going so far as to include the project among its Superfund “Success Stories.”

By 2000, a toxic plume from the same landfill fouled Artesian wells serving Llangollen Estates and thousands of other homes near New Castle. State and federal officials ordered new remedies, only to admit earlier this year that groundwater threats remain out of control.

The spread of pollution can be impossible to predict in multilayered aquifers like the Potomac, said Rutgers University geologist Ken Miller.

“The Coastal Plain is notorious, because it has sands that are relatively unconsolidated that can transmit things a long distance,” Miller said. Believing pollution to be safely confined can be a serious mistake.

“That’s deadly,” Miller said.

On May 10, 2008, DNREC banned any new public or private wells for drinking water over roughly eight square miles around the refinery. Although state environmental officials admit that pollution at the petrochemical complex north of Delaware City is vast, they insist it isn’t hurting anyone.

“Right now, nobody is using groundwater from the area around the refinery or Metachem, and we believe the contamination is contained for the most part,” said Marjorie Crofts, DNREC’s acting Air and Waste Management Director. “All of the public wells in the area are much deeper, and it would take a very long time for any pollution from the refinery area to reach those supplies.”

Federal and state regulators, though, frequently have overstated their ability to contain and control plumes of toxic chemicals. The government’s response has been too slow and too weak, said Jane Nogaki, a member of the New Jersey Environmental Federation and Clean Water Action.

“A permit to operate isn’t a permit for an industry to pollute,” Nogaki said. “With our population continuing to grow, there’s no assurance that we won’t be needing all our sources of drinking water, and all groundwater should be treated as a potential source of drinking water.”

Complex network

Around northern Delaware, the most important water-bearing aquifers are underground seams of sand, clay, silt and pebbles that settled out of tidal and river waters millions of years ago. As coastlines changed and oceans receded, the most-recent layers became dry land.

Below ground, some older layers opened channels for water sinking from the surface. The makeup and type of material — sandy or rocky or clay-like — determined how fast and in what direction water flowed.

Michael Boynton, a scientist now researching the Potomac near Delaware City for the EPA, said that aquifers in northern Delaware sometimes are more like a chaotic marble cake than a neat layer cake, complicating water movement and mapping efforts.

“It’s very complex. The environment in the past that laid down the sediments in the first place were very high-energy. River materials can move around very rapidly and conditions can change as they’re laid down. Trying to figure out where channels may be isn’t easy.”

At Delaware City, Boynton said, “the interpretation has changed over the years, and we’ve all learned that it’s more complex. We’ve had to refine how we look at the water and the movement of the water and any contaminants that are associated with the water. It does take time.”

In mid-2005, state and federal officials wrote in a progress report on the cleanup at Metachem that testing to date had found “no signs of site related contaminants” in a well 70 feet below the surface.

At the time, officials said they foresaw little, if any, risk that highly toxic chlorinated benzenes would soak into the Potomac from the soils above, where pesticide and herbicide ingredients had fouled dozens of acres, including wetlands adjacent to Red Lion Creek. Some of those toxic chemicals were found in a very shallow Potomac well before and after the 2005 report, officials admitted. But nothing pointed to deep aquifer contamination.

Until last fall.

The News Journal learned earlier this year that in September tests of water from a well twice as deep as those sampled in 2005 found four pollutants at levels up to 800 times higher than any previously reported. Concentrations of one toxic compound, benzene, were 5,200 times higher than levels considered safe by the federal government.

Neither the EPA nor DNREC released the full report to the public at large, although the findings were posted six months ago by DNREC to a hard-to-find state Web page. No public hearing has been held to examine the new dangers.

At the Delaware City Refinery, contractors working for Motiva admitted to state regulators in 2008 that they still do not know enough about the geology of the area to estimate how badly the Potomac already has been polluted in southern areas of the plant. DNREC has never publicly released this report, but The News Journal obtained a copy during its investigation.

The problem is so great that refinery consultants said they have been unable to identify all sources of the benzene, toluene, naptha, perchlorethelene solvents, sodium hydroxide and other hydrocarbons percolating under the plant.

They also cannot say how far the pollution has spread through an underground “paleochannel” that connects shallow and deeper Potomac water layers.

“Based on current data, the horizontal direction of groundwater flow and lateral connectivity of sand unit(s) within the Potomac Formation cannot be fully defined,” the consultants wrote in 2008. “The extent of the [dissolved pollution] … is currently unknown.”

Unsettling news

Some federal summaries of the cleanups near the refinery have asserted that the public has shown little interest in groundwater contamination there. Motiva provided DNREC and the EPA with a public participation plan in 2005, but since then has provided only a few limited updates to members of the plant’s Citizens Advisory Committee.

At the shuttered Occidental Chemical plant, where toxic mercury pollutants are a major concern, the public’s interest has been shrugged off.

“To date, there has been little interest expressed in this site by the local community,” a summary on the EPA’s website noted.

But more than a dozen residents who live nearby told The News Journal they had no idea plumes of chemicals were headed their way.

“It’s very hard for the public to grasp what’s going on down there,” said Seth Ross, a Delaware Nature Society member who has followed the issue for years. “If they don’t have enough information, it’s hard to have an interest.”

Delaware City resident Pamela Martin said she was unaware of problems in Dragon Run, which runs alongside the tiny, scenic home and horse stable that her family owns, about a mile southeast of the refinery.

Martin’s property includes a patch of wetland threatened by plumes of gasoline and benzene.

“I bought this property a few years ago, and nobody told me anything about that,” said Martin. “If there’s stuff like that in the water that’s going to be a detriment to the wetlands, it’s something that we need to know about now.”

Mark Summerfield, who has lived south of the refinery for nine years, also was unaware of the spreading pollution until a reporter questioned him. He said he found the news unsettling.

“We’d like to be made aware,” Summerfield said. “It might get more people out to public meetings when these issues come up.”

Kenneth T. Kristl, who directs the environmental law clinic at Widener University, said the public needs to know more about the problems around Delaware City.

“The fact of the matter is, if you have warning signs, the public may have a different view of the urgency of the situation,” Kristl said. “An industrial site is used for industry, but I don’t think that any fair reading of state or federal environmental laws says that, just because I have an industrial site, I get to pollute.”

Additional Facts
read online and see Interactive graphic

Filed in Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey | No responses yet

Momentum Builds in Congress to Overhaul U.S. Chemicals Policy

Terry on Jul 23rd 2010

New Bill Introduced Today Seeks to Reduce Toxic Chemical Exposure and Ensure Safety

(Washington, DC) – Congressmen Bobby Rush (D-IL) and Henry Waxman (D-CA) today introduced a groundbreaking bill to overhaul U.S. chemicals policy in the House Energy & Commerce Committee.  The “Toxic Chemicals Safety Act of 2010” is intended to overhaul the 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), which has failed to regulate chemicals in consumer products – even those that have known links to cancer, learning disabilities, asthma, reproductive disorders, and other serious health problems.

“Today’s legislation will reduce chronic disease in this country, a burden that scientists have increasingly linked to toxic chemicals found in our homes and places of work,” said Andy Igrejas, Director of Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families, a coalition of 250 environmental and public health groups.  “It will also give American manufacturers and retailers the tools they need to compete in a world demanding safer products.  We applaud Chairman Rush and Chairman Waxman for leading the way.”

The House legislation would significantly strengthen public health protections from toxic chemicals. For the first time, the chemical industry would be required to demonstrate that chemicals are safe, rather than the EPA having to prove they are unsafe. In a major shift the legislation would require chemical manufacturers to provide basic health and safety information for all chemicals as a condition for them remaining on or entering the market and to make that information public.

Other elements of the legislation would require:

*Chemicals to meet a health standard to enter or remain on the market.

*EPA to identify and restrict the most toxic chemicals that build up in our food chain and in our bodies, such as brominated flame retardants.

*Populations most vulnerable to toxic chemicals, including pregnant women, infants and children, and those living in environmental ‘hot spots’, to have extra protections from toxic chemicals.

*EPA to rely on the National Academy of Sciences’ recommendations to incorporate the best and latest science when determining the safety of chemicals.

Today’s bill, introduced in the House, follows a similar bill introduced in the Senate in April by Senator Lautenburg (D-NJ) called the “Safe Chemicals Act of 2010”.  For the past three months Congressmen Rush and Waxman have been meeting with key stakeholders including industry representatives, health and environmental advocates and the EPA to come up with a balanced bill.

“Right now our nation is bearing the brunt of decades of lax to non- existent federal oversight and the harm to consumers is immeasurable,” said Congressman Rush in a recent article about the bill.

Just this year the President’s Cancer Panel reported that “the true burden of environmentally induced cancers has been grossly underestimated.”

“People have been led to believe that chemicals are proven safe before added to products we use every day, but the law doesn’t offer that protection,” said Igrejas.  “Today’s legislation gives EPA both the authority and a mandate to begin making up for 34 years of neglect.  Congress should seize this opportunity immediately.”

#   #   #

Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families is a broad coalition of groups, including major environmental organizations like the Natural Resources Defense Council and the Environmental Defense Fund, health organizations like the Learning Disabilities Association, Breast Cancer Fund, and the Autism Society, health professionals and providers like the American Nurses Association, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, and the Mt. Sinai Children’s Environmental Health Center, and concerned parents groups like the 1 million-member MomsRising. For more information visit our website at www.saferchemicals.org.

Filed in ~Media Feeds | No responses yet

Cancer and green chemistry

Terry on Jul 10th 2010

Op Ed, Boston Globe
By Teresa Heinz Kerry, Terry Collins and John Warner | July 10, 2010

THE PRESIDENT’S Cancer Panel recently issued a stunning report on the role of environmental factors in causing cancer. For those wondering why America has yet to win the war against cancer, the panel minces no words: “The true burden of environmentally induced cancers has been grossly underestimated.’’ If you ignore the cause, how can you prevent cancer and really win the war?

The panel urges strong actions to reduce people’s widespread exposures to carcinogens. It says the prevailing regulatory approach used in the United States is “reactionary, not preventive.’’ It concludes that US regulation of cancer-causing chemicals is ineffective for several reasons, including inadequate funding, weak laws, and undue industry influence.

This report is not the result of a liberal panel following the lead of the Obama administration. Both panel members were appointed by President George W. Bush and the panel’s public hearings were conducted before Bush left office.The report identifies a series of actions that can be taken to win the war against cancer.

First, it recommends that a prevention-oriented approach should replace the current reactionary system, and that this should become the cornerstone of a new national cancer prevention strategy.

It finds that government agencies responsible for protecting Americans from cancer need more tools, and that a more integrated and transparent system — one driven by science and free from political or industry influence — must be developed to protect public health.

Among its many recommendations, we were especially encouraged to find this: “ ‘Green chemistry’ initiatives and research . . . should be pursued and supported more aggressively. . .’’ Green chemistry offers a path forward that leads both to a healthier America and a wave of positive chemical innovations that can strengthen our economy.

World markets want safe materials. Green chemistry will be able to provide them, but only if it gets the resources it needs to flourish. Other countries, including Germany, India, and, China, are investing far more in green chemistry than the United States does. As demand grows for safer materials because of the compelling science that show how chemicals in wide use today are undermining our health, America’s chemical industry needs to become the leader.

What’s holding us back? Lack of financial support for green chemistry research and innovation. But just turning on the funding spigot won’t be enough. We also need to reinvent how chemistry is taught in US colleges and universities.

Green chemistry equips chemists with the knowledge to ask tough questions about potential hazards when they are thinking about making a new chemical. As they make choices early in new chemical design, this simple step could dramatically reduce the chances that new chemicals would be toxic.

In the past, chemists have rarely been trained to ask these questions. It’s as if a course in driver’s education never taught students about traffic accidents. Perhaps not surprisingly, students as well as potential employers are creating demand for this change.

Green chemistry has a long way to go to develop a full toolkit of chemical methods that can replace more classic approaches. But the path is clear, a “prevention-oriented’’ design strategy that can do honor to the President’s Cancer Panel’s insistence that “new products must be well-studied prior to and following their introduction into the environment. . .’’

Invigorating green chemistry is a win-win solution. Americans will become healthier because the materials in their homes, the air, and water will be safe by design, and the chemical industry will be better positioned to compete in world markets that care about chemical safety.

Teresa Heinz Kerry is chairman of the Heinz Family Philanthropies. Terry Collins is a professor of green chemistry at Carnegie Mellon University. John Warner is president of the Warner-Babcock Institute for Green Chemistry.

read online

Filed in ~Media Feeds | No responses yet

A Call to Action

Terry on Jul 6th 2010

Pensacola News Journal

Editorial series, part 5: A Call to Action

Measuring pollution’s impact
So how do scientists try to measure the impact of pollution?

They look at broad areas — such as ZIP codes — and try to draw conclusions about what they find. They use “models” that tell them what they might find given the presence of certain levels of various pollutants.

Related

* Four cancer hot spots in our area
* Editorial series, part 5: Sins of the past will haunt our future

In 2008, the first results of a University of West Florida study begun in 2002 and funded by the Environmental Protection Agency and the Centers for Disease Control reported that health problems scientists would expect to find from the kinds of air pollution found in this area match the kinds of health problems found here.

For example:
• Infant deaths from birth defects occur at a much higher rate — 1 in 432 cases — in Escambia County than in the rest of Florida, where the rate is 1 in 728.

• Escambia County has more hospitalizations from asthma than the state average, and that number is rising. In most of Florida it is falling.

• People in three areas of Santa Rosa County and one in Escambia were at risk of elevated cancer rates because of industrial emissions.

But, the study found, the people at the highest risk of health problems from pollution across the two-county area are those in areas along busy roadways, where a chemical laundry list of ground-level pollutants from car and truck exhaust are heaviest.

The worst area? Blue Angel Parkway near its intersection with U.S. 98 in Escambia County.

The findings match projections from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection that vehicle exhaust is surpassing industry as the greatest air pollution threat in the area.

But the findings present a challenge that comes from comparing our health problems with those of other communities. If pollution causes disease, and pollution is widespread, how do you tell what is normal?

For example, if the national level of cancer is elevated by pollution, what does it tell you if the level in the Pensacola Bay Area is close to it? If we don’t know what cancer rates would be like in a pristine world, it’s hard to say if pollution raises risks here.

read online

Filed in Florida | No responses yet

Cancer cluster or not, the reality is plain awful

Terry on Jul 4th 2010

Columnist Logan Jenkins

By Logan Jenkins, San Diego Union-Tribute

Sunday, July 4, 2010 at 9 p.m.

Three years ago, my sister died in a cancer cluster.

Or so she and her fellow teachers believed like an article of faith.

As it almost invariably does, the California Cancer Registry debunked the plague that gave my sister’s terminal illness meaning beyond herself.

If she died from something evil in the ground, air or water, my sister would be transformed into an innocent canary in a coal mine, not a loser in a lottery of random chance. Her long illness, if dramatic environmental causes could be found, could save others from the same fate.

As in the vast majority of reported clusters — and there are hundreds, if not thousands, every year — state epidemiologists concluded that statistical chance caused the appearance of a cancer cluster at La Quinta Middle School.

At last count, some 18 La Quinta Middle School employees contracted cancer over a 15-year period. More than a dozen former students have been diagnosed.

In the past few years, my sister’s colleagues have retired or transferred. To those burdened by memory, it remains a sick school, a Love Canal with classrooms that the state would never acknowledge.

The prohibitive odds are that the cancer cluster around Carlsbad’s Kelly Elementary School will, in time, also fade from the news pages.

The harsh truth is that cancer occurs often and for any number of complex reasons. Finding a specific cause, a carcinogenic smoking gun, is terribly rare.

“Don’t let anyone suffer the way I have.”

Those were among the last words of a 16-year-old Carlsbad boy to his stricken parents.

In the last six months, Stacey and John Quartarone have dedicated themselves to find out if Chase, who passed away last December of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, died because he was exposed to something toxic in his neighborhood.

“My mantra, my life, my goal is to be true to his request,” John told me.

A grieving father can’t discover a cure for cancer, but the retired librarian has collected information like a Nobel Prize winner. He’s turned the mining of ominous data into a part-time job, growing Chase’s death into a well-publicized cluster, pressuring public health officials to hold packed meetings, pressing politicians to take notice of the ominously high numbers of cancer victims.

John Quartarone doesn’t know exactly where the evil lurks — in the nearby Encina power plant? the Agua Hedionda Lagoon? the pesticide-rich farmland upon which houses have been built? — but he won’t rest until every test has been conducted, every environmental factor ruled out.

“When the scientists report that everything is standard, I’ll be content,” he told me.

Until then, he’ll push for expensive tests. Local politicians like Supervisor Bill Horn and Rep. Brian Bilbray, R-Solana Beach, both facing re-election, have heard the call.

In his story on the most recent public meeting in Carlsbad, Union-Tribune reporter Keith Darcé quoted a UCSD psychology professor suggesting that the belief in cancer clusters is often a result of the human refusal to believe that a loved one died from chance, from an inexplicable act of God, if you will.

“It’s hugely comforting to think that the world doesn’t just strike people down, especially innocent children,” Nicholas Christenfeld said.

There is, however, another way to view clusters that does not patronize believers as either mathematically dense or psychologically bewildered.

In a sense, I’m living in a cancer cluster. You are, too.

It is undeniable that the whole country is one gargantuan cancer cluster. Think about it. Almost half of us will contract the disease before we die. If that’s not a cluster, what is?

Examined from 30,000 feet, the Earth’s atmosphere is polluted. The ocean is full of metals. Processed food? You know it’s a horror story. Not to mention cigarettes, alcohol. And now we learn that cell phones could be microwaving our brains.

I could go on, but you know all this as well as I do.

In the infinite goodness of his heart, Chase asked too much of his parents. There are no perfectly safe zones. There’s no catcher in the pesticide-laced rye.

Even in a dark coal mine, however, it’s the nature of canaries to sing and fly toward the sky.

There’s a healthy garden underneath the global oil spill if only we can muster the will to scrub it clean and keep it well-lighted.

Before he died, Chase was on the verge of making Eagle Scout. His final project, which he did not live to complete, was a quiet sanctuary at his beloved Kelly Elementary School, ground zero in the suspected Carlsbad cancer cluster.

Chase’s idea was to create a place where a black Lab, an unflappable and very patient therapy dog called Rosie, would be on duty to listen to students read out loud.

The project is just about finished, thanks to Chase’s family, volunteers and local businesses that donated materials.

Rosie’s Garden will not save children from cancer, but it’s good for the heart.

Logan Jenkins: (760) 752-6756; logan.jenkins@uniontrib.com
read online

Filed in California | No responses yet